From patchwork Mon Jan 15 13:12:32 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 13519616 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A41AC4707B for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:12:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aS0qW66E+AUmtPGtT8KSjYeCEajSpZGWsqYLZWlDFv8=; b=ZH0W9hDrbBUsb7 GQrvJLI/LVDgms6InB429frCA1w4uV4jvg/3FNBfMsa0brY1wDMPmJr81TkgoHYrK51RB8l5hs2du He6mXepbHVos2oskdijK0drl0pLeAkTpGvuGmQV8eGpoxSxz9VgSRWNkRNvQpiXlUGij+5ZR3nl/F zZQw5Wwg9P1h6f6QdaanRM+Q0h6rUcFkNV/yzjphBfCUdlhdbIJB6OA3kHrNGmVvsjafTZQxcnhds y9XmP3sTC/iF3ayHoUz69+r017rInuit1Mv9MadasBluOo0GHCv5nQOicTT++wgJgMnPkQPw/933+ c9IqLk1R+y422GiC8NEA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPMlI-0091I0-1b; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:12:20 +0000 Received: from [45.249.212.51] (helo=dggsgout11.his.huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPMlC-0091EP-08 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:12:17 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TDCGZ0bbjz4f3jqL for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:12:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3221A0D06 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:12:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from ultra.huawei.com (unknown [10.90.53.71]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgBnu20iL6VlSeWtAw--.15591S5; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:12:07 +0800 (CST) From: Pu Lehui To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Palmer Dabbelt , Conor Dooley , Luke Nelson , Pu Lehui , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v3 3/6] riscv, bpf: Simplify sext and zext logics in branch instructions Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:12:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20240115131235.2914289-4-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240115131235.2914289-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240115131235.2914289-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgBnu20iL6VlSeWtAw--.15591S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxZryUArWUGFWfZFWUKr47CFg_yoWrXFyDpF 1xKws3CFZ2qF4FqFyDtF1qgr15Cr40yF9rtrn3G398Jay0vrn7W3Wjkw4Fyry5X34xuw43 ZF4qyr17W3WjgrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUP014x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_JrWl82xGYIkIc2 x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0 Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJw A2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS 0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUXVWUAwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0 Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2 xKxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v2 6r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_WrylIxkGc2 Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_ Cr0_Gr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw CI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUbMq2tUU UUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: psxovxtxl6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240115_051214_413914_7274420E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Pu Lehui There are many extension helpers in the current branch instructions, and the implementation is a bit complicated. We simplify this logic through two simple extension helpers with alternate register. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui --- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 79 +++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 20deb906e495..d90784674677 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -141,6 +141,19 @@ static bool in_auipc_jalr_range(s64 val) val < ((1L << 31) - (1L << 11)); } +/* Modify rd pointer to alternate reg to avoid corrupting original reg */ +static void emit_sextw_alt(u8 *rd, u8 ra, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) +{ + emit_sextw(ra, *rd, ctx); + *rd = ra; +} + +static void emit_zextw_alt(u8 *rd, u8 ra, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) +{ + emit_zextw(ra, *rd, ctx); + *rd = ra; +} + /* Emit fixed-length instructions for address */ static int emit_addr(u8 rd, u64 addr, bool extra_pass, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) { @@ -399,38 +412,6 @@ static void init_regs(u8 *rd, u8 *rs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, *rs = bpf_to_rv_reg(insn->src_reg, ctx); } -static void emit_zext_32_rd_rs(u8 *rd, u8 *rs, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) -{ - emit_mv(RV_REG_T2, *rd, ctx); - emit_zextw(RV_REG_T2, RV_REG_T2, ctx); - emit_mv(RV_REG_T1, *rs, ctx); - emit_zextw(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_T1, ctx); - *rd = RV_REG_T2; - *rs = RV_REG_T1; -} - -static void emit_sext_32_rd_rs(u8 *rd, u8 *rs, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) -{ - emit_sextw(RV_REG_T2, *rd, ctx); - emit_sextw(RV_REG_T1, *rs, ctx); - *rd = RV_REG_T2; - *rs = RV_REG_T1; -} - -static void emit_zext_32_rd_t1(u8 *rd, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) -{ - emit_mv(RV_REG_T2, *rd, ctx); - emit_zextw(RV_REG_T2, RV_REG_T2, ctx); - emit_zextw(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_T2, ctx); - *rd = RV_REG_T2; -} - -static void emit_sext_32_rd(u8 *rd, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) -{ - emit_sextw(RV_REG_T2, *rd, ctx); - *rd = RV_REG_T2; -} - static int emit_jump_and_link(u8 rd, s64 rvoff, bool fixed_addr, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) { @@ -1418,10 +1399,13 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx); if (!is64) { s = ctx->ninsns; - if (is_signed_bpf_cond(BPF_OP(code))) - emit_sext_32_rd_rs(&rd, &rs, ctx); - else - emit_zext_32_rd_rs(&rd, &rs, ctx); + if (is_signed_bpf_cond(BPF_OP(code))) { + emit_sextw_alt(&rs, RV_REG_T1, ctx); + emit_sextw_alt(&rd, RV_REG_T2, ctx); + } else { + emit_zextw_alt(&rs, RV_REG_T1, ctx); + emit_zextw_alt(&rd, RV_REG_T2, ctx); + } e = ctx->ninsns; /* Adjust for extra insns */ @@ -1432,8 +1416,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, /* Adjust for and */ rvoff -= 4; emit_and(RV_REG_T1, rd, rs, ctx); - emit_branch(BPF_JNE, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, - ctx); + emit_branch(BPF_JNE, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, ctx); } else { emit_branch(BPF_OP(code), rd, rs, rvoff, ctx); } @@ -1462,18 +1445,18 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K: rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx); s = ctx->ninsns; - if (imm) { + if (imm) emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, imm, ctx); - rs = RV_REG_T1; - } else { - /* If imm is 0, simply use zero register. */ - rs = RV_REG_ZERO; - } + rs = imm ? RV_REG_T1 : RV_REG_ZERO; if (!is64) { - if (is_signed_bpf_cond(BPF_OP(code))) - emit_sext_32_rd(&rd, ctx); - else - emit_zext_32_rd_t1(&rd, ctx); + if (is_signed_bpf_cond(BPF_OP(code))) { + emit_sextw_alt(&rd, RV_REG_T2, ctx); + /* rs has been sign extended */ + } else { + emit_zextw_alt(&rd, RV_REG_T2, ctx); + if (imm) + emit_zextw(rs, rs, ctx); + } } e = ctx->ninsns;