| Message ID | 20160916093942.17213-3-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
Hi Ulrich, Thank you for the patch. On Friday 16 Sep 2016 11:39:42 Ulrich Hecht wrote: > Fall back to input 0 if "default-input" property is not present. > > Documentation states that the "default-input" property should reside > directly in the node for adv7612. Not just fo adv7612. > Hence, also adjust the parsing to make the implementation consistent with > this. > > Based on patch by William Towle <william.towle@codethink.co.uk>. > > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> > --- > drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c > index 4003831..055c9df 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c > @@ -3077,10 +3077,13 @@ static int adv76xx_parse_dt(struct adv76xx_state > *state) > if (!of_property_read_u32(endpoint, "default-input", &v)) Should this be removed if the property has to be in the device node and not in the endpoint ? > state->pdata.default_input = v; > else > - state->pdata.default_input = -1; > + state->pdata.default_input = 0; What was the use case for setting it to -1 ? Is it safe to change that ? > of_node_put(endpoint); > > + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "default-input", &v)) > + state->pdata.default_input = v; > + > flags = bus_cfg.bus.parallel.flags; > > if (flags & V4L2_MBUS_HSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH)
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > > Thank you for the patch. Thanks for your review. > > On Friday 16 Sep 2016 11:39:42 Ulrich Hecht wrote: >> Fall back to input 0 if "default-input" property is not present. >> >> Documentation states that the "default-input" property should reside >> directly in the node for adv7612. > > Not just fo adv7612. > >> Hence, also adjust the parsing to make the implementation consistent with >> this. >> >> Based on patch by William Towle <william.towle@codethink.co.uk>. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> >> --- >> drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c >> index 4003831..055c9df 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c >> @@ -3077,10 +3077,13 @@ static int adv76xx_parse_dt(struct adv76xx_state >> *state) >> if (!of_property_read_u32(endpoint, "default-input", &v)) > > Should this be removed if the property has to be in the device node and not in > the endpoint ? Probably, considering it's not used anywhere yet. > >> state->pdata.default_input = v; >> else >> - state->pdata.default_input = -1; >> + state->pdata.default_input = 0; > > What was the use case for setting it to -1 ? Is it safe to change that ? Not sure. Might as well leave it at -1, we define the default in the DT anyway. CU Uli
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c index 4003831..055c9df 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c @@ -3077,10 +3077,13 @@ static int adv76xx_parse_dt(struct adv76xx_state *state) if (!of_property_read_u32(endpoint, "default-input", &v)) state->pdata.default_input = v; else - state->pdata.default_input = -1; + state->pdata.default_input = 0; of_node_put(endpoint); + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "default-input", &v)) + state->pdata.default_input = v; + flags = bus_cfg.bus.parallel.flags; if (flags & V4L2_MBUS_HSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH)