| Message ID | 450cb59db52ebeaa68f3d77f1bd995618f3612b8.1686275310.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 748462b59f90 |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 6 and now 6 |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 48 lines checked |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 10:12:15AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > Add some unfortunate #ifdeffery to ensure the common get-reg-list.c > can be compiled and run with other architectures. The next > architecture to support get-reg-list should now only need to provide > $(ARCH_DIR)/get-reg-list.c where arch-specific print_reg() and > vcpu_configs[] get defined. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > index 69bb91087081..c4bd5a5259da 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) > printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); > } > > +#ifdef __aarch64__ > static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > { > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > @@ -120,6 +121,24 @@ static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > } > } > > +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) > +{ > + struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > + > + prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); > + vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > + aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); > + > + return vcpu; > +} > +#else > +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) > +{ > + return __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > +} > +#endif > + > static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > { > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > @@ -139,7 +158,6 @@ static bool print_filtered; > > static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > { > - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; > int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; > int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > @@ -149,9 +167,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > check_supported(c); > > vm = vm_create_barebones(); > - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); > - vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > - aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); > + vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm); > finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); I just noticed that this has been modified from what I posted to leave the finalize_vcpu() call here, despite it now being inside the #ifdef __aarch64__. That breaks the purpose of the patch. Please make sure this file compiles for other architectures without requiring additional patches, which would keep the commit message honest. You can either revert this to what I posted, and then readd the finalize_vcpu() call in another patch, or you can add a finalize_vcpu() stub to the #else part of the ifdef in this patch. Also please don't modify patches authored by others without calling out the modifications somewhere, either the commit message or under the --- of the patch or in the cover letter. Thanks, drew
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 8:30 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 10:12:15AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > > From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > > > Add some unfortunate #ifdeffery to ensure the common get-reg-list.c > > can be compiled and run with other architectures. The next > > architecture to support get-reg-list should now only need to provide > > $(ARCH_DIR)/get-reg-list.c where arch-specific print_reg() and > > vcpu_configs[] get defined. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > index 69bb91087081..c4bd5a5259da 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) > > printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); > > } > > > > +#ifdef __aarch64__ > > static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > > { > > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > > @@ -120,6 +121,24 @@ static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > } > > } > > > > +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; > > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > > + > > + prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); > > + vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > > + aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); > > + > > + return vcpu; > > +} > > +#else > > +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) > > +{ > > + return __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > { > > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; > > @@ -139,7 +158,6 @@ static bool print_filtered; > > > > static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > { > > - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; > > int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; > > int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; > > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > > @@ -149,9 +167,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > > check_supported(c); > > > > vm = vm_create_barebones(); > > - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); > > - vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > > - aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); > > + vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm); > > finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); > > I just noticed that this has been modified from what I posted to leave > the finalize_vcpu() call here, despite it now being inside the #ifdef > __aarch64__. That breaks the purpose of the patch. Please make sure this > file compiles for other architectures without requiring additional > patches, which would keep the commit message honest. You can either > revert this to what I posted, and then readd the finalize_vcpu() call in > another patch, or you can add a finalize_vcpu() stub to the #else part > of the ifdef in this patch. > > Also please don't modify patches authored by others without calling out > the modifications somewhere, either the commit message or under the --- > of the patch or in the cover letter. > Thanks for pointing it out! I will have a check about it. > Thanks, > drew
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index 69bb91087081..c4bd5a5259da 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); } +#ifdef __aarch64__ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -120,6 +121,24 @@ static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) } } +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + + prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); + vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); + aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); + + return vcpu; +} +#else +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) +{ + return __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); +} +#endif + static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -139,7 +158,6 @@ static bool print_filtered; static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; @@ -149,9 +167,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) check_supported(c); vm = vm_create_barebones(); - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); - vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); - aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); + vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm); finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu);