From patchwork Tue May 30 12:49:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Conor Dooley X-Patchwork-Id: 13259994 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21FE6C7EE23 for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 12:50:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=oUXJxsVIn4DNlkpVIq3yh9c+OUmGdbp4PZeJQv4k7Pg=; b=v8dtaQi6NpRnQF rtvmnI87T1C6I5fD2XgXzHbKVADj30WzkjT6cn7/zXhVusB3UAFSO5F8R7f2g60OouaFUHpapZBdU K3WZnY06l1fWxeUmJ8vQYs79QtgGmibMI9j0Jd4MJWdY8GJPncJTAPceMj+zO352HvS7D3MvC9NAU h8BR1GR1IeshGBIiq6FbTAgNFcXeyxfK11zSc9ZJGZpblKW12C2Ta+t5SB9QVNS5nuAtdhhUNiGUM DvvM2loAXDExj/44WmpezY0Cz93d54JTgpUYxmqK3jJz+B7FF5c53guhlu5DKXPZ1WPiRSjNCHp3b hs/pshfz+s3HoVO54mtw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q3ynn-00Dvmg-1b; Tue, 30 May 2023 12:50:15 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.233]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q3ynj-00DvlO-19; Tue, 30 May 2023 12:50:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1685451011; x=1716987011; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=81Z+HN/HXj5AQPxeRiT1gdchzsxtqZSuUxHWE9CobS0=; b=n7npUfTW16bdzqm/06RoGrn6PzQCEK+mVcklZBc/bAAHnvCW4G8XqpMY 6LgxPaXwJgKw43ttao03VHV9IVARB9Eb2YyL+eCHTUb2eNhxklGH9Vy58 beLfsAPbffdnsvk8kegn3g/5oZiapm+uy2XpWusniEN9m/ONPdfZyB/cQ Z/wC6RMx0apONbM4A2a+h2MEnBLmzffNfO04APUXAI5JxkKonGEsPrD76 NfiECtpOf4L6BigRsgX1TKcw3rG9ZZNqJ/0ux3TkPE4uZxCoTN3Q2B5j8 +W9sp3/I2+kUsOB6DKP9ypQXxqbxgh0WokgcNIwZ5BM0mxfgef1Y1OlNy Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,204,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="227583731" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 30 May 2023 05:50:10 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Tue, 30 May 2023 05:50:10 -0700 Received: from wendy.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 May 2023 05:50:07 -0700 From: Conor Dooley To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation/process: add soc maintainer handbook Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 13:49:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20230530-multiple-whooping-ee5706fceb67@wendy> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=11964; i=conor.dooley@microchip.com; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=81Z+HN/HXj5AQPxeRiT1gdchzsxtqZSuUxHWE9CobS0=; b=owGbwMvMwCFWscWwfUFT0iXG02pJDCmlH+4xSB3++qBlgt5B9mzdXOsosxDHWeIvDy9/JXZdKKfq bKdZRykLgxgHg6yYIkvi7b4WqfV/XHY497yFmcPKBDaEi1MAJqL2hJFhzfcit6zZu/YuKH/LnrUs76 zt7tM2H76lBecu+me57fSO1YwMe5peThB4n6SvG6Zw1LD84DmLEJ+wY5N/TN8z6ceH3kuFrAA= X-Developer-Key: i=conor.dooley@microchip.com; a=openpgp; fpr=F9ECA03CF54F12CD01F1655722E2C55B37CF380C X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230530_055011_401889_D16ACD2E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 43.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Arnd suggested that adding a maintainer handbook for the SoC "subsystem" would be helpful in trying to bring on board maintainers for the various new platforms cropping up in RISC-V land. Add a document briefly describing the role of the SoC subsystem and some basic advice for (new) platform maintainers. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- Changes in v2: - add Krzysztof's suggested method for avoiding inter-branch dependencies - explicitly mention that tags should be signed - link to the devicetree abi document, rather than trying to explain it here & reword that whole section - fix some typos, capitalisation & unify bullet style The devicetree abi doc feels quite out of date at this point, and could probably do with a spring clean - but it also feels like hallowed ground on which one should tread lightly, so I won't go near that til Rob is back. --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.rst | 2 + .../devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst | 2 + .../process/maintainer-handbooks.rst | 3 +- Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 178 ++++++++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + 5 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.rst index a885713cf184..93ec82f78ae5 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.rst +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.rst @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +.. _devicetree-abi: + =================== Devicetree (DT) ABI =================== diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst index 4a381d20f2b4..640d857dabf3 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ installed. Ensure they are in your PATH (~/.local/bin by default). Recommended is also to install yamllint (used by dtschema when present). +.. _running-checks: + Running checks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst index d783060b4cc6..fe24cb665fb7 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst @@ -15,5 +15,6 @@ Contents: :numbered: :maxdepth: 2 - maintainer-tip maintainer-netdev + maintainer-soc + maintainer-tip diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9683c7d199b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +.. _maintainer-soc: + +============= +SoC Subsystem +============= + +Overview +-------- + +The SoC subsystem is a place of aggregation for SoC-specific code. +The main components of the subsystem are: + +* devicetrees for 32- & 64-bit ARM and RISC-V +* 32-bit ARM board files (arch/arm/mach*) +* 32- & 64-bit ARM defconfigs +* SoC specific drivers across architectures, in particular for 32- & 64-bit + ARM, RISC-V and Loongarch + +These "SoC specific drivers" do not include clock, GPIO etc drivers that have +other top-level maintainers. The drivers/soc/ directory is generally meant +for kernel-internal drivers that are used by other drivers to provide SoC +specific functionality like identifying a SoC revision or interfacing with +power domains. + +The SoC subsystem also serves as an intermediate location for changes to +drivers/bus, drivers/firmware, drivers/reset and drivers/memory. The addition +of new platforms, or the removal of existing ones, often go through the SoC +tree as a dedicated branch covering multiple subsystems. + +The main SoC tree is housed on git.kernel.org: + https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git/ + +Clearly this is quite a wide range of topics, which no one person, or even +small group of people are capable of maintaining. Instead, the SoC subsystem +is comprised of many submaintainers, each taking care of individual platforms +and driver sub-directories. +In this regard, "platform" usually refers to a series of SoCs from a given +vendor, for example, Nvidia's series of Tegra SoCs. Many submaintainers operate +on a vendor level, responsible for multiple product lines. For several reasons, +including acquisitions/different business units in a company, things vary +significantly here. The various submaintainers are documented in the +MAINTAINERS file. + +Most of these submaintainers have their own trees where they stage patches, +sending pull requests to the main SoC tree. These trees are usually, but not +always, listed in MAINTAINERS. The main SoC maintainers can be reached via the +alias soc@kernel.org if there is no platform-specific maintainer, or if they +are unresponsive. + +What the SoC tree is not, however, is a location for architecture specific code +changes. Each architecture has it's own maintainers that are responsible for +architectural details, cpu errata and the like. + +Information for (new) Submaintainers +------------------------------------ + +As new platforms spring up, they often bring with them new submaintainers, +many of whom work for the silicon vendor, and may not be familiar with the +process. + +Devicetree ABI Stability +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Perhaps one of the most important things to highlight is that dt-bindings +document the ABI between the devicetree and the kernel. Please see +:ref:`devicetree-abi` more information on the ABI. + +If changes are being made to a devicetree that are incompatible with old +kernels, the devicetree patch should not be applied until the driver is, or an +appropriate time later. Most importantly, any incompatible changes should be +clearly pointed out in the patch description and pull request, along with the +expected impact on existing users, such as bootloaders or other operating +systems. + +Driver Branch Dependencies +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +A common problem is synchronizing changes between device drivers and devicetree +files, even if a change is compatible in both directions, this may require +coordinating how the changes get merged through different maintainer trees. + +Usually the branch that includes a driver change will also include the +corresponding change to the devicetree binding description, to ensure they are +in fact compatible. This means that the devicetree branch can end up causing +warnings in the "make dtbs_check" step. If a devicetree change depends on +missing additions to a header file in include/dt-bindings/, it will fail the +"make dtbs" step and not get merged. + +There are multiple ways to deal with this: + +* Avoid defining custom macros in include/dt-bindings/ for hardware constants + that can be derived from a datasheet -- binding macros in header file should + only be used as