diff mbox series

[2/5] media: adv748x: csi2: Link AFE with TXA and TXB

Message ID 1544541373-30044-3-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Kieran Bingham
Headers show
Series media: adv748x: Implement dynamic routing support | expand

Commit Message

Jacopo Mondi Dec. 11, 2018, 3:16 p.m. UTC
The ADV748x chip supports routing AFE output to either TXA or TXB.
In order to support run-time configuration of video stream path, create an
additional (not enabled) "AFE:8->TXA:0" link, and remove the IMMUTABLE flag
from existing ones.

Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

Comments

Kieran Bingham Dec. 11, 2018, 11:07 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jacopo,

Thank you for the patch,

On 11/12/2018 15:16, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> The ADV748x chip supports routing AFE output to either TXA or TXB.
> In order to support run-time configuration of video stream path, create an
> additional (not enabled) "AFE:8->TXA:0" link, and remove the IMMUTABLE flag
> from existing ones.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> index 6ce21542ed48..4d1aefc2c8d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>   * @v4l2_dev: Video registration device
>   * @src: Source subdevice to establish link
>   * @src_pad: Pad number of source to link to this @tx
> + * @flags: Flags for the newly created link
>   *
>   * Ensure that the subdevice is registered against the v4l2_device, and link the
>   * source pad to the sink pad of the CSI2 bus entity.
> @@ -34,17 +35,11 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>  static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>  				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>  				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
> -				      unsigned int src_pad)
> +				      unsigned int src_pad,
> +				      unsigned int flags)
>  {
> -	int enabled = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	/*
> -	 * Dynamic linking of the AFE is not supported.
> -	 * Register the links as immutable.
> -	 */
> -	enabled |= MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE;
> -

Yup - that part certainly needs to go ...

>  	if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
>  		ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -53,7 +48,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
> 
>  	return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
>  				     &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
> -				     enabled);
> +				     flags);
>  }
> 
>  /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -68,24 +63,41 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>  {
>  	struct adv748x_csi2 *tx = adv748x_sd_to_csi2(sd);
>  	struct adv748x_state *state = tx->state;
> +	int ret;
> 
>  	adv_dbg(state, "Registered %s (%s)", is_txa(tx) ? "TXA":"TXB",
>  			sd->name);
> 
>  	/*
> -	 * The adv748x hardware allows the AFE to route through the TXA, however
> -	 * this is not currently supported in this driver.
> +	 * Link TXA to HDMI and AFE, and TXB to AFE only as TXB cannot output
> +	 * HDMI.
>  	 *
> -	 * Link HDMI->TXA, and AFE->TXB directly.
> +	 * The HDMI->TXA link is enabled by default, as the AFE->TXB is.
>  	 */
> -	if (is_txa(tx) && is_hdmi_enabled(state))
> -		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> -						  &state->hdmi.sd,
> -						  ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE);
> -	if (!is_txa(tx) && is_afe_enabled(state))
> +	if (is_txa(tx)) {
> +		if (is_hdmi_enabled(state)) {
> +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> +							 &state->hdmi.sd,
> +							 ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE,
> +							 MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (is_afe_enabled(state)) {
> +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> +							 &state->afe.sd,
> +							 ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
> +							 0);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +		}


> +	} else if (is_afe_enabled(state))

I believe when adding braces to one side of an if statement, we are
supposed to add to the else clauses too ?

>  		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
>  						  &state->afe.sd,
> -						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE);
> +						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
> +						  MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);

Won't this enable the AFE link for both TXA and TXB ?
Which one will win? Just the last one ? the first one ?
Does it error?

