[v15,2/5] riscv: Add static key for misaligned accesses

Commit Message

Charlie Jenkins Jan. 8, 2024, 11:57 p.m. UTC

Support static branches depending on the value of misaligned accesses.
This will be used by a later patch in the series. At any point in time,
this static branch will only be enabled if all online CPUs are
considered "fast".

Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  2 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index a418c3112cd6..7b129e5e2f07 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -133,4 +133,6 @@  static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(int cpu, const unsi
 	return __riscv_isa_extension_available(hart_isa[cpu].isa, ext);
 }
 
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_misaligned_access_speed_key);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index b3785ffc1570..b62baeb504d8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ 
 
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
+#include <linux/jump_label.h>
 #include <linux/log2.h>
 #include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -44,6 +46,8 @@  struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
 /* Performance information */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
 
+static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access;
+
 /**
  * riscv_isa_extension_base() - Get base extension word
  *
@@ -643,6 +647,16 @@  static int check_unaligned_access(void *param)
 		(speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST) ? "fast" : "slow");
 
 	per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = speed;
+
+	/*
+	 * Set the value of fast_misaligned_access of a CPU. These operations
+	 * are atomic to avoid race conditions.
+	 */
+	if (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST)
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &fast_misaligned_access);
+	else
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &fast_misaligned_access);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -655,13 +669,69 @@  static void check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu(void *param)
 		check_unaligned_access(pages[cpu]);
 }
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_misaligned_access_speed_key);
+
+static void modify_unaligned_access_branches(cpumask_t *mask, int weight)
+{
+	if (cpumask_weight(mask) == weight)
+		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&fast_misaligned_access_speed_key);
+	else
+		static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&fast_misaligned_access_speed_key);
+}
+
+static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches_except_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Same as set_unaligned_access_static_branches, except excludes the
+	 * given CPU from the result. When a CPU is hotplugged into an offline
+	 * state, this function is called before the CPU is set to offline in
+	 * the cpumask, and thus the CPU needs to be explicitly excluded.
+	 */
+
+	cpumask_t fast_except_me;
+
+	cpumask_and(&fast_except_me, &fast_misaligned_access, cpu_online_mask);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &fast_except_me);
+
+	modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_except_me, num_online_cpus() - 1);
+}
+
+static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This will be called after check_unaligned_access_all_cpus so the
+	 * result of unaligned access speed for all CPUs will be available.
+	 *
+	 * To avoid the number of online cpus changing between reading
+	 * cpu_online_mask and calling num_online_cpus, cpus_read_lock must be
+	 * held before calling this function.
+	 */
+
+	cpumask_t fast_and_online;
+
+	cpumask_and(&fast_and_online, &fast_misaligned_access, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_and_online, num_online_cpus());
+}
+
+static int lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch(void)
+{
+	cpus_read_lock();
+	set_unaligned_access_static_branches();
+	cpus_read_unlock();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+arch_initcall_sync(lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch);
+
 static int riscv_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	static struct page *buf;
 
 	/* We are already set since the last check */
 	if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN)
-		return 0;
+		goto exit;
 
 	buf = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
 	if (!buf) {
@@ -671,6 +741,17 @@  static int riscv_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	check_unaligned_access(buf);
 	__free_pages(buf, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
+
+exit:
+	set_unaligned_access_static_branches();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int riscv_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	set_unaligned_access_static_branches_except_cpu(cpu);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -705,9 +786,12 @@  static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
 	/* Check core 0. */
 	smp_call_on_cpu(0, check_unaligned_access, bufs[0], true);
 
-	/* Setup hotplug callback for any new CPUs that come online. */
+	/*
+	 * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go
+	 * offline.
+	 */
 	cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online",
-				  riscv_online_cpu, NULL);
+				  riscv_online_cpu, riscv_offline_cpu);
 
 out:
 	unaligned_emulation_finish();