Message ID | 20200922001000.899956-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular | expand |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:09:51PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> > > Rename the internal function as it is internal, and as > the name will be used in rpmsg_core. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> > --- > drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > index 7d7ed4e5cce7..e8d55c8b9cbf 100644 > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > @@ -395,8 +395,9 @@ static void virtio_rpmsg_release_device(struct device *dev) > * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic > * channels. > */ > -static struct rpmsg_device *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp, > - struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) > +static struct rpmsg_device * > +__rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp, > + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) Nitpick: we now have 100 characters, so there's no *need* any more to split that line, now it's more a matter of consistent style and personal preference. Most functions in that file have function type and name on the same line, but a few also make the split like here... So, we can choose our poison here I guess. Thanks Guennadi > { > struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch; > struct rpmsg_device *rpdev; > @@ -869,7 +870,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len, > if (ret) > dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret); > } else { > - newch = rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo); > + newch = __rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo); > if (!newch) > dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_create_channel failed\n"); > } > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:09:51PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> > > > > Rename the internal function as it is internal, and as > > the name will be used in rpmsg_core. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> > > --- > > drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 7 ++++--- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > index 7d7ed4e5cce7..e8d55c8b9cbf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > @@ -395,8 +395,9 @@ static void virtio_rpmsg_release_device(struct device *dev) > > * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic > > * channels. > > */ > > -static struct rpmsg_device *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp, > > - struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) > > +static struct rpmsg_device * > > +__rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp, > > + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) > > Nitpick: we now have 100 characters, so there's no *need* any more to split that > line, now it's more a matter of consistent style and personal preference. Most > functions in that file have function type and name on the same line, but a few > also make the split like here... > So, we can choose our poison here I guess. > I agree - there is really no _better_ way of doing this. I'll let Bjorn make the final call but I'm pretty sure he doesn't have a strong opinion either. > Thanks > Guennadi > > > { > > struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch; > > struct rpmsg_device *rpdev; > > @@ -869,7 +870,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len, > > if (ret) > > dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret); > > } else { > > - newch = rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo); > > + newch = __rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo); > > if (!newch) > > dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_create_channel failed\n"); > > } > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c index 7d7ed4e5cce7..e8d55c8b9cbf 100644 --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c @@ -395,8 +395,9 @@ static void virtio_rpmsg_release_device(struct device *dev) * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic * channels. */ -static struct rpmsg_device *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp, - struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) +static struct rpmsg_device * +__rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp, + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) { struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch; struct rpmsg_device *rpdev; @@ -869,7 +870,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len, if (ret) dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret); } else { - newch = rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo); + newch = __rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo); if (!newch) dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_create_channel failed\n"); }