diff mbox series

[net,1/5] igb: reject invalid external timestamp requests for 82580-based HW

Message ID 20250310-jk-net-fixes-supported-extts-flags-v1-1-854ffb5f3a96@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Geert Uytterhoeven
Headers show
Series net: ptp: fix egregious supported flag checks | expand

Commit Message

Jacob Keller March 10, 2025, 10:16 p.m. UTC
The igb_ptp_feature_enable_82580 function correctly checks that unknown
flags are not passed to the function. However, it does not actually check
PTP_RISING_EDGE or PTP_FALLING_EDGE when configuring the external timestamp
function.

The data sheet for the 82580 product says:

  Upon a change in the input level of one of the SDP pins that was
  configured to detect Time stamp events using the TSSDP register, a time
  stamp of the system time is captured into one of the two auxiliary time
  stamp registers (AUXSTMPL/H0 or AUXSTMPL/H1).

  For example to define timestamping of events in the AUXSTMPL0 and
  AUXSTMPH0 registers, Software should:

  1. Set the TSSDP.AUX0_SDP_SEL field to select the SDP pin that detects
     the level change and set the TSSDP.AUX0_TS_SDP_EN bit to 1.

  2. Set the TSAUXC.EN_TS0 bit to 1 to enable timestamping

The same paragraph is in the i350 and i354 data sheets.

The wording implies that the time stamps are captured at any level change.
There does not appear to be any way to only timestamp one edge of the
signal.

Reject requests which do not set both PTP_RISING_EDGE and PTP_FALLING_EDGE
when operating under PTP_STRICT_FLAGS mode via PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2.

Fixes: 38970eac41db ("igb: support EXTTS on 82580/i354/i350")
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Michal Swiatkowski March 11, 2025, 6:03 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:16:36PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> The igb_ptp_feature_enable_82580 function correctly checks that unknown
> flags are not passed to the function. However, it does not actually check
> PTP_RISING_EDGE or PTP_FALLING_EDGE when configuring the external timestamp
> function.
> 
> The data sheet for the 82580 product says:
> 
>   Upon a change in the input level of one of the SDP pins that was
>   configured to detect Time stamp events using the TSSDP register, a time
>   stamp of the system time is captured into one of the two auxiliary time
>   stamp registers (AUXSTMPL/H0 or AUXSTMPL/H1).
> 
>   For example to define timestamping of events in the AUXSTMPL0 and
>   AUXSTMPH0 registers, Software should:
> 
>   1. Set the TSSDP.AUX0_SDP_SEL field to select the SDP pin that detects
>      the level change and set the TSSDP.AUX0_TS_SDP_EN bit to 1.
> 
>   2. Set the TSAUXC.EN_TS0 bit to 1 to enable timestamping
> 
> The same paragraph is in the i350 and i354 data sheets.
> 
> The wording implies that the time stamps are captured at any level change.
> There does not appear to be any way to only timestamp one edge of the
> signal.
> 
> Reject requests which do not set both PTP_RISING_EDGE and PTP_FALLING_EDGE
> when operating under PTP_STRICT_FLAGS mode via PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2.
> 
> Fixes: 38970eac41db ("igb: support EXTTS on 82580/i354/i350")
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
> index f9457055612004c10f74379122063e8136fe7d76..b89ef4538a18d7ca11325ddc15944a878f4d807e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
> @@ -509,6 +509,11 @@ static int igb_ptp_feature_enable_82580(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
>  					PTP_STRICT_FLAGS))
>  			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> +		/* Both the rising and falling edge are timstamped */
> +		if (rq->extts.flags & PTP_STRICT_FLAGS &&
> +		    (rq->extts.flags & PTP_EXTTS_EDGES) != PTP_EXTTS_EDGES)
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  		if (on) {
>  			pin = ptp_find_pin(igb->ptp_clock, PTP_PF_EXTTS,
>  					   rq->extts.index);

Thanks for fixing
Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>

In igb_ptp_feature_enable_i210() there is the same check for both edges
but also PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE is tested. There is no need for it here, or
it is redundant even in i210?

> 
> -- 
> 2.48.1.397.gec9d649cc640
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
index f9457055612004c10f74379122063e8136fe7d76..b89ef4538a18d7ca11325ddc15944a878f4d807e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
@@ -509,6 +509,11 @@  static int igb_ptp_feature_enable_82580(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
 					PTP_STRICT_FLAGS))
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+		/* Both the rising and falling edge are timstamped */
+		if (rq->extts.flags & PTP_STRICT_FLAGS &&
+		    (rq->extts.flags & PTP_EXTTS_EDGES) != PTP_EXTTS_EDGES)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 		if (on) {
 			pin = ptp_find_pin(igb->ptp_clock, PTP_PF_EXTTS,
 					   rq->extts.index);