diff mbox series

pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

Message ID 20230310144721.1544669-1-robh@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream
Delegated to: Geert Uytterhoeven
Headers show
Series pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence | expand

Commit Message

Rob Herring March 10, 2023, 2:47 p.m. UTC
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c |  2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c         |  4 ++--
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c          |  2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c        |  4 ++--
 drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c    |  2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c    | 20 ++++++++++----------
 6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno March 13, 2023, 8:44 a.m. UTC | #1
Il 10/03/23 15:47, Rob Herring ha scritto:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Geert Uytterhoeven March 13, 2023, 9 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Rob,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>          * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
>          */
>         if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> -               if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> -                   of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> +               if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> +                   of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
>                         pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
>                         pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
>                         pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

This check is used to auto-detect if the standard property names
should be used, or the "renesas,"-prefixed ones.
As the last users of the latter were removed from DTS in v4.10,
perhaps I should just remove these checks instead?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Andre Przywara March 13, 2023, 10:17 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:20 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c         |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c          |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c        |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c    |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c    | 20 ++++++++++----------


For sunxi: Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre

>  6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> index 007b98ce5631..8649a2f9d324 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int mtk_build_gpiochip(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw)
>  	 * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt on how to
>  	 * bind pinctrl and gpio drivers via the "gpio-ranges" property.
>  	 */
> -	if (!of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
>  		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(hw->dev), 0, 0,
>  					     chip->ngpio);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> index 190923757cda..0dabbcf68b9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -939,11 +939,11 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
>  
>  	/* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
> +		if (of_property_present(np, prop2[i].name))
>  			nconfs++;
>  	}
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
> +		if (of_property_present(np, prop4[i].name))
>  			nconfs++;
>  	}
>  	if (!nconfs)
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> index 1181c4b506b1..3c031692e44d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
>  
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "gpio-ranges")) {
>  		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> index b74147800319..5c71e168b370 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  	 * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
>  	 */
>  	if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> -		    of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> +		if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> +		    of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
>  			pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
>  			pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
>  			pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> index cb33a23ab0c1..66a25becd8f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static struct irq_domain *stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(struct platform_device *pde
>  	struct device_node *parent;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
>  
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "interrupt-parent", NULL))
> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "interrupt-parent"))
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	parent = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index f35179eceb4e..1dc1882cbdd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -224,16 +224,16 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  
>  static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	return of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,pull", NULL);
> +	return of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "bias-disable") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,pull");
>  }
>  
>  static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	return of_find_property(node, "drive-strength", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,drive", NULL);
> +	return of_property_present(node, "drive-strength") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,drive");
>  }
>  
>  static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
> @@ -241,13 +241,13 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	/* Try the new style binding */
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP;
>  
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN;
>  
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-disable"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
>  
>  	/* And fall back to the old binding */
> @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_setup_debounce(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* If we don't have any setup, bail out */
> -	if (!of_find_property(node, "input-debounce", NULL))
> +	if (!of_property_present(node, "input-debounce"))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	losc = devm_clk_get(pctl->dev, "losc");
Geert Uytterhoeven March 13, 2023, 11 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:00 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> >          * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
> >          */
> >         if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> > -               if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> > -                   of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> > +               if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> > +                   of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
> >                         pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
> >                         pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
> >                         pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> This check is used to auto-detect if the standard property names
> should be used, or the "renesas,"-prefixed ones.
> As the last users of the latter were removed from DTS in v4.10,
> perhaps I should just remove these checks instead?