(It might not be a problem ... I can't recall what the behaviour is)


> +

There are a lot of nested if's above, and I think we can simplify
greatly if we move the logic for the flags inside
adv748x_csi2_register_link(), and adjust the checks on is_xxx_enabled()

What do you think about the following pseudo code?:


int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
  				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
  				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
				      unsigned int src_pad,
				      bool enable)
{

  int flags = 0;
  int ret;

  if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
	ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src)
	if (ret) return ret;
  }

  if (enable)
	flags = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;

   return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
 			        &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
 			        flags);
}

int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
{
  int ret;

  if (is_afe_enabled(state) {
      ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->afe.sd,
				   ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE, !is_txa(tx));
      if (ret)
	  return ret;
  }

  /* TX-B only supports AFE */
  if (!is_txa(tx) || !(is_hdmi_enabled(state))
	return 0;

  return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->hdmi.sd,
				    ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE, true);
}


The above will for TXA:
	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = false );
	register_link(..., HDMI_SOURCE, enable = true );

then TXB:
	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = true );

Does that meet our needs?




>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Jacopo Mondi Dec. 12, 2018, 8:21 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Kieran,

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:07:09PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thank you for the patch,
>
> On 11/12/2018 15:16, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > The ADV748x chip supports routing AFE output to either TXA or TXB.
> > In order to support run-time configuration of video stream path, create an
> > additional (not enabled) "AFE:8->TXA:0" link, and remove the IMMUTABLE flag
> > from existing ones.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> > index 6ce21542ed48..4d1aefc2c8d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
> >   * @v4l2_dev: Video registration device
> >   * @src: Source subdevice to establish link
> >   * @src_pad: Pad number of source to link to this @tx
> > + * @flags: Flags for the newly created link
> >   *
> >   * Ensure that the subdevice is registered against the v4l2_device, and link the
> >   * source pad to the sink pad of the CSI2 bus entity.
> > @@ -34,17 +35,11 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
> >  static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
> >  				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
> >  				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
> > -				      unsigned int src_pad)
> > +				      unsigned int src_pad,
> > +				      unsigned int flags)
> >  {
> > -	int enabled = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Dynamic linking of the AFE is not supported.
> > -	 * Register the links as immutable.
> > -	 */
> > -	enabled |= MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE;
> > -
>
> Yup - that part certainly needs to go ...
>
> >  	if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
> >  		ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src);
> >  		if (ret)
> > @@ -53,7 +48,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
> >
> >  	return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
> >  				     &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
> > -				     enabled);
> > +				     flags);
> >  }
> >
> >  /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > @@ -68,24 +63,41 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >  {
> >  	struct adv748x_csi2 *tx = adv748x_sd_to_csi2(sd);
> >  	struct adv748x_state *state = tx->state;
> > +	int ret;
> >
> >  	adv_dbg(state, "Registered %s (%s)", is_txa(tx) ? "TXA":"TXB",
> >  			sd->name);
> >
> >  	/*
> > -	 * The adv748x hardware allows the AFE to route through the TXA, however
> > -	 * this is not currently supported in this driver.
> > +	 * Link TXA to HDMI and AFE, and TXB to AFE only as TXB cannot output
> > +	 * HDMI.
> >  	 *
> > -	 * Link HDMI->TXA, and AFE->TXB directly.
> > +	 * The HDMI->TXA link is enabled by default, as the AFE->TXB is.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (is_txa(tx) && is_hdmi_enabled(state))
> > -		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> > -						  &state->hdmi.sd,
> > -						  ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE);
> > -	if (!is_txa(tx) && is_afe_enabled(state))
> > +	if (is_txa(tx)) {
> > +		if (is_hdmi_enabled(state)) {
> > +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> > +							 &state->hdmi.sd,
> > +							 ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE,
> > +							 MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (is_afe_enabled(state)) {
> > +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> > +							 &state->afe.sd,
> > +							 ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
> > +							 0);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
>
>
> > +	} else if (is_afe_enabled(state))
>
> I believe when adding braces to one side of an if statement, we are
> supposed to add to the else clauses too ?

