From patchwork Fri Jun 23 10:40:05 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Xu, Haibo1" X-Patchwork-Id: 13290331 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3289BEB64D7 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:35:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=U1r/zqme3bQwz3/O8KkjLXpWBLzpjCpXHuyT4+kUQ2o=; b=XxarvDiVnDUgrb FsxNF6jPEgp+pWrj61x+SEXe8I7HE0jC5JXD1KFJbCuw3waB5KkbBGEnILcxgKRT5UO+GPRnbV1F4 3rHeWMaIHgeNVnW6fMtldeXj2sn6jJfBfOmNv0tXmjfWBtywwsgVfuKD4LXFVZRsibwPhAPcj1gRa gCwu4apE2dozB3CjXUT0kCICkN1VLofT5d9YI9+zqp4QmJwxS1I0VWz10J7LwC01sckaeaXfzjqM1 5CMhkJbXSzcaURkG6b8/BmjhAXz3XKQmmVLChy6YTWBOjYFKiDvhrtYVgaeLQ7FKJ7PAhXyYULKCN P13KVzeOpdvY/R1zs2Xg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qCe8K-003Hib-2N; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:35:16 +0000 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qCe8G-003He6-1d; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:35:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1687516512; x=1719052512; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=quNRDcUJypPIG/seUf6i3WDOA80CN8cLhVMRoyeshgI=; b=R9sEPK6zJUwL55gSW05hBV7RzDEIdOtHjVjhbDdn0SyLiIQWByOWbCC4 HozIf2PeOArmYeIv4b8eqla2W27cg4HWALNNtOwE2r5HDr5q4nK9+MK+E Js0QQ40Xd9rNby5VkpCRtqQq9swp7pSuC63J3r1du4J07ftJlP2kxKCZt LDz4UJJhq01FopZ6OVzmwUSPHexx2E3Cuyvb+y3F4VgnznDeQc/0SOYuz 7MddoCjjFCQTLJMkoavKMkIemyZ0SYXDoEe17l5Nvogsn/+E6f1EtclKd aIhI0mGo45SZWK30adtO+PiRMSAvqfJ7kGOzwmv5RTZLgyDViHEvCqXwa w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10749"; a="447112402" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,151,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="447112402" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2023 03:35:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10749"; a="715275904" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,151,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="715275904" Received: from haibo-optiplex-7090.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.132]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2023 03:35:04 -0700 From: Haibo Xu To: Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , David Matlack , Ben Gardon , Ricardo Koller , Vishal Annapurve , Vipin Sharma , Colton Lewis , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:40:05 +0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230623_033512_572383_31D978C3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Andrew Jones print_reg() and its helpers only use the vcpu_config pointer for config_name(). So just pass the config name in instead, which is used as a prefix in asserts. print_reg() can now be compiled independently of config_name(). Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu --- .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 52 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index 915272c342f9..424285d39965 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static bool find_reg(__u64 regs[], __u64 nr_regs, __u64 reg) #define CORE_SPSR_XX_NR_WORDS 2 #define CORE_FPREGS_XX_NR_WORDS 4 -static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) +static const char *core_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { __u64 core_off = id & ~REG_MASK, idx; @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]) ... KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]): idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0])) / CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS; - TEST_ASSERT(idx < 31, "%s: Unexpected regs.regs index: %lld", config_name(c), idx); + TEST_ASSERT(idx < 31, "%s: Unexpected regs.regs index: %lld", prefix, idx); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[%lld])", idx); case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp): return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp)"; @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0]) ... KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_NR_SPSR - 1]): idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0])) / CORE_SPSR_XX_NR_WORDS; - TEST_ASSERT(idx < KVM_NR_SPSR, "%s: Unexpected spsr index: %lld", config_name(c), idx); + TEST_ASSERT(idx < KVM_NR_SPSR, "%s: Unexpected spsr index: %lld", prefix, idx); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[%lld])", idx); case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]) ... KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]): idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0])) / CORE_FPREGS_XX_NR_WORDS; - TEST_ASSERT(idx < 32, "%s: Unexpected fp_regs.vregs index: %lld", config_name(c), idx); + TEST_ASSERT(idx < 32, "%s: Unexpected fp_regs.vregs index: %lld", prefix, idx); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[%lld])", idx); case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr): return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr)"; @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr)"; } - TEST_FAIL("%s: Unknown core reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + TEST_FAIL("%s: Unknown core reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return NULL; } -static const char *sve_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) +static const char *sve_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { __u64 sve_off, n, i; @@ -181,37 +181,37 @@ static const char *sve_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) sve_off = id & ~(REG_MASK | ((1ULL << 5) - 1)); i = id & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_MAX_SLICES - 1); - TEST_ASSERT(i == 0, "%s: Currently we don't expect slice > 0, reg id 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + TEST_ASSERT(i == 0, "%s: Currently we don't expect slice > 0, reg id 0x%llx", prefix, id); switch (sve_off) { case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG_BASE ... KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG_BASE + (1ULL << 5) * KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS - 1: n = (id >> 5) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS - 1); TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(n, 0), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE ZREG id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE ZREG id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(%lld, 0)", n); case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG_BASE ... KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG_BASE + (1ULL << 5) * KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS - 1: n = (id >> 5) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS - 1); TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(n, 0), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE PREG id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE PREG id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(%lld, 0)", n); case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR_BASE: TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE FFR id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE FFR id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return "KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0)"; } return NULL; } -static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) +static void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { unsigned op0, op1, crn, crm, op2; const char *reg_size = NULL; TEST_ASSERT((id & KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK) == KVM_REG_ARM64, - "%s: KVM_REG_ARM64 missing in reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: KVM_REG_ARM64 missing in reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) { case KVM_REG_SIZE_U8: @@ -243,16 +243,16 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) break; default: TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected reg size: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx", - config_name(c), (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT, id); + prefix, (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT, id); } switch (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) { case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE: - printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | %s,\n", reg_size, core_id_to_str(c, id)); + printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | %s,\n", reg_size, core_id_to_str(prefix, id)); break; case KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX: TEST_ASSERT(!(id & ~(REG_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_VAL_MASK)), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in DEMUX reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in DEMUX reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_CCSIDR | %lld,\n", reg_size, id & KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_VAL_MASK); break; @@ -263,25 +263,25 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) crm = (id & KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_SHIFT; op2 = (id & KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_SHIFT; TEST_ASSERT(id == ARM64_SYS_REG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SYSREG reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SYSREG reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tARM64_SYS_REG(%d, %d, %d, %d, %d),\n", op0, op1, crn, crm, op2); break; case KVM_REG_ARM_FW: TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(id & 0xffff), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in FW reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in FW reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff); break; case KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP: TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(id & 0xffff), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in the bitmap feature FW reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in the bitmap feature FW reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff); break; case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE: - printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(c, id)); + printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(prefix, id)); break; default: TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected coproc type: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx", - config_name(c), (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT, id); + prefix, (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT, id); } } @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) __u64 id = reg_list->reg[i]; if ((print_list && !filter_reg(id)) || (print_filtered && filter_reg(id))) - print_reg(c, id); + print_reg(config_name(c), id); } putchar('\n'); return; @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); if (ret) { printf("%s: Failed to get ", config_name(c)); - print_reg(c, reg.id); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n'); ++failed_get; } @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); - print_reg(c, reg.id); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n'); ++failed_reject; } @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); if (ret) { printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); - print_reg(c, reg.id); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n'); ++failed_set; } @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) "Consider adding them to the blessed reg " "list with the following lines:\n\n", config_name(c), new_regs); for_each_new_reg(i) - print_reg(c, reg_list->reg[i]); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg_list->reg[i]); putchar('\n'); } @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) printf("\n%s: There are %d missing registers.\n" "The following lines are missing registers:\n\n", config_name(c), missing_regs); for_each_missing_reg(i) - print_reg(c, blessed_reg[i]); + print_reg(config_name(c), blessed_reg[i]); putchar('\n'); }