diff mbox

[1/4] ARM: dts: renesas: r8a7790: Add FDP1 instances

Message ID 20180422103528.3402-2-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 5d3b50d3c04dc277258dfca02afdddd8e69ecd29
Delegated to: Simon Horman
Headers show

Commit Message

Laurent Pinchart April 22, 2018, 10:35 a.m. UTC
The r8a7790 has three FDP1 instances.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

Comments

Simon Horman April 23, 2018, 11:07 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 01:35:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The r8a7790 has three FDP1 instances.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Hi Laurent,

could you rearrange these nodes so they preserve the sorting
of sub-nodes of the soc node by bus address. The other patches
in the series seem fine in this regards and I have applied them.
Geert Uytterhoeven April 24, 2018, 3:01 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> The r8a7790 has three FDP1 instances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
> @@ -1606,6 +1606,33 @@
>                         resets = <&cpg 128>;
>                 };
>
> +               fdp1@fe940000 {

Just wondering: should we go for "display-processor@foo"?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Simon Horman April 25, 2018, 6:49 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:01:29PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> > The r8a7790 has three FDP1 instances.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks, applied.

> 
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
> > @@ -1606,6 +1606,33 @@
> >                         resets = <&cpg 128>;
> >                 };
> >
> > +               fdp1@fe940000 {
> 
> Just wondering: should we go for "display-processor@foo"?
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
>
Laurent Pinchart April 26, 2018, 9:29 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Simon,

On Monday, 23 April 2018 14:07:14 EEST Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 01:35:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The r8a7790 has three FDP1 instances.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> 
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> could you rearrange these nodes so they preserve the sorting
> of sub-nodes of the soc node by bus address. The other patches
> in the series seem fine in this regards and I have applied them.

I would have if you hadn't merged the patch already :-) Would you like me to 
submit a follow-up patch ?
Simon Horman April 30, 2018, 6:59 a.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:29:47PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Monday, 23 April 2018 14:07:14 EEST Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 01:35:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The r8a7790 has three FDP1 instances.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > Hi Laurent,
> > 
> > could you rearrange these nodes so they preserve the sorting
> > of sub-nodes of the soc node by bus address. The other patches
> > in the series seem fine in this regards and I have applied them.
> 
> I would have if you hadn't merged the patch already :-) Would you like me to 
> submit a follow-up patch ?

Sorry about that. Yes, please submit a follow-up patch.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
index e4367cecad18..9c527ddfde56 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
@@ -1606,6 +1606,33 @@ 
 			resets = <&cpg 128>;
 		};
 
+		fdp1@fe940000 {
+			compatible = "renesas,fdp1";
+			reg = <0 0xfe940000 0 0x2400>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 119>;
+			power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
+			resets = <&cpg 119>;
+		};
+
+		fdp1@fe944000 {
+			compatible = "renesas,fdp1";
+			reg = <0 0xfe944000 0 0x2400>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 263 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 118>;
+			power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
+			resets = <&cpg 118>;
+		};
+
+		fdp1@fe948000 {
+			compatible = "renesas,fdp1";
+			reg = <0 0xfe948000 0 0x2400>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 264 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 117>;
+			power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
+			resets = <&cpg 117>;
+		};
+
 		vsp@fe938000 {
 			compatible = "renesas,vsp1";
 			reg = <0 0xfe938000 0 0x8000>;