Correct

>
> >  		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> >  						  &state->afe.sd,
> > -						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE);
> > +						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
> > +						  MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
>
> Won't this enable the AFE link for both TXA and TXB ?
> Which one will win? Just the last one ? the first one ?
> Does it error?
>
> (It might not be a problem ... I can't recall what the behaviour is)
>
>

The AFE->TXA link is created as not enabled (see the 0 as last
argument in the adv748x_csi2_register_link() call above here, in the
'is_txa(tx)' case

> > +
>
> There are a lot of nested if's above, and I think we can simplify
> greatly if we move the logic for the flags inside
> adv748x_csi2_register_link(), and adjust the checks on is_xxx_enabled()
>
> What do you think about the following pseudo code?:
>
>
> int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>   				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>   				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
> 				      unsigned int src_pad,
> 				      bool enable)
> {
>
>   int flags = 0;
>   int ret;
>
>   if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
> 	ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src)
> 	if (ret) return ret;
>   }
>
>   if (enable)
> 	flags = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
>
>    return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
>  			        &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
>  			        flags);
> }
>
> int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> {
>   int ret;
>
>   if (is_afe_enabled(state) {
>       ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->afe.sd,
> 				   ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE, !is_txa(tx));
>       if (ret)
> 	  return ret;
>   }
>
>   /* TX-B only supports AFE */
>   if (!is_txa(tx) || !(is_hdmi_enabled(state))
> 	return 0;
>
>   return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->hdmi.sd,
> 				    ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE, true);
> }
>
>
> The above will for TXA:
> 	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = false );
> 	register_link(..., HDMI_SOURCE, enable = true );
>
> then TXB:
> 	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = true );
>
> Does that meet our needs?
>

Yes it does, and it looks better. Thanks!

>
>
>
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
> --
> Regards
> --
> Kieran
Kieran Bingham Dec. 12, 2018, 10:19 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Jacopo,

On 12/12/2018 08:21, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:07:09PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> Hi Jacopo,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch,
>>
>> On 11/12/2018 15:16, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>>> The ADV748x chip supports routing AFE output to either TXA or TXB.
>>> In order to support run-time configuration of video stream path, create an
>>> additional (not enabled) "AFE:8->TXA:0" link, and remove the IMMUTABLE flag
>>> from existing ones.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
>>> index 6ce21542ed48..4d1aefc2c8d0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>>>   * @v4l2_dev: Video registration device
>>>   * @src: Source subdevice to establish link
>>>   * @src_pad: Pad number of source to link to this @tx
>>> + * @flags: Flags for the newly created link
>>>   *
>>>   * Ensure that the subdevice is registered against the v4l2_device, and link the
>>>   * source pad to the sink pad of the CSI2 bus entity.
>>> @@ -34,17 +35,11 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>>>  static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>>>  				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>>>  				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
>>> -				      unsigned int src_pad)
>>> +				      unsigned int src_pad,
>>> +				      unsigned int flags)
>>>  {
>>> -	int enabled = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
>>>  	int ret;
>>>
>>> -	/*
>>> -	 * Dynamic linking of the AFE is not supported.
>>> -	 * Register the links as immutable.
>>> -	 */
>>> -	enabled |= MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE;
>>> -
>>
>> Yup - that part certainly needs to go ...
>>
>>>  	if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
>>>  		ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src);
>>>  		if (ret)
>>> @@ -53,7 +48,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>>>
>>>  	return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
>>>  				     &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
>>> -				     enabled);
>>> +				     flags);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> @@ -68,24 +63,41 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct adv748x_csi2 *tx = adv748x_sd_to_csi2(sd);
>>>  	struct adv748x_state *state = tx->state;
>>> +	int ret;
>>>
>>>  	adv_dbg(state, "Registered %s (%s)", is_txa(tx) ? "TXA":"TXB",
>>>  			sd->name);
>>>
>>>  	/*
>>> -	 * The adv748x hardware allows the AFE to route through the TXA, however
>>> -	 * this is not currently supported in this driver.
>>> +	 * Link TXA to HDMI and AFE, and TXB to AFE only as TXB cannot output
>>> +	 * HDMI.
>>>  	 *
>>> -	 * Link HDMI->TXA, and AFE->TXB directly.
>>> +	 * The HDMI->TXA link is enabled by default, as the AFE->TXB is.
>>>  	 */
>>> -	if (is_txa(tx) && is_hdmi_enabled(state))
>>> -		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
>>> -						  &state->hdmi.sd,
>>> -						  ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE);
>>> -	if (!is_txa(tx) && is_afe_enabled(state))
>>> +	if (is_txa(tx)) {
>>> +		if (is_hdmi_enabled(state)) {
>>> +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
>>> +							 &state->hdmi.sd,
>>> +							 ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE,
>>> +							 MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
>>> +			if (ret)
>>> +				return ret;
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		if (is_afe_enabled(state)) {
>>> +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
>>> +							 &state->afe.sd,
>>> +							 ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
>>> +							 0);
>>> +			if (ret)
>>> +				return ret;
>>> +		}
>>
>>
>>> +	} else if (is_afe_enabled(state))
>>
>> I believe when adding braces to one side of an if statement, we are
>> supposed to add to the else clauses too ?
> 
> Correct
> 
>>
>>>  		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
>>>  						  &state->afe.sd,
>>> -						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE);
>>> +						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
>>> +						  MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
>>
>> Won't this enable the AFE link for both TXA and TXB ?
>> Which one will win? Just the last one ? the first one ?
>> Does it error?
>>
>> (It might not be a problem ... I can't recall what the behaviour is)
>>
>>
> 
> The AFE->TXA link is created as not enabled (see the 0 as last
> argument in the adv748x_csi2_register_link() call above here, in the
> 'is_txa(tx)' case

