From patchwork Wed Jul 17 18:07:26 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jesse Taube X-Patchwork-Id: 13735710 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76406C3DA60 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:08:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=J8D6GNHy9/kdiPX5J2uYeThdmltYP+jabFB+Vg6UAxY=; b=jYXwM91BVNR4yr 10TyK//a4xmKzTe30erv5EL4zSABwTf0biUg+oLN4jNG9+g3tf/qOjjk68CKzTqvEoeNefIG/0uBi 6AOjfQr/n7ueRkiRrdIqfU4uEvNR0ufFT8sU3KbNe536X302fc+bSw/yyo2NaZWjorHZmgN8douY4 2bvaFNWaC0nSm7fIV+qC5hB6kYQVwroqvMLL8GS1hGwMPVFw/fP61UxCuVO3/EGVqaee6uMgi04+J Q4jqilaDW4riTCM4GdpdrDs3MuUVhk+OUfJcZb9II+YvOr/ExOEpbkvOC52p5iNIzldjbdBl6XcDe 0s10V+YY38xtGjaUqhDw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sU94P-0000000EZ8F-0lwG; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:08:05 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sU94K-0000000EZ3s-1AFc for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:08:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70b0e9ee7bcso5357847b3a.1 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:08:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1721239679; x=1721844479; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ROgm5HPdaWPlyYWu6RL+OgucK89Ivfs2gWf71tkA+S4=; b=rfp0X0vQqUbwHXK1Nh9S0CJL5+R6EySZPBhhlbwk6d7dJcyFbG4CqKkWWZaOq091CZ 1NBw5CE0AqlK7Zr3xL1ESp2ydt/e0h7A45o6syT8Unw31ZzT3V0fhK38Xib90spLHQ2u VxhGFlZQXG5bqrAlgp64iefIDJvQZudvajtvCWHWPtXeRdKUDR7zFe/JxlP2f6ow6kqx sj9MVKpUn34xpK8Rhy+6ihfcWHQlzKDMuMSVkAED7vcPWTvlNcE0vVr7vI/p+57VZjXG qsWdXJDkPNwBKRvBaiaiOt4F3vCcYKPOOW/tWvlo1IQ8KU8jF2rCEEX5o624AYh/o5ir YpRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721239679; x=1721844479; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ROgm5HPdaWPlyYWu6RL+OgucK89Ivfs2gWf71tkA+S4=; b=oqP8S82SD804yDT8EWOj3P5gdhIFSycu5qYX4738pXlY4Kn0HmAV8pB+UK+3oIiI4B SgxEd/ebYV4oorzZTznk+a/q4pA4o32H6akfT7mDSnoYkf8RQ6/DecTqA954vgfoTER5 2HE+FDTmDFZ0RtSMBk/qqrPOesTUYAIDrh9VUOq1vdKRNP9G+UUyZdBN6thI7sjTAR1u 0VNJzpMqNKC0mTI4n4fUk0IHfTwABMe1VMicDcwo6VQkXC7VV935J6lHsKyXw2OsVchJ aCdhb9ECuEmHTjPd6TERAanRCRrb7HtBU4I2plZ1vfFoq/03URqTzOAtu0xIVFnQZG2g shlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxpUcUTp6vri/knEtcdZCKy/3304bjRLfPEj23xj4ZfQxFzFgNo BCjzH0qObB+AkvHw30LMrxnajQlnAfKw8Z+BsUAko8rBEVlwaMGWw0Yrn1y9e/ng2BXphgxBNnX l X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFqrrQF4l7oZG1yEXUN0aw7QFYQNdB3xW+50xYxkOriNcAHPqcPBtEoQsU+0P4dyEdLTobCXg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4b15:b0:704:23dc:6473 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70ce503648amr2612201b3a.30.1721239679337; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jesse-desktop.ba.rivosinc.com (pool-108-26-179-17.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [108.26.179.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-70b7eb9c969sm8432332b3a.35.2024.07.17.11.07.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:07:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Jesse Taube To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , =?utf-8?b?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2Vy?= , Evan Green , Andrew Jones , Jesse Taube , Charlie Jenkins , Xiao Wang , Andy Chiu , Eric Biggers , Greentime Hu , =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Heiko Stuebner , Costa Shulyupin , Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , Anup Patel , Zong Li , Sami Tolvanen , Ben Dooks , Alexandre Ghiti , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Erick Archer , Joel Granados , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 6/7] RISC-V: Report vector unaligned access speed hwprobe Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:07:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20240717180727.4180475-7-jesse@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 In-Reply-To: <20240717180727.4180475-1-jesse@rivosinc.com> References: <20240717180727.4180475-1-jesse@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240717_110800_378264_4BD20BB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Detect if vector misaligned accesses are faster or slower than equivalent vector byte accesses. This is useful for usermode to know whether vector byte accesses or vector misaligned accesses have a better bandwidth for operations like memcpy. Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins --- V1 -> V2: - Add Kconfig options - Add WORD_EEW to vec-copy-unaligned.S V2 -> V3: - Remove unnecessary comment - Remove local_irq_enable V3 -> V4: - Add preempt_disable/enable - Alphabetize includes in vec-copy-unaligned.S and unaligned_access_speed.c - Add duplicate comments above mb() to please checkpatch - change all_cpus_vec_supported to all_cpus_vec_unsupported so speed is tested if any cpus support unaligned vector accesses - Spell out _VECTOR_ in macros V4 -> V5: - Change void *unused to void *unused __always_unused --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 18 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 3 +- arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h | 5 + arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 6 + arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S | 58 +++++++++ 6 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index ffbe0fdd7fb3..e98139340c1c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -807,6 +807,24 @@ config RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS will dynamically determine the speed of vector unaligned accesses on the underlying system if they are supported. +config RISCV_SLOW_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Assume the system supports slow vector unaligned memory accesses" + depends on NONPORTABLE + help + Assume that the system supports slow vector unaligned memory accesses. The + kernel and userspace programs may not be able to run at all on systems + that do not support unaligned memory accesses. + +config RISCV_EFFICIENT_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Assume the system supports fast vector unaligned memory accesses" + depends on NONPORTABLE + help + Assume that the system supports fast vector unaligned memory accesses. When + enabled, this option improves the performance of the kernel on such + systems. However, the kernel and userspace programs will run much more + slowly, or will not be able to run at all, on systems that do not + support efficient unaligned memory accesses. + endchoice endmenu # "Platform type" diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile index 5b243d46f4b1..291935a084d5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/ obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += vec-copy-unaligned.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += fpu.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += kernel_mode_fpu.o diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h index e3d70d35b708..85d4d11450cb 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/copy-unaligned.h @@ -10,4 +10,9 @@ void __riscv_copy_words_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); void __riscv_copy_bytes_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +void __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); +void __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size); +#endif + #endif /* __RISCV_KERNEL_COPY_UNALIGNED_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c index 2e3e324bad38..99d3e63d0444 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c @@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) #else static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) { + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_EFFICIENT_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_FAST; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SLOW_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_SLOW; + return RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN; } #endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c index 24b8883a23f0..532e9151685b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c @@ -6,11 +6,13 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include #include #include +#include #include "copy-unaligned.h" @@ -267,12 +269,140 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void) } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +static void check_vector_unaligned_access(struct work_struct *work __always_unused) +{ + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + u64 start_cycles, end_cycles; + u64 word_cycles; + u64 byte_cycles; + int ratio; + unsigned long start_jiffies, now; + struct page *page; + void *dst; + void *src; + long speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_SLOW; + + if (per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_SLOW) + return; + + page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); + if (!page) { + pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring vector misaligned performance\n"); + return; + } + + /* Make an unaligned destination buffer. */ + dst = (void *)((unsigned long)page_address(page) | 0x1); + /* Unalign src as well, but differently (off by 1 + 2 = 3). */ + src = dst + (MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2); + src += 2; + word_cycles = -1ULL; + + /* Do a warmup. */ + kernel_vector_begin(); + __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + + start_jiffies = jiffies; + while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) + cpu_relax(); + + /* + * For a fixed amount of time, repeatedly try the function, and take + * the best time in cycles as the measurement. + */ + while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + start_cycles = get_cycles64(); + /* Ensure the CSR read can't reorder WRT to the copy. */ + mb(); + __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + /* Ensure the copy ends before the end time is snapped. */ + mb(); + end_cycles = get_cycles64(); + if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < word_cycles) + word_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; + } + + byte_cycles = -1ULL; + __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + start_jiffies = jiffies; + while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) + cpu_relax(); + + while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + start_cycles = get_cycles64(); + /* Ensure the CSR read can't reorder WRT to the copy. */ + mb(); + __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + /* Ensure the copy ends before the end time is snapped. */ + mb(); + end_cycles = get_cycles64(); + if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < byte_cycles) + byte_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; + } + + kernel_vector_end(); + + /* Don't divide by zero. */ + if (!word_cycles || !byte_cycles) { + pr_warn("cpu%d: rdtime lacks granularity needed to measure unaligned vector access speed\n", + cpu); + + return; + } + + if (word_cycles < byte_cycles) + speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_FAST; + + ratio = div_u64((byte_cycles * 100), word_cycles); + pr_info("cpu%d: Ratio of vector byte access time to vector unaligned word access is %d.%02d, unaligned accesses are %s\n", + cpu, + ratio / 100, + ratio % 100, + (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_FAST) ? "fast" : "slow"); + + per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = speed; +} + +static int riscv_online_cpu_vec(unsigned int cpu) +{ + check_vector_unaligned_access(NULL); + return 0; +} + +/* Measure unaligned access speed on all CPUs present at boot in parallel. */ +static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused) +{ + schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access); + + /* + * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go + * offline. + */ + cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online", + riscv_online_cpu_vec, NULL); + + return 0; +} +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ +static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) { - bool all_cpus_emulated; + bool all_cpus_emulated, all_cpus_vec_unsupported; all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); - check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + all_cpus_vec_unsupported = check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + + if (!all_cpus_vec_unsupported && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) { + kthread_run(vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus, + NULL, "vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus"); + } if (!all_cpus_emulated) return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d16f19f1b3b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vec-copy-unaligned.S @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* Copyright (C) 2024 Rivos Inc. */ + +#include +#include +#include + + .text + +#define WORD_EEW 32 + +#define WORD_SEW CONCATENATE(e, WORD_EEW) +#define VEC_L CONCATENATE(vle, WORD_EEW).v +#define VEC_S CONCATENATE(vle, WORD_EEW).v + +/* void __riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned(void *, const void *, size_t) */ +/* Performs a memcpy without aligning buffers, using word loads and stores. */ +/* Note: The size is truncated to a multiple of WORD_EEW */ +SYM_FUNC_START(__riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned) + andi a4, a2, ~(WORD_EEW-1) + beqz a4, 2f + add a3, a1, a4 + .option push + .option arch, +zve32x +1: + vsetivli t0, 8, WORD_SEW, m8, ta, ma + VEC_L v0, (a1) + VEC_S v0, (a0) + addi a0, a0, WORD_EEW + addi a1, a1, WORD_EEW + bltu a1, a3, 1b + +2: + .option pop + ret +SYM_FUNC_END(__riscv_copy_vec_words_unaligned) + +/* void __riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned(void *, const void *, size_t) */ +/* Performs a memcpy without aligning buffers, using only byte accesses. */ +/* Note: The size is truncated to a multiple of 8 */ +SYM_FUNC_START(__riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned) + andi a4, a2, ~(8-1) + beqz a4, 2f + add a3, a1, a4 + .option push + .option arch, +zve32x +1: + vsetivli t0, 8, e8, m8, ta, ma + vle8.v v0, (a1) + vse8.v v0, (a0) + addi a0, a0, 8 + addi a1, a1, 8 + bltu a1, a3, 1b + +2: + .option pop + ret +SYM_FUNC_END(__riscv_copy_vec_bytes_unaligned)