From patchwork Wed Nov 18 07:16:40 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 11913965 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8594BC5519F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7DBB2223D for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Pt2lVI3Q"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="BAXFUOga" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7DBB2223D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=miT42r11PutkbHvmK2Ctzop5lbQi67/9BHJkQ7/n/ps=; b=Pt2lVI3Q2tg18hPoZVD/vNdp5 Yo8y80dScHhBJroMX+k490Y9T8Dz9RRfpU3gMx9+sHNZgSMvk8Cxa/qUs3slTihf8kczzkomj8zk7 unHAss6N2ABf5Bc2DuzCuFPG8ug4z3qnLHWG4gWXKF/OreIrL7WQaeDQlOg4GkW1r7ldB1xssR8Fp si5FmQIuRY6C0pQXZj5sTTGgNGA4Zhy2EJK7AEdRCehJL4z/gt2NpU0lm+MznNPyUMhG7JmtQglAr x7k0nT60JRp51Jxit2dJGv1gTOHnfLBUy/5S1tlInjVbJbo0PrJdkd9Mt/PinOQ2Hv3nIWcVyRm+C fwec6bxHw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kfHiK-0005Tf-Ei; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:17:12 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kfHiH-0005Sg-KV for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:17:10 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id t21so577542pgl.3 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:17:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0w+Bq27/X0GIM1BI/NmY3YCnW8k8aSVxxtLiS5VSHa4=; b=BAXFUOgaXVa9W++H6CMOkJixDx0G47ljK4t+NNAQFx5YmxZjVgw0o88tLe/U8RW4NX 8NcG0+CeDGitGfgdPVrDierjmX6fPqWgkH3NC2pO+7dcaDjcmyY+PDTJIF2dQxfr0c0C HRUTm2+/HQgZtX0X4cwHKzNTjki5+AWY8nUwNCmSvEntvZM6EQIB9oK1tLkJL64FJiu8 at02S8TH+mKvsmILkehhskO/Nlf+qsFMgen3VSzqKtkldIZXDMX3F91BuMiuX5XCyHMN YKyHzeD8HsmpAHqhFunJJsxXx6sWGqE9TA/7u4PeiyFf5iIhDMIibUmw6xF2B7K5YRvf mJfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0w+Bq27/X0GIM1BI/NmY3YCnW8k8aSVxxtLiS5VSHa4=; b=qIMbJMm/Avn6g8ERrnOTem8CdxG2igQs8ZESPl/3+4/YShqROtpOfNRxO41su5Ca/w j4BEssH3tnvJx8M1o5cX0fOmWBZpuYIIfwxeY1AIIcNpDuRdKfHqi/N6lIFYhdydiakF 9uj9s26Hcsqv3ZVh2Tywkyf2PjpS3aZ7qQr/3hGWd+Gtwqc5unit/UJufCtZGODxtbhb lRc6pLov1UgeyuWbM/NVvaFBB3MuxhLx4PC3AAYbXr/b1lQyNFjW61Glczxk0tVJ2tOc Qifss9k251YbpQH3TlaZvvFL1acLLW/7FWgaTuUSHoY0wkKEVFikh9869elAKP/L8jqb IhnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PYg6Xqpd8/fX7EHlG0tadTazaYcu4IZMMsBUZ5pq9OjWKYpom abfzj6YjY/8mpVXclsBayQI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpbP84Y6/nHU0afdC6CD4TN367l8gQUfUEiJcxtBej/sP2oyRducY8Glp7q5EE52FJffNoVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:7895:0:b029:18b:de24:2a9d with SMTP id t143-20020a6278950000b029018bde242a9dmr3429699pfc.21.1605683827746; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:17:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from btopel-mobl.ger.intel.com ([192.55.55.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e128sm23019382pfe.154.2020.11.17.23.17.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:17:06 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Mark tests that require unaligned memory access Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:16:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20201118071640.83773-4-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201118071640.83773-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> References: <20201118071640.83773-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201118_021709_757756_6659C050 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, xi.wang@gmail.com, luke.r.nels@gmail.com Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org A lot of tests require unaligned memory access to work. Mark the tests as such, so that they can be avoided on unsupported architectures such as RISC-V. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel --- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 7 +++ .../bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c | 3 ++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c | 4 ++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c | 8 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c | 46 +++++++++++-------- 7 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c index 2ad5f974451c..fb13ca2d5606 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_ip4 field", @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_port field", @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_ip4 field", @@ -331,6 +334,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_port field", @@ -344,6 +348,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, /* invalid 1,2,4-byte reads from 8-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */ { @@ -410,6 +415,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 4-byte unaligned read from bpf_sk_lookup at even offset", @@ -422,6 +428,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, /* in-bound and out-of-bound writes to bpf_sk_lookup */ { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c index 988f46a1a4c7..c0648dc009b5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 7", @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 17", @@ -209,6 +211,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 18", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c index 637f9293bda8..b117bdd3806d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ .errstr_unpriv = "bpf_array access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN", .result = REJECT, .errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c index 95b5d70a1dc1..2978fb5a769d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c @@ -31,4 +31,5 @@ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1, }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, .errstr = "R6 invalid variable buffer offset: off=0, var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c index 006b5bd99c08..3b6ee009c00b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c @@ -675,6 +675,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock() after release", @@ -698,6 +699,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock(tp) after release", @@ -725,6 +727,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use sk after bpf_sk_release(tp)", @@ -747,6 +750,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_get_listener_sock() after bpf_sk_release(sk)", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c index 4ad7e05de706..bb0dd89dd212 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc negative", @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc src_reg negative", @@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc and spill", @@ -126,6 +129,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc and spill negative", @@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=48 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc three regs", @@ -182,6 +187,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc after call", @@ -210,6 +216,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc in callee", @@ -240,6 +247,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc, spill, JEQ", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c index ccade9312d21..55af248efa93 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err) \ +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err, flgs) \ { \ "wide store to bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \ .insns = { \ @@ -11,31 +11,36 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \ .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \ .errstr = err, \ + .flags = flgs, \ } /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 1, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0), #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE -#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err) \ +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err, flgs) \ { \ "wide load from bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \ .insns = { \ @@ -48,26 +53,31 @@ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \ .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \ .errstr = err, \ + .flags = flgs, \ } /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 1, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0), #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD