| Message ID | 20220817145901.865977-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM/hwlock: qcom: switch TCSR mutex to MMIO | expand |
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.yaml index 1c7149f7d171..de98b961fb38 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.yaml @@ -15,9 +15,18 @@ description: properties: compatible: - enum: - - qcom,sfpb-mutex - - qcom,tcsr-mutex + oneOf: + - enum: + - qcom,sfpb-mutex + - qcom,tcsr-mutex + - items: + - enum: + - qcom,apq8084-tcsr-mutex + - qcom,ipq6018-tcsr-mutex + - qcom,msm8226-tcsr-mutex + - qcom,msm8974-tcsr-mutex + - qcom,msm8994-tcsr-mutex + - const: qcom,tcsr-mutex reg: maxItems: 1
Older Qualcomm SoCs have TCSR mutex registers with 0x80 stride, instead of 0x1000. Add dedicated compatibles for such case. Unfortunately the binding started using a generic "qcom,tcsr-mutex" compatible without specifying the SoC part, thus it looks now quite inconsistent. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- If anyone ever says "I want a generic compatible because I am sure all devices are compatible", that's one more argument they are wrong. :) --- .../bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.yaml | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)