From patchwork Thu Sep 12 23:16:38 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13802865 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 290A0EEE273 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:18:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cQk20xsqfI8j/+SlaH8lb3TI1UP9jEg2SzM1TEQfy1I=; b=m4RtqHZk92uexb oQutWQ3zE7M2bJViV+RSd4yy8+g1pu/KXwf+MxJg6568RvIM3eaFJ2vCJKK10EDa7hMqDLEbTxevQ FX421jBps2OdtepqvqAv80qTI2xbe3zVNC3slip480wW11URC0WVlSHLnadVRj6Db+zA3pz5xJpak LcddAhPVRhZi+UNRweOmJiXZNvLErNKIXN6ebwG98uWhs7EM+Cb0CRo9HHUNaoW55prSr19z1fmiE HBRtyHsuWwzfvDytP6CRJBfAJPSBB+jct3YnuMgBEHOB5MBmcFAYiMpswvwf3mH2xuQJfQjPaV4fK QYC5OPdSLXjwMZWoP9yA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sot5B-0000000ES6G-2tZZ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:18:37 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sot54-0000000ERzb-0u75 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:18:34 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d8815ef6d2so1277114a91.0 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1726183109; x=1726787909; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dxl+asrYZyMA5EObtActYQsQI9/7SQp4qXUW6BzcbN8=; b=vsCAyDcKwdPL7egbMLtM7g+7jG60UBaokf00NP7Hdu87KmY4hYB8Hhi8tIGH9gYN+U IrZNDHrfSQ2YvOwqNehCbny7f+2LJ+0/O8Mhfbz7VYNTxN8cSy5yqaIhSBLVYXDDKEgF lX84IlmZhs9JTGBK0Z/WAUora5aY5q1XjbbAjYla7TPo+3zT3ILvE16PqkuIehSRlyxO Z6OxM2ksVt8WNPw48FAPs2AJHyvK6T1k7Czj9XrAik62cJ7vYUhHUqt+iaSKk/N4aQ9x q2yu8rzEql/D8tMX2LOEJAbUMa0uCpdGvOIbrXKNuoxO+bpRVTeT3FdbkbOY0AZzMgRC tM9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726183109; x=1726787909; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dxl+asrYZyMA5EObtActYQsQI9/7SQp4qXUW6BzcbN8=; b=eM5X8ISN+5yPTuY5eb6/1xaG3GUh297dIO9Y8x2Q/uQkIfDo12Nj4opjzw2pcHu+mG HW7iRDW+wooI1LWdUKv86SLGtsNf2i1bIOxTpUaNDRJfCqVjk9SF9b64GklCdP9QMb+M OZK+rUUlJ/9Vz6nTVG4ZCBjiFxYEPXSd9P9/JQQ01SZCig6BEXYDKnkIK5hwBUTit8TM 6B2K2wMKo8RgFwaoqO6kRd81DS9TY16EVChi85zt+kkGSJNjoXfpEANrW5CWmOTpgB84 /Y5KIhq6uIpDWSE6Gtt4apFma4TEvydLz4f2chACjislVJqHKaUcqahcsYECvuU5u5W9 Fv5w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXmaiGG/yDtPioU/QmcEgjC/5jlTwUJa3Hf62GOK88dUURhX3tiiK5oZMWncV1kYrdY/XVTaq0EQarSLg==@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwA236Tb+gCkJ62g1NaKnQ1Iiobn5vQgUgoJzPMSUSpsSxPkM0O IM1N6PCxgynM5aCQ0F+3lTJEBMc4IV2eDjw57ZNp9iBqiE/pDKE73laYoFfrJh8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEa4TPR9k56uhVbKEFp8flznEgSz0stUKrf5zCJaY7PljtKC23HwZsb6NuQgT/7g1yg03P/9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:716:b0:2d8:92c7:d336 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2db9fff0ebamr5713630a91.22.1726183109149; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2db6c1ac69asm3157591a91.0.2024.09.12.16.18.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:18:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@sifive.com, conor@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 19/30] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:16:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20240912231650.3740732-20-debug@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.0 In-Reply-To: <20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com> References: <20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240912_161830_773526_C82390C6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com, zong.li@sifive.com, zev@bewilderbeest.net, david@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, bjorn@rivosinc.com, namcaov@gmail.com, usama.anjum@collabora.com, guoren@kernel.org, alx@kernel.org, jszhang@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, puranjay@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, sorear@fastmail.com, costa.shul@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, antonb@tenstorrent.com, quic_bjorande@quicinc.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, corbet@lwn.net, dawei.li@shingroup.cn, anup@brainfault.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, kees@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, libang.li@antgroup.com, samitolvanen@google.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com, osalvador@suse.de, ajones@ventanamicro.com, revest@chromium.org, ancientmodern4@gmail.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, jerry.shih@sifive.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, arnd@arndb.de, yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, bgray@linux.ibm.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, leobras@redhat.com, songshuaishuai@tinylab.org, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, mchitale@ventanamicro.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, tglx@linutronix.de, krzk+dt@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, debug@rivosinc.com, brauner@kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, ke.zhao@shingroup.cn, oleg@redhat.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com, ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, evan@rivosinc.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, schwab@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sameo@rivosinc.com, tanzhasanwork@gmail.com, rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Implement architecture agnostic prctls() interface for setting and getting shadow stack status. prctls implemented are PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. As part of PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS/PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, only PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE is implemented because RISCV allows each mode to write to their own shadow stack using `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS locks current configuration of shadow stack enabling. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 30 ++++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 8 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h index a6974307ca6c..6d806fbb283d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +#include struct task_struct; struct kernel_clone_args; @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ struct kernel_clone_args; #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ - unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 1); + unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1; + unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 2); unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */ unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */ unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ @@ -27,6 +29,12 @@ void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size); void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable); + +#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) #else @@ -62,6 +70,26 @@ static inline bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return false; } +static inline bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return false; +} + +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return false; +} + +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + +} + +static inline void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + +} + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index 6747db72435a..b64baa0235ea 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -143,6 +143,14 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc, regs->epc = pc; regs->sp = sp; + /* + * clear shadow stack state on exec. + * libc will set it later via prctl. + */ + set_shstk_status(current, false); + set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0); + set_active_shstk(current, 0); + #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT regs->status &= ~SR_UXL; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index 7a7f0b57b2d4..c77abe552c88 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false; } +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base ? true : false; +} + +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked ? true : false; +} + void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size) { task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr; @@ -42,6 +52,23 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr; } +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0; + + if (enable) + task->thread_info.envcfg |= ENVCFG_SSE; + else + task->thread_info.envcfg &= ~ENVCFG_SSE; + + csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread_info.envcfg); +} + +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked = 1; +} + /* * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back @@ -264,3 +291,83 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) vm_munmap(base, size); set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); } + +int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status) +{ + unsigned long bcfi_status = 0; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* this means shadow stack is enabled on the task */ + bcfi_status |= (is_shstk_enabled(t) ? PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE : 0); + + return copy_to_user(status, &bcfi_status, sizeof(bcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT : 0; +} + +int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + unsigned long size = 0, addr = 0; + bool enable_shstk = false; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Reject unknown flags */ + if (status & ~PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK) + return -EINVAL; + + /* bcfi status is locked and further can't be modified by user */ + if (is_shstk_locked(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + enable_shstk = status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE; + /* Request is to enable shadow stack and shadow stack is not enabled already */ + if (enable_shstk && !is_shstk_enabled(t)) { + /* shadow stack was allocated and enable request again + * no need to support such usecase and return EINVAL. + */ + if (is_shstk_allocated(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + size = calc_shstk_size(0); + addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return -ENOMEM; + set_shstk_base(t, addr, size); + set_active_shstk(t, addr + size); + } + + /* + * If a request to disable shadow stack happens, let's go ahead and release it + * Although, if CLONE_VFORKed child did this, then in that case we will end up + * not releasing the shadow stack (because it might be needed in parent). Although + * we will disable it for VFORKed child. And if VFORKed child tries to enable again + * then in that case, it'll get entirely new shadow stack because following condition + * are true + * - shadow stack was not enabled for vforked child + * - shadow stack base was anyways pointing to 0 + * This shouldn't be a big issue because we want parent to have availability of shadow + * stack whenever VFORKed child releases resources via exit or exec but at the same + * time we want VFORKed child to break away and establish new shadow stack if it desires + * + */ + if (!enable_shstk) + shstk_release(t); + + set_shstk_status(t, enable_shstk); + return 0; +} + +int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long arg) +{ + /* If shtstk not supported or not enabled on task, nothing to lock here */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(task)) + return -EINVAL; + + set_shstk_lock(task); + + return 0; +}