[v3,2/2] rcar-vin: Add support for V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT}

Message ID	20191210020559.170594-3-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se (mailing list archive)
State	Accepted
Delegated to:	Kieran Bingham
Headers	show Return-Path: <SRS0=1GST=2A=vger.kernel.org=linux-renesas-soc-owner@kernel.org> Authorized-sender: niklas@soderlund.pp.se From: =?utf-8?q?Niklas_S=C3=B6derlund?= <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?q?Niklas_S=C3=B6derlund?= <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] rcar-vin: Add support for V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT} Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:05:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20191210020559.170594-3-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> In-Reply-To: <20191210020559.170594-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> References: <20191210020559.170594-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk
Series	rcar-vin: Support V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT} \| expand [v3,0/2] rcar-vin: Support V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT} [v3,1/2] rcar-vin: Move hardware buffer tracking to own struct [v3,2/2] rcar-vin: Add support for V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT}

Hi Niklas, On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 03:05:59AM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > The hardware does not support capturing the field types > V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_TB and V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_BT. To capture in these formats the > driver needs to adjust the offset of the capture buffer and capture > twice to each vb2 buffer. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > --- > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-dma.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c | 5 ++ > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h | 19 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-dma.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-dma.c > index cd1778977b2ba56e..f50b615eda36c107 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-dma.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-dma.c > @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void rvin_crop_scale_comp_gen2(struct rvin_dev *vin) > > /* Set scaling coefficient */ > crop_height = vin->crop.height; > - if (V4L2_FIELD_IS_INTERLACED(vin->format.field)) > + if (V4L2_FIELD_HAS_BOTH(vin->format.field)) > crop_height *= 2; > > ys = 0; > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void rvin_crop_scale_comp_gen2(struct rvin_dev *vin) > rvin_write(vin, 0, VNSLPOC_REG); > rvin_write(vin, vin->format.width - 1, VNEPPOC_REG); > > - if (V4L2_FIELD_IS_INTERLACED(vin->format.field)) > + if (V4L2_FIELD_HAS_BOTH(vin->format.field)) > rvin_write(vin, vin->format.height / 2 - 1, VNELPOC_REG); > else > rvin_write(vin, vin->format.height - 1, VNELPOC_REG); > @@ -626,6 +626,8 @@ static int rvin_setup(struct rvin_dev *vin) > case V4L2_FIELD_INTERLACED_BT: > vnmc = VNMC_IM_FULL | VNMC_FOC; > break; > + case V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_TB: > + case V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_BT: > case V4L2_FIELD_NONE: > vnmc = VNMC_IM_ODD_EVEN; > progressive = true; > @@ -842,15 +844,32 @@ static void rvin_fill_hw_slot(struct rvin_dev *vin, int slot) > struct rvin_buffer *buf; > struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vbuf; > dma_addr_t phys_addr; > + int prev; > > /* A already populated slot shall never be overwritten. */ > if (WARN_ON(vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer != NULL)) > return; > > - vin_dbg(vin, "Filling HW slot: %d\n", slot); > + prev = (slot == 0 ? HW_BUFFER_NUM : slot) - 1; > > - if (list_empty(&vin->buf_list)) { > + if (vin->buf_hw[prev].type == HALF_TOP) { > + vbuf = vin->buf_hw[prev].buffer; > + vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = vbuf; > + vin->buf_hw[slot].type = HALF_BOTTOM; > + switch (vin->format.pixelformat) { > + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV12: > + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV16: > + phys_addr = vin->buf_hw[prev].phys + > + vin->format.sizeimage / 4; Thanks for your reply on v2, but I'm still a bit puzzled, but it might just be my poor understanding of the issue. From your reply I get that you want to end up with: start ->+---------+ / | Y odd | | irq <- +---------+ | v | Y even | | b irq <- +---------+ | u |CbCr odd| | f irq <- +---------+ | |CbCr even| | irq <- +---------+ / and to do so you advance phys addrs by 1/4 every time. Did I get you right ? I would have expected multiplanar formats when sent as TB/BT +---------+ / | Y odd | | +---------+ | HALF_TOP |CbCr odd | | +---------+ / | Y even | | +---------+ | HALF_BOTTOM |CbCr even| | +---------+ / And the final buffer, after 2 irqs to look like start ->+---------+ / | Y odd | | +---------+ | v |CbCr odd | | b irq <- +---------+ | u | Y even | | f +---------+ | |CbCr even| | irq <- +---------+ / Have you tested NV12/NV16 ? what am I missing ? > + break; > + default: > + phys_addr = vin->buf_hw[prev].phys + > + vin->format.sizeimage / 2; Nit: please align the + signe below the =, or align vin->format with vin->buf... As you like it the most, as there are no other occurences in the diver of multi-line operations like this one. > + break; > + } > + } else if (list_empty(&vin->buf_list)) { > vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = NULL; > + vin->buf_hw[slot].type = FULL; > phys_addr = vin->scratch_phys; > } else { > /* Keep track of buffer we give to HW */ > @@ -859,10 +878,18 @@ static void rvin_fill_hw_slot(struct rvin_dev *vin, int slot) > list_del_init(to_buf_list(vbuf)); > vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = vbuf; > > + vin->buf_hw[slot].type = > + V4L2_FIELD_IS_SEQUENTIAL(vin->format.field) ? > + HALF_TOP : FULL; > + This seems sane, but do you think it would be more readable if the whole if (HALF_TOP) { } else if (list_empty(&vin->buf_list)) { } else { /* which catches HALF_BOTTOM and FULL */ } could be re-structured as: if (list_empty(&vin->buf_list)) { vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = NULL; vin->buf_hw[slot].type = FULL; vin->buf_hw[slot].phys = vin->scratch_phys; rvin_set_slot_addr(vin, slot, phys_addr); return; } switch (vin_buf_hw[prev].type) { case HALF_TOP: break; case HALF_BOTTOM: case FULL: break; } > /* Setup DMA */ Even if you want to keep the current code structure, could you drop these comments, as the same happens in the if (HALF_TOP) branch, but it's only commented here. It feels a bit weird looking at the end result > phys_addr = vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(&vbuf->vb2_buf, 0); > } > > + vin_dbg(vin, "Filling HW slot: %d type: %d buffer: %p\n", > + slot, vin->buf_hw[slot].type, vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer); > + > + vin->buf_hw[slot].phys = phys_addr; > rvin_set_slot_addr(vin, slot, phys_addr); > } > > @@ -870,6 +897,11 @@ static int rvin_capture_start(struct rvin_dev *vin) > { > int slot, ret; slot is an unsigned int Actually rvin_fill_hw_slot() takes an int. Why so ? > > + for (slot = 0; slot < HW_BUFFER_NUM; slot++) { > + vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = NULL; > + vin->buf_hw[slot].type = FULL; > + } > + > for (slot = 0; slot < HW_BUFFER_NUM; slot++) > rvin_fill_hw_slot(vin, slot); > > @@ -954,6 +986,16 @@ static irqreturn_t rvin_irq(int irq, void *data) > > /* Capture frame */ > if (vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer) { > + /* > + * Nothing to do but refill the hardware slot if > + * capture only filled first half of vb2 buffer. > + */ > + if (vin->buf_hw[slot].type == HALF_TOP) { > + vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = NULL; > + rvin_fill_hw_slot(vin, slot); Have you considered jumping to the below rvin_fill_hw_slot() which is just one line above the 'done' label you jump to here ? Could you goto fill_hw_slot; ? Bonus point if you can avoid to duplicate vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = NULL; How would something like this look like ? if (vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer) { struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *done = vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer; vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer = NULL; /* * Nothing to do but refill the hardware slot if * capture only filled first half of vb2 buffer. */ if (vin->buf_hw[slot].type == HALF_TOP) goto fill_hw_slot; done->field = rvin_get_active_field(vin, vnms); done->sequence = vin->sequence; done->vb2_buf.timestamp = ktime_get_ns(); vb2_buffer_done(&done->vb2_buf, VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE); } > + goto done; > + } > + > vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer->field = > rvin_get_active_field(vin, vnms); > vin->buf_hw[slot].buffer->sequence = vin->sequence; > @@ -981,14 +1023,22 @@ static void return_all_buffers(struct rvin_dev *vin, > enum vb2_buffer_state state) > { > struct rvin_buffer *buf, *node; > - int i; > + struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *freed[HW_BUFFER_NUM]; > + unsigned int i, n; nit: you could keep n inside the for loop if I'm not mistaken > > for (i = 0; i < HW_BUFFER_NUM; i++) { > - if (vin->buf_hw[i].buffer) { > - vb2_buffer_done(&vin->buf_hw[i].buffer->vb2_buf, > - state); > - vin->buf_hw[i].buffer = NULL; > + freed[i] = vin->buf_hw[i].buffer; > + vin->buf_hw[i].buffer = NULL; > + > + for (n = 0; n < i; n++) { > + if (freed[i] == freed[n]) { > + freed[i] = NULL; > + break; > + } > } > + > + if (freed[i]) > + vb2_buffer_done(&freed[i]->vb2_buf, state); > } > > list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, node, &vin->buf_list, list) { > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > index 9e2e63ffcc47acad..7ab938ae93826675 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > @@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ static u32 rvin_format_bytesperline(struct rvin_dev *vin, > break; > } > > + if (V4L2_FIELD_IS_SEQUENTIAL(pix->field)) > + align = 0x80; > + > return ALIGN(pix->width, align) * fmt->bpp; > } > > @@ -137,6 +140,8 @@ static void rvin_format_align(struct rvin_dev *vin, struct v4l2_pix_format *pix) > case V4L2_FIELD_INTERLACED_BT: > case V4L2_FIELD_INTERLACED: > case V4L2_FIELD_ALTERNATE: > + case V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_TB: > + case V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_BT: > break; > default: > pix->field = RVIN_DEFAULT_FIELD; > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h > index 0aa904a4af5b0a97..c19d077ce1cb4f4b 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h > @@ -60,6 +60,23 @@ enum rvin_dma_state { > STOPPING, > }; > > +/** > + * enum rvin_buffer_type > + * > + * Describes how a buffer is given to the hardware. To be able I would say that it describes how the frame's fields are expected to be received and stored into memory, with FULL describing progressive capture operations where one pass fills the whole memory buffer and HALF_TOP/HALF_BOTTOM describing sequential interlaced capture operations where to capture a full frame the same vb2 buffer has to be filled by two consective passes. > + * to capture SEQ_TB/BT it's needed to capture to the same vb2 > + * buffer twice so the type of buffer needs to be kept. > + * > + * FULL - One capture fills the whole vb2 buffer > + * HALF_TOP - One capture fills the top half of the vb2 buffer > + * HALF_BOTTOM - One capture fills the bottom half of the vb2 buffer > + */ > +enum rvin_buffer_type { > + FULL, > + HALF_TOP, > + HALF_BOTTOM, > +}; > + Even if the documentation for the VIN interface is not generated, I would use kerneldoc already. With the NV12/16 thing clarified and a confirmation that it works, all I have here are style suggestions you're free to take in or ignore, so please add Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> Thanks j > /** > * struct rvin_video_format - Data format stored in memory > * @fourcc: Pixelformat > @@ -206,6 +223,8 @@ struct rvin_dev { > spinlock_t qlock; > struct { > struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *buffer; > + enum rvin_buffer_type type; > + dma_addr_t phys; > } buf_hw[HW_BUFFER_NUM]; > struct list_head buf_list; > unsigned int sequence; > -- > 2.24.0 >

[v3,2/2] rcar-vin: Add support for V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT}

Commit Message

Comments

Patch