From patchwork Wed Aug 28 23:27:47 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Brown X-Patchwork-Id: 13782273 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD1BC7114C for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:54:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Message-Id :MIME-Version:Subject:Date:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=tMGBQfJxuFS3BtnQ+ohWBPAsPVsfgtCv1Ma4YR9DKEU=; b=RO84wjx3FaVco5 CRy8JIYz1Adytr+qVM8+3wSwdlDf6NM+MDzUQNhP44+7Yiz2vmVqPKGmarrBa80Lp1/k1nRhRK8Gu /IhioqWiguLt4ivONUIijr3vyueusAwooXs+l8gVXVOX0vw5UDhYry1sAmlMjnGL1gvy9bs/EOE06 Umd0UIpuUqBRlN3VRUsGK6+Tm5TuOkgi8zDVjBUJ+QRoAhOMzvUcyvZfX+Xzuvb089kp7QOTMmbdR ZMJAu5S6MZyFe9uNEGZwYNc8vtfPeLwHbnsv8fWnp4Zr2jvjiH5cwjBHTUM1nL696sRPIb7pDAClk jaTAHwn5s6BQMH3naDvg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sjSUk-0000000HVR7-2pZk; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:54:34 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sjS9F-0000000HNSb-1LtO; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:32:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE0BA4376E; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85AF0C4CEC5; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724887940; bh=+guAOBhRmIfgEVfzNIbxa5iAcbQBA9Aonxf7B+eDgYE=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=mYJe13cCUAHARL1CWqT1BgfDlcv7adYh9FxliVzqNDnkENqaEdRFg4gf+QU876eN1 hTLNncMv7W8Blec6WcUB7/lhi2h0t7oOjnOymS0lB/SZ5DYbrZyIP3o9RQkwJi76CW nOUNkKcd9i/UVkj5GQDpicO42UUBmWRl14SRpEvuUez7693SZSrlXx820LTYxLhA3N RvMZOCAoOlJ3MofkWapQM5llTBnqGhM7e8lHUhjg9AdgZo376ndy04e7pva4QNGVcU CyhcXVg1/vjBp2PMrSmhwxQkHVFv+XIelOryNNaNGtnv6UbSLUhBxVRbvqLpRIPw5M BC5jNKj3ovaxg== From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:27:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v12 31/39] kselftest/arm64: Allow signals tests to specify an expected si_code MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240829-arm64-gcs-v12-31-42fec947436a@kernel.org> References: <20240829-arm64-gcs-v12-0-42fec947436a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240829-arm64-gcs-v12-0-42fec947436a@kernel.org> To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Arnd Bergmann , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Shuah Khan , "Rick P. Edgecombe" , Deepak Gupta , Ard Biesheuvel , Szabolcs Nagy , Kees Cook Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Florian Weimer , Christian Brauner , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Ross Burton , Yury Khrustalev , Wilco Dijkstra , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-37811 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=2693; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=+guAOBhRmIfgEVfzNIbxa5iAcbQBA9Aonxf7B+eDgYE=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBmz7KQCFbH8GgemeGlaxEGmkFQPOyVAW5zlSKGCkPe TC/SSHmJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCZs+ykAAKCRAk1otyXVSH0FYSB/ 9i6Gf1wBh2Mvivv3bYMVyB8zLutwqFWzWS40EKXV9jJHHzGP8C7wWEliOWcRmaoiT0REmwwUKXEyTW hiyNKOSzrKj3G4ba1GPS+2v63FX+qk+BxwwErnk9pKTQhcVqMDV0kdbzYPvH1u34hcXi3mPmAGPMbn 6ggZ3Is18d/MeihAfiUMf7JR4/DgLw3ofFxDzIhZ8GjKA4DWZ2vf8OeZ8MpnAjweir2shXMLmdNHGN Tz9NVOM4VQd/FoJirFf2s1reQYDUPQHxixh+jpz6YZ5JgaFcHl8VSG8ZOcpyfW/kjLJlGclny+Tgrd pEF9KRG4QWSf7NfmUESIWRK3Nb1731 X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240828_163221_619066_1D34B8F9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Currently we ignore si_code unless the expected signal is a SIGSEGV, in which case we enforce it being SEGV_ACCERR. Allow test cases to specify exactly which si_code should be generated so we can validate this, and test for other segfault codes. Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h | 4 +++ .../selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c | 29 ++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h index 7ada43688c02..ee75a2c25ce7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ struct tdescr { * Zero when no signal is expected on success */ int sig_ok; + /* + * expected si_code for sig_ok, or 0 to not check + */ + int sig_ok_code; /* signum expected on unsupported CPU features. */ int sig_unsupp; /* a timeout in second for test completion */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c index 89ef95c1af0e..63deca32b0df 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c @@ -143,16 +143,25 @@ static bool handle_signal_ok(struct tdescr *td, "current->token ZEROED...test is probably broken!\n"); abort(); } - /* - * Trying to narrow down the SEGV to the ones generated by Kernel itself - * via arm64_notify_segfault(). This is a best-effort check anyway, and - * the si_code check may need to change if this aspect of the kernel - * ABI changes. - */ - if (td->sig_ok == SIGSEGV && si->si_code != SEGV_ACCERR) { - fprintf(stdout, - "si_code != SEGV_ACCERR...test is probably broken!\n"); - abort(); + if (td->sig_ok_code) { + if (si->si_code != td->sig_ok_code) { + fprintf(stdout, "si_code is %d not %d\n", + si->si_code, td->sig_ok_code); + abort(); + } + } else { + /* + * Trying to narrow down the SEGV to the ones + * generated by Kernel itself via + * arm64_notify_segfault(). This is a best-effort + * check anyway, and the si_code check may need to + * change if this aspect of the kernel ABI changes. + */ + if (td->sig_ok == SIGSEGV && si->si_code != SEGV_ACCERR) { + fprintf(stdout, + "si_code != SEGV_ACCERR...test is probably broken!\n"); + abort(); + } } td->pass = 1; /*