From patchwork Tue Aug 6 14:20:30 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wolfram Sang X-Patchwork-Id: 13754941 X-Patchwork-Delegate: geert@linux-m68k.org Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 248BB18D642 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722954044; cv=none; b=gqiV2dGndbuuuZ3xeeFgpN4/+8Q+URNsLDNVixG1kjs5esyXe0cIl5iTp2B2uphEvS9oZ3U4kExkoaNbih1yXd6qp32NqndZIGo9lIw0AjAo9RN+9dudxy+iZkqtgXwXsNoUBduqugXa+KOGHOjpdAtJ17YMM+2PZBP+VN7myqU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722954044; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jIOuqhgEBh6VGxaQQdjTBnedyoXCh3aKOlKNnhGoZr4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=b9XpdkH28l+dROgFlyIoZ1rT2ST1nUaXjAmd00nweU7efbqvFkLGK2AEMNfAV5VQv2wcGs+MsAEzj6rm71P2eMHMdS/v3PWCJ73SBtY+hEOoxKtmqGDWisA6+UCRSVNA3ahPWJNYInSBgm9eSBVanGPykC01pyRWfEIuogp7nCk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=YcQf7Tol; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="YcQf7Tol" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1; bh=pgj087NucnHKxua0poSb91px8mDb2gODWDuPOmjAJHI=; b=YcQf7T olB1HU2zUkNS4lit9bw0nqhHXV+gIy6Glyw+ZWpIuSqg6Ak8/ND7KTS5Up6O1b2i DRWEMAOQFr3xMQL5MuJzsHqhGMLlOtLtZbIj2dlS4sAfWDyZpZbGAEH1TgFxKY9U BbbCjvmx9DbLY8QqQdbaHboTCklM9vbVMDEfGp7g2EgZrpBgTRARTN+kxD/r3nYM 2Bl8ewoc/JVsbyNgWp9PNOiHbJDagVi+pNwskFyOzEMu3g+pOTF+dweGgZBMTJbI bVVtx1CI1lcJypcqb23aLvCkydq1pya5pvmCOWgL5yBE0k9IbQRAVhqRGiJniLPg xFZYhDTXf0tEj4xg== Received: (qmail 249166 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2024 16:20:37 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 6 Aug 2024 16:20:37 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@3r5gfwQfGIYgAwDPXxLGAIH3oZkcU6AS From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: testunit: sort case blocks Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:20:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20240806142033.2697-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240806142033.2697-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> References: <20240806142033.2697-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Because a 'fallthrough' was refactored away, the order of 'case' statements can be sorted better now to ease understanding the flow of events. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c index 4c550306f3ec..be1d2e900aef 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c @@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ static int i2c_slave_testunit_slave_cb(struct i2c_client *client, int ret = 0; switch (event) { + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED: + if (test_bit(TU_FLAG_IN_PROCESS, &tu->flags)) + return -EBUSY; + + memset(tu->regs, 0, TU_NUM_REGS); + tu->reg_idx = 0; + break; + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED: if (test_bit(TU_FLAG_IN_PROCESS, &tu->flags)) return -EBUSY; @@ -127,14 +135,6 @@ static int i2c_slave_testunit_slave_cb(struct i2c_client *client, tu->reg_idx = 0; break; - case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED: - if (test_bit(TU_FLAG_IN_PROCESS, &tu->flags)) - return -EBUSY; - - memset(tu->regs, 0, TU_NUM_REGS); - tu->reg_idx = 0; - break; - case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED: if (is_proc_call && tu->regs[TU_REG_DATAH]) tu->regs[TU_REG_DATAH]--;