From patchwork Wed Aug 30 14:41:18 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dietmar Eggemann X-Patchwork-Id: 9929823 X-Patchwork-Delegate: horms@verge.net.au Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD07160380 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED4928696 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C3BE32869D; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:42:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525F428696 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751612AbdH3Om1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:42:27 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45544 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751694AbdH3Ols (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:41:48 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4116215BE; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107985-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107985-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.210.41]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2A9B73F483; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:41:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Dietmar Eggemann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Russell King , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: exynos: add exynos5420 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:41:18 +0100 Message-Id: <20170830144120.9312-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20170830144120.9312-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> References: <20170830144120.9312-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The following 'capacity-dmips-mhz' dt property values are used: Cortex-A15: 1024, Cortex-A7: 539 They have been derived from the cpu_efficiency values: Cortex-A15: 3891, Cortex-A7: 2048 by scaling them so that the Cortex-A15s (big cores) use 1024. The cpu_efficiency values were originally derived from the "Big.LITTLE Processing with ARM Cortex™-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rdm34/big.LITTLE.pdf). Table 1 lists 1.9x (3891/2048) as the Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio for the Dhrystone benchmark. The following platforms are affected once cpu-invariant accounting support is re-connected to the task scheduler: arndale-octa, peach-pi, peach-pit, smdk5420 The patch has been tested on Samsung Chromebook 2 13" (peach-pi, Exynos 5800). $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity 1024 1024 1024 1024 389 389 389 389 The Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio is 1024/389 = 2.63. The values derived with the 'cpu_efficiency/clock-frequency dt property' solution are: $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity 1535 1535 1535 1535 448 448 448 448 The Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio is 1535/448 = 3.43. The discrepancy between 2.63 and 3.43 is due to the false assumption when using the 'cpu_efficiency/clock-frequency dt property' solution that the max cpu frequency of the little cpus is 1 GHZ and not 1.3 GHz. The Cortex-A7 cluster runs with a max cpu frequency of 1.3 GHZ whereas the 'clock-frequency' property value is set to 1 GHz. 3.43/1.3 = 2.64 $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 1800000 1800000 1800000 1800000 1300000 <-- max cpu frequency of the Cortex-A7s (little cores) 1300000 1300000 1300000 Running another benchmark (single-threaded sysbench affine to the individual cpus) with performance cpufreq governor on the Samsung Chromebook 2 13" showed the following numbers: $ for i in `seq 0 7`; do taskset -c $i sysbench --test=cpu --num-threads=1 --max-time=10 run | grep "total number of events:"; done total number of events: 1083 total number of events: 1085 total number of events: 1085 total number of events: 1085 total number of events: 454 total number of events: 454 total number of events: 454 total number of events: 454 The Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio is 2.39, i.e. very close to the one derived from the Dhrystone based one of the "Big.LITTLE Processing with ARM Cortex™-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper (2.63). We don't aim for exact values for the cpu capacity values. Besides the CPI (Cycles Per Instruction), the instruction mix and whether the system runs cpu-bound or memory-bound has an impact on the cpu capacity values derived from these benchmark results. Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Russell King Cc: Kukjin Kim Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-cpus.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-cpus.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-cpus.dtsi index 5c052d7ff554..d7d703aa1699 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-cpus.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-cpus.dtsi @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <11>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; }; cpu1: cpu@1 { @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <11>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; }; cpu2: cpu@2 { @@ -60,6 +62,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <11>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; }; cpu3: cpu@3 { @@ -72,6 +75,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <11>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; }; cpu4: cpu@100 { @@ -85,6 +89,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <7>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <539>; }; cpu5: cpu@101 { @@ -97,6 +102,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <7>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <539>; }; cpu6: cpu@102 { @@ -109,6 +115,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <7>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <539>; }; cpu7: cpu@103 { @@ -121,6 +128,7 @@ cooling-min-level = <0>; cooling-max-level = <7>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + capacity-dmips-mhz = <539>; }; }; };