===================================================================
@@ -442,12 +442,22 @@ static void sh_eth_modify(struct net_dev
static void sh_eth_tsu_write(struct sh_eth_private *mdp, u32 data,
int enum_index)
{
- iowrite32(data, mdp->tsu_addr + mdp->reg_offset[enum_index]);
+ u16 offset = mdp->reg_offset[enum_index];
+
+ if (WARN_ON(offset == SH_ETH_OFFSET_INVALID))
+ return;
+
+ iowrite32(data, mdp->tsu_addr + offset);
}
static u32 sh_eth_tsu_read(struct sh_eth_private *mdp, int enum_index)
{
- return ioread32(mdp->tsu_addr + mdp->reg_offset[enum_index]);
+ u16 offset = mdp->reg_offset[enum_index];
+
+ if (WARN_ON(offset == SH_ETH_OFFSET_INVALID))
+ return ~0U;
+
+ return ioread32(mdp->tsu_addr + offset);
}
static void sh_eth_select_mii(struct net_device *ndev)
Commit 3365711df024 ("sh_eth: WARN on access to a register not implemented in a particular chip") added WARN_ON() to sh_eth_{read|write}() but not to sh_eth_tsu_{read|write}(). Now that we've routed almost all TSU register accesses (except TSU_ADR{H|L}<n> -- which are special) thru the latter pair of accessors, it makes sense to check for the unimplemented TSU registers as well... Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)