Sent a patch just doing that, so you can drop this chunk.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/ff9c14781110bbf19b56b45dd1f01e6da90319ad.1678704441.git.geert+renesas@glider.be

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Jernej Škrabec March 14, 2023, 8:01 p.m. UTC | #5
Dne petek, 10. marec 2023 ob 15:47:20 CET je Rob Herring napisal(a):
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c         |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c          |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c        |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c    |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c    | 20 ++++++++++----------

For sunxi:
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Jernej

>  6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c index 007b98ce5631..8649a2f9d324
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int mtk_build_gpiochip(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw)
>  	 * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt on how to
>  	 * bind pinctrl and gpio drivers via the "gpio-ranges" property.
>  	 */
> -	if (!of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
>  		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(hw->dev), 
0, 0,
>  					     chip->ngpio);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 190923757cda..0dabbcf68b9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -939,11 +939,11 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs,
> struct device_node *np,
> 
>  	/* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
> +		if (of_property_present(np, prop2[i].name))
>  			nconfs++;
>  	}
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
> +		if (of_property_present(np, prop4[i].name))
>  			nconfs++;
>  	}
>  	if (!nconfs)
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c index 1181c4b506b1..3c031692e44d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
> 
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "gpio-ranges")) {
>  		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges 
property\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c index b74147800319..5c71e168b370 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev, * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
>  	 */
>  	if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> -		    of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> +		if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> +		    of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
>  			pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
>  			pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
>  			pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c index cb33a23ab0c1..66a25becd8f5
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static struct irq_domain
> *stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(struct platform_device *pde struct device_node
> *parent;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
> 
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "interrupt-parent", NULL))
> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "interrupt-parent"))
>  		return NULL;
> 
>  	parent = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index f35179eceb4e..1dc1882cbdd7
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -224,16 +224,16 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_get_group_pins(struct
> pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> 
>  static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	return of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,pull", NULL);
> +	return of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "bias-disable") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,pull");
>  }
> 
>  static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	return of_find_property(node, "drive-strength", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,drive", NULL);
> +	return of_property_present(node, "drive-strength") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,drive");
>  }
> 
>  static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
> @@ -241,13 +241,13 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct
> device_node *node) u32 val;
> 
>  	/* Try the new style binding */
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP;
> 
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN;
> 
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-disable"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
> 
>  	/* And fall back to the old binding */
> @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_setup_debounce(struct
> sunxi_pinctrl *pctl, return 0;
> 
>  	/* If we don't have any setup, bail out */
> -	if (!of_find_property(node, "input-debounce", NULL))
> +	if (!of_property_present(node, "input-debounce"))
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	losc = devm_clk_get(pctl->dev, "losc");
Linus Walleij March 19, 2023, 8:55 p.m. UTC | #6
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:00 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > >          * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
> > >          */
> > >         if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> > > -               if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> > > -                   of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> > > +               if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> > > +                   of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
> > >                         pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
> > >                         pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
> > >                         pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >
> > This check is used to auto-detect if the standard property names
> > should be used, or the "renesas,"-prefixed ones.
> > As the last users of the latter were removed from DTS in v4.10,
> > perhaps I should just remove these checks instead?
>
> Sent a patch just doing that, so you can drop this chunk.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/ff9c14781110bbf19b56b45dd1f01e6da90319ad.1678704441.git.geert+renesas@glider.be

So I need a new version of this patch before I can apply it
I guess, or there will be conflict with Reseas stuff?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Geert Uytterhoeven March 20, 2023, 8:01 a.m. UTC | #7
Hi Linus,

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 9:55 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:00 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > > > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > > > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > > > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > > @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > > >          * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
> > > >          */
> > > >         if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> > > > -               if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> > > > -                   of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> > > > +               if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> > > > +                   of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
> > > >                         pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
> > > >                         pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
> > > >                         pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > >
> > > This check is used to auto-detect if the standard property names
> > > should be used, or the "renesas,"-prefixed ones.
> > > As the last users of the latter were removed from DTS in v4.10,
> > > perhaps I should just remove these checks instead?
> >
> > Sent a patch just doing that, so you can drop this chunk.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/ff9c14781110bbf19b56b45dd1f01e6da90319ad.1678704441.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
>
> So I need a new version of this patch before I can apply it
> I guess, or there will be conflict with Reseas stuff?