Ugh - of course it is ... I was clearly way too tired last night. Oops :D


> 
>>> +
>>
>> There are a lot of nested if's above, and I think we can simplify
>> greatly if we move the logic for the flags inside
>> adv748x_csi2_register_link(), and adjust the checks on is_xxx_enabled()
>>
>> What do you think about the following pseudo code?:
>>
>>
>> int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
>>   				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>>   				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
>> 				      unsigned int src_pad,
>> 				      bool enable)
>> {
>>
>>   int flags = 0;
>>   int ret;
>>
>>   if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
>> 	ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src)
>> 	if (ret) return ret;
>>   }
>>
>>   if (enable)
>> 	flags = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
>>
>>    return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
>>  			        &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
>>  			        flags);
>> }
>>
>> int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>> {
>>   int ret;
>>
>>   if (is_afe_enabled(state) {
>>       ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->afe.sd,
>> 				   ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE, !is_txa(tx));
>>       if (ret)
>> 	  return ret;
>>   }
>>
>>   /* TX-B only supports AFE */
>>   if (!is_txa(tx) || !(is_hdmi_enabled(state))
>> 	return 0;
>>
>>   return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->hdmi.sd,
>> 				    ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE, true);
>> }
>>
>>
>> The above will for TXA:
>> 	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = false );
>> 	register_link(..., HDMI_SOURCE, enable = true );
>>
>> then TXB:
>> 	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = true );
>>
>> Does that meet our needs?
>>
> 
> Yes it does, and it looks better. Thanks!

Great - something useful came out of my non-sleeping sleepiness :)




>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> --
>> Kieran
Laurent Pinchart Dec. 13, 2018, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Jacopo,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday, 12 December 2018 10:21:01 EET jacopo mondi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:07:09PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > On 11/12/2018 15:16, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >> The ADV748x chip supports routing AFE output to either TXA or TXB.
> >> In order to support run-time configuration of video stream path, create
> >> an additional (not enabled) "AFE:8->TXA:0" link, and remove the
> >> IMMUTABLE flag from existing ones.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++---------
> >>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> >> b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c index
> >> 6ce21542ed48..4d1aefc2c8d0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
> >> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct
> >> adv748x_csi2 *tx,> > 
> >>   * @v4l2_dev: Video registration device
> >>   * @src: Source subdevice to establish link
> >>   * @src_pad: Pad number of source to link to this @tx
> >> + * @flags: Flags for the newly created link

You may want to name this link_flags, up to you.