a last resort if there is no natural way to define a binding + +* Use literal values in the devicetree file in place of macros even when a + header is required, and change them to the named representation in a + following release + +* Defer the devicetree changes to a release after the binding and driver have + already been merged + +* Change the bindings in a shared immutable branch that is used as the base for + both the driver change and the devicetree changes + +* Add duplicate defines in the devicetree file guarded by an #ifndef section, + removing them in a later release + +Devicetree Naming Convention +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The general naming scheme for devicetree files are as follows. The aspects of a +platform that are set at the SoC level, like cpu cores, are contained in a file +named $soc.dtsi, for example, jh7100.dtsi. Integration details, that will vary +from board to board, are described in $soc-$board.dtsi. An example of this is +jh7100-beaglev-starlight.dts. Often many boards are variations on a theme, and +frequently there are intermediate files, such as jh7100-common.dtsi, which sit +between the $soc.dtsi and $soc-$board.dts files, containing the descriptions of +common hardware. + +Some platforms also have System on Modules, containing an SoC, which are then +integrated into several different boards. For these platforms, $soc-$som.dtsi +and $soc-$som-$board.dts are typical. + +Directories are usually named after the vendor of the SoC at the time of it's +inclusion, leading to some historical directory names in the tree. + +Validating Devicetree Files +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +``make dtbs_check`` can be used to validate that devicetree files are compliant +with the dt-bindings that describe the ABI. Please see :ref:`running-checks` +for more information on the validation of devicetrees. + +For new platforms, or additions to existing ones, ``make dtbs_check`` should not +add any new warnings. For RISC-V, as it has the advantage of being a newer +architecture, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is required to not add any new warnings. +If in any doubt about a devicetree change, reach out to the devicetree +maintainers. + +Branches and Pull Requests +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Just as the main SoC tree has several branches, it is expected that +submaintainers will do the same. Driver, defconfig and devicetree changes should +all be split into separate branches and appear in separate pull requests to the +SoC maintainers. Each branch should be usable by itself and avoid +regressions that originate from dependencies on other branches. + +Small sets of patches can also be sent as separate emails to soc@kernel.org, +grouped into the same categories. + +If changes do not fit into the normal patterns, there can be additional +top-level branches, e.g. for a treewide rework, or the addition of new SoC +platforms including dts files and drivers. + +Branches with a lot of changes can benefit from getting split up into separate +topics branches, even if they end up getting merged into the same branch of the +SoC tree. An example here would be one branch for devicetree warning fixes, one +for a rework and one for newly added boards. + +Another common way to split up changes is to send an early pull request with the +majority of the changes at some point between rc1 and rc4, following up with one +or more smaller pull requests towards the end of the cycle that can add late +changes or address problems idenfied while testing the first set. + +While there is no cut-off time for late pull requests, it helps to only send +small branches as time gets closer to the merge window. + +Pull requests for bugfixes for the current release can be sent at any time, but +again having multiple smaller branches is better than trying to combine too many +patches into one pull request. + +The subject line of a pull request should begin with "[GIT PULL]" and made using +a signed tag, rather than a branch. This tag should contain a short description +summarising the changes in the pull request. For more detail on sending pull +requests, please see :ref:`pullrequests`. diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7e0b87d5aa2e..29631c325857 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1815,6 +1815,7 @@ L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) S: Maintained C: irc://irc.libera.chat/armlinux T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git +F: Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst F: arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile