diff mbox series

[2/4] dt-bindings: i2c: rcar: Rename bindings documentation file

Message ID 20190724121559.19079-3-horms+renesas@verge.net.au (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Geert Uytterhoeven
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: i2c: renesas: Rename bindings documentation files | expand

Commit Message

Simon Horman July 24, 2019, 12:15 p.m. UTC
Rename the bindings documentation file for R-Car I2C controller
from i2c-rcar.txt to renesas,rcar.txt.

This is part of an ongoing effort to name bindings documentation files for
Renesas IP blocks consistently, in line with the compat strings they
document.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/{i2c-rcar.txt => renesas,i2c.txt} | 0
 MAINTAINERS                                                             | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/{i2c-rcar.txt => renesas,i2c.txt} (100%)

Comments

Geert Uytterhoeven July 29, 2019, 11:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:25 PM Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> Rename the bindings documentation file for R-Car I2C controller
> from i2c-rcar.txt to renesas,rcar.txt.

renesas,i2c.txt

> This is part of an ongoing effort to name bindings documentation files for
> Renesas IP blocks consistently, in line with the compat strings they
> document.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

With the above fixed:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Wolfram Sang Aug. 2, 2019, 1:36 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Geert,

> With the above fixed:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Now I understand why I applied this patch despite your request for a
change. Patchwork picked up the tag, and so I it looked to me in the
patchwork summary that this patch series was completely reviewed.

Would it be OK for you to not give the formal tag in advance but rather
describe it like "you may add my rev-by tag like in patch 1"? Or just
wait for v2 and tag?

Workflows aside, thanks for your continued reviews of patches!

Best regards,

   Wolfram
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rcar.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,i2c.txt
similarity index 100%
rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rcar.txt
rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,i2c.txt
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4c8262837da9..b8c1181baea9 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -13650,7 +13650,7 @@  F:	drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
 RENESAS R-CAR I2C DRIVERS
 M:	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 S:	Supported
-F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rcar.txt
+F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,i2c.txt
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,iic.txt
 F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
 F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c