It would be a minor conflict, though, and you would have to resolve
that yourself, when merging my renesas-pinctrl PR.  So when you
will send a PR to The Other Linus, there won't be a conflict anymore,
and no angriness ;-)

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Rob Herring March 20, 2023, 6:17 p.m. UTC | #8
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 3:55 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:00 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > > > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > > > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > > > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> > > > @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > > >          * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
> > > >          */
> > > >         if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> > > > -               if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> > > > -                   of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> > > > +               if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> > > > +                   of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
> > > >                         pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
> > > >                         pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
> > > >                         pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > >
> > > This check is used to auto-detect if the standard property names
> > > should be used, or the "renesas,"-prefixed ones.
> > > As the last users of the latter were removed from DTS in v4.10,
> > > perhaps I should just remove these checks instead?
> >
> > Sent a patch just doing that, so you can drop this chunk.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/ff9c14781110bbf19b56b45dd1f01e6da90319ad.1678704441.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
>
> So I need a new version of this patch before I can apply it
> I guess, or there will be conflict with Reseas stuff?

Can you just drop drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c from this patch?

Rob
Linus Walleij March 23, 2023, 8:29 a.m. UTC | #9
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:18 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> > So I need a new version of this patch before I can apply it
> > I guess, or there will be conflict with Reseas stuff?
>
> Can you just drop drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c from this patch?

You just exposed how lazy I am ;)

OK I did that, patch applied sans the renesas hunk.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
index 007b98ce5631..8649a2f9d324 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@  static int mtk_build_gpiochip(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw)
 	 * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt on how to
 	 * bind pinctrl and gpio drivers via the "gpio-ranges" property.
 	 */
-	if (!of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+	if (!of_property_present(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
 		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(hw->dev), 0, 0,
 					     chip->ngpio);
 		if (ret < 0) {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 190923757cda..0dabbcf68b9f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -939,11 +939,11 @@  static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
 
 	/* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
-		if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
+		if (of_property_present(np, prop2[i].name))
 			nconfs++;
 	}
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
-		if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
+		if (of_property_present(np, prop4[i].name))
 			nconfs++;
 	}
 	if (!nconfs)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
index 1181c4b506b1..3c031692e44d 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@  static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
 	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
 
-	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+	if (!of_property_present(np, "gpio-ranges")) {
 		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
index b74147800319..5c71e168b370 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@  static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	 * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
 	 */
 	if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
-		if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
-		    of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
+		if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
+		    of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
 			pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
 			pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
 			pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
index cb33a23ab0c1..66a25becd8f5 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@  static struct irq_domain *stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(struct platform_device *pde
 	struct device_node *parent;
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
 
-	if (!of_find_property(np, "interrupt-parent", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(np, "interrupt-parent"))
 		return NULL;
 
 	parent = of_irq_find_parent(np);
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
index f35179eceb4e..1dc1882cbdd7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
@@ -224,16 +224,16 @@  static int sunxi_pctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 
 static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
 {
-	return of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL) ||
-		of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL) ||
-		of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL) ||
-		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,pull", NULL);
+	return of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up") ||
+		of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down") ||
+		of_property_present(node, "bias-disable") ||
+		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,pull");
 }
 
 static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(struct device_node *node)
 {
-	return of_find_property(node, "drive-strength", NULL) ||
-		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,drive", NULL);
+	return of_property_present(node, "drive-strength") ||
+		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,drive");
 }
 
 static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
@@ -241,13 +241,13 @@  static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
 	u32 val;
 
 	/* Try the new style binding */
-	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up"))
 		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP;
 
-	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down"))
 		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN;
 
-	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-disable"))
 		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
 
 	/* And fall back to the old binding */
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@  static int sunxi_pinctrl_setup_debounce(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
 		return 0;
 
 	/* If we don't have any setup, bail out */
-	if (!of_find_property(node, "input-debounce", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(node, "input-debounce"))
 		return 0;
 
 	losc = devm_clk_get(pctl->dev, "losc");