Message ID | 20190621103258.8154-1-tony.xie@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | support a new type of PMIC, including two chips(rk817 and rk809) | expand |
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Tony Xie wrote: > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > so they can share allmost all codes. > > Their specifications are as follows: > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > registers > for these components except dcdc5. > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. Just tried to apply this set to a v5.2-rc1 base, but it doesn't seem to do so cleanly. Would you be able to rebase and resend please?
Hi Lee, Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019, 13:52:51 CEST schrieb Lee Jones: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Tony Xie wrote: > > > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > > so they can share allmost all codes. > > > > Their specifications are as follows: > > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > > registers > > for these components except dcdc5. > > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. > > Just tried to apply this set to a v5.2-rc1 base, but it doesn't seem > to do so cleanly. Would you be able to rebase and resend please? I took the liberty of rebasing patch 3 accordingly and sent it as reply to the original patch3 as (v10.1). The other patches did apply cleanly after that. Heiko