| Message ID | 20230215135205.1411105-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Support bpf trampoline for RV64 | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 13 and now 13 |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 2467 this patch: 2467 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 17312 this patch: 17312 |
| conchuod/alphanumeric_selects | success | Out of order selects before the patch: 735 and now 735 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 86 lines checked |
| conchuod/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:52:02PM +0800, Pu Lehui wrote: > From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> > > Extend patch_text for multiple instructions. This > is the preparaiton for multiple instructions text > patching in riscv bpf trampoline, and may be useful > for other scenario. In the future, please use the full width for your commit message (or fix your editor if it thinks fifty-something chars is the full width). Otherwise, looks grand... Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Thanks, Conor.
On 2023/2/16 6:37, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:52:02PM +0800, Pu Lehui wrote: >> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> >> >> Extend patch_text for multiple instructions. This >> is the preparaiton for multiple instructions text >> patching in riscv bpf trampoline, and may be useful >> for other scenario. > > In the future, please use the full width for your commit message (or > fix your editor if it thinks fifty-something chars is the full width). > Thanks Conor, will try to fix it. > Otherwise, looks grand... > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > Thanks, > Conor. >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/patch.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/patch.h index 9a7d7346001e..f433121774c0 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/patch.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/patch.h @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ #define _ASM_RISCV_PATCH_H int patch_text_nosync(void *addr, const void *insns, size_t len); -int patch_text(void *addr, u32 insn); +int patch_text(void *addr, u32 *insns, int ninsns); #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_PATCH_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c index 765004b60513..8086d1a281cd 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ struct patch_insn { void *addr; - u32 insn; + u32 *insns; + int ninsns; atomic_t cpu_count; }; @@ -102,12 +103,15 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_nosync); static int patch_text_cb(void *data) { struct patch_insn *patch = data; - int ret = 0; + unsigned long len; + int i, ret = 0; if (atomic_inc_return(&patch->cpu_count) == num_online_cpus()) { - ret = - patch_text_nosync(patch->addr, &patch->insn, - GET_INSN_LENGTH(patch->insn)); + for (i = 0; ret == 0 && i < patch->ninsns; i++) { + len = GET_INSN_LENGTH(patch->insns[i]); + ret = patch_text_nosync(patch->addr + i * len, + &patch->insns[i], len); + } atomic_inc(&patch->cpu_count); } else { while (atomic_read(&patch->cpu_count) <= num_online_cpus()) @@ -119,11 +123,12 @@ static int patch_text_cb(void *data) } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_cb); -int patch_text(void *addr, u32 insn) +int patch_text(void *addr, u32 *insns, int ninsns) { struct patch_insn patch = { .addr = addr, - .insn = insn, + .insns = insns, + .ninsns = ninsns, .cpu_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0), }; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c index 41c7481afde3..ef6d6e702485 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c @@ -23,13 +23,14 @@ post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *, struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *); static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p) { + u32 insn = __BUG_INSN_32; unsigned long offset = GET_INSN_LENGTH(p->opcode); p->ainsn.api.restore = (unsigned long)p->addr + offset; - patch_text(p->ainsn.api.insn, p->opcode); + patch_text(p->ainsn.api.insn, &p->opcode, 1); patch_text((void *)((unsigned long)(p->ainsn.api.insn) + offset), - __BUG_INSN_32); + &insn, 1); } static void __kprobes arch_prepare_simulate(struct kprobe *p) @@ -114,16 +115,16 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void) /* install breakpoint in text */ void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) { - if ((p->opcode & __INSN_LENGTH_MASK) == __INSN_LENGTH_32) - patch_text(p->addr, __BUG_INSN_32); - else - patch_text(p->addr, __BUG_INSN_16); + u32 insn = (p->opcode & __INSN_LENGTH_MASK) == __INSN_LENGTH_32 ? + __BUG_INSN_32 : __BUG_INSN_16; + + patch_text(p->addr, &insn, 1); } /* remove breakpoint from text */ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) { - patch_text(p->addr, p->opcode); + patch_text(p->addr, &p->opcode, 1); } void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)