> >>   *
> >>   * Ensure that the subdevice is registered against the v4l2_device, and
> >>   link the
> >>   * source pad to the sink pad of the CSI2 bus entity.

[snip]

> >> @@ -68,24 +63,41 @@ static int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct
> >> v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct adv748x_csi2 *tx = adv748x_sd_to_csi2(sd);
> >>  	struct adv748x_state *state = tx->state;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> 
> >>  	adv_dbg(state, "Registered %s (%s)", is_txa(tx) ? "TXA":"TXB",
> >>  			sd->name);
> >>  	
> >>  	/*
> >> -	 * The adv748x hardware allows the AFE to route through the TXA,
> >> however
> >> -	 * this is not currently supported in this driver.
> >> +	 * Link TXA to HDMI and AFE, and TXB to AFE only as TXB cannot output
> >> +	 * HDMI.
> >>  	 *
> >> -	 * Link HDMI->TXA, and AFE->TXB directly.
> >> +	 * The HDMI->TXA link is enabled by default, as the AFE->TXB is.
> >>  	 */
> >> -	if (is_txa(tx) && is_hdmi_enabled(state))
> >> -		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> >> -						  &state->hdmi.sd,
> >> -						  ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE);
> >> -	if (!is_txa(tx) && is_afe_enabled(state))
> >> +	if (is_txa(tx)) {
> >> +		if (is_hdmi_enabled(state)) {
> >> +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> >> +							 &state->hdmi.sd,
> >> +							 ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE,
> >> +							 MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
> >> +			if (ret)
> >> +				return ret;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		if (is_afe_enabled(state)) {
> >> +			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> >> +							 &state->afe.sd,
> >> +							 ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
> >> +							 0);
> >> +			if (ret)
> >> +				return ret;
> >> +		}

I wonder whether in the case where both HDMI and TXB are disabled we shouldn't 
create this link as immutable and enabled ? This would require a big 
refactoring, possibly including deep changes in the v4l2-async and MC code, so 
it's likely out of scope for this patch (unless you see an easy way to do so).

> >> +	} else if (is_afe_enabled(state))
> > 
> > I believe when adding braces to one side of an if statement, we are
> > supposed to add to the else clauses too ?
> 
> Correct

And I would write this

	} else {
		if (is_afe_enabled(state))
			...
	}

To more clearly visualize the TXA and TXB code.

> >>  		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
> >>  						  &state->afe.sd,
> >> -						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE);
> >> +						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
> >> +						  MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
> > 
> > Won't this enable the AFE link for both TXA and TXB ?
> > Which one will win? Just the last one ? the first one ?
> > Does it error?
> > 
> > (It might not be a problem ... I can't recall what the behaviour is)
> 
> The AFE->TXA link is created as not enabled (see the 0 as last
> argument in the adv748x_csi2_register_link() call above here, in the
> 'is_txa(tx)' case
> 
> >> +
> > 
> > There are a lot of nested if's above, and I think we can simplify
> > greatly if we move the logic for the flags inside
> > adv748x_csi2_register_link(), and adjust the checks on is_xxx_enabled()
> > 
> > What do you think about the following pseudo code?:
> > 
> > int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
> >   				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
> >   				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
> > 				      unsigned int src_pad,
> > 				      bool enable)
> > {
> >   int flags = 0;
> >   int ret;
> >   
> >   if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
> > 	ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src)
> > 	if (ret) return ret;
> >   }
> >   
> >   if (enable)
> > 	flags = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
> > 	
> >    return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
> >  			        &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
> >  			        flags);
> > }
> > 
> > int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > {
> >   int ret;
> >   

I would add

	/* The AFE can be routed to both TXA and TXB. */

> >   if (is_afe_enabled(state) {
> >       ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->afe.sd,
> > 				   ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE, !is_txa(tx));
> >       if (ret)
> > 	  return ret;
> >   }
> >   
> >   /* TX-B only supports AFE */
> >   if (!is_txa(tx) || !(is_hdmi_enabled(state))
> > 	return 0;
> > 	
> >   return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev, &state->hdmi.sd,
> > 				    ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE, true);
> > }

Looks better than my above proposal :-)

> > The above will for TXA:
> > 	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = false );
> > 	register_link(..., HDMI_SOURCE, enable = true );
> > 
> > then TXB:
> > 	register_link(..., AFE_SOURCE, enable = true );
> > 
> > Does that meet our needs?
> 
> Yes it does, and it looks better. Thanks!
> 
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }

With Kieran's proposed change,

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
index 6ce21542ed48..4d1aefc2c8d0 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-csi2.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@  static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
  * @v4l2_dev: Video registration device
  * @src: Source subdevice to establish link
  * @src_pad: Pad number of source to link to this @tx
+ * @flags: Flags for the newly created link
  *
  * Ensure that the subdevice is registered against the v4l2_device, and link the
  * source pad to the sink pad of the CSI2 bus entity.
@@ -34,17 +35,11 @@  static int adv748x_csi2_set_virtual_channel(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
 static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,
 				      struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
 				      struct v4l2_subdev *src,
-				      unsigned int src_pad)
+				      unsigned int src_pad,
+				      unsigned int flags)
 {
-	int enabled = MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED;
 	int ret;

-	/*
-	 * Dynamic linking of the AFE is not supported.
-	 * Register the links as immutable.
-	 */
-	enabled |= MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE;
-
 	if (!src->v4l2_dev) {
 		ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(v4l2_dev, src);
 		if (ret)
@@ -53,7 +48,7 @@  static int adv748x_csi2_register_link(struct adv748x_csi2 *tx,

 	return media_create_pad_link(&src->entity, src_pad,
 				     &tx->sd.entity, ADV748X_CSI2_SINK,
-				     enabled);
+				     flags);
 }

 /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -68,24 +63,41 @@  static int adv748x_csi2_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
 {
 	struct adv748x_csi2 *tx = adv748x_sd_to_csi2(sd);
 	struct adv748x_state *state = tx->state;
+	int ret;

 	adv_dbg(state, "Registered %s (%s)", is_txa(tx) ? "TXA":"TXB",
 			sd->name);

 	/*
-	 * The adv748x hardware allows the AFE to route through the TXA, however
-	 * this is not currently supported in this driver.
+	 * Link TXA to HDMI and AFE, and TXB to AFE only as TXB cannot output
+	 * HDMI.
 	 *
-	 * Link HDMI->TXA, and AFE->TXB directly.
+	 * The HDMI->TXA link is enabled by default, as the AFE->TXB is.
 	 */
-	if (is_txa(tx) && is_hdmi_enabled(state))
-		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
-						  &state->hdmi.sd,
-						  ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE);
-	if (!is_txa(tx) && is_afe_enabled(state))
+	if (is_txa(tx)) {
+		if (is_hdmi_enabled(state)) {
+			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
+							 &state->hdmi.sd,
+							 ADV748X_HDMI_SOURCE,
+							 MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		}
+
+		if (is_afe_enabled(state)) {
+			ret = adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
+							 &state->afe.sd,
+							 ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
+							 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		}
+	} else if (is_afe_enabled(state))
 		return adv748x_csi2_register_link(tx, sd->v4l2_dev,
 						  &state->afe.sd,
-						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE);
+						  ADV748X_AFE_SOURCE,
+						  MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED);
+
 	return 0;
 }