mbox series

[v3,00/10] IOMMU memory observability

Message ID 20231226200205.562565-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series IOMMU memory observability | expand

Message

Pasha Tatashin Dec. 26, 2023, 8:01 p.m. UTC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changelog
----------------------------------------------------------------------
v3:
- Sync with v6.7-rc7
- Addressed comments from David Rientjes: s/pages/page/, added unlikely() into
  the branches, expanded comment for iommu_free_pages_list().
- Added Acked-bys: David Rientjes

v2:
- Added Reviewed-by Janne Grunau
- Sync with 6.7.0-rc3, 3b47bc037bd44f142ac09848e8d3ecccc726be99
- Separated form the series patches:
vhost-vdpa: account iommu allocations
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130200447.2319543-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
vfio: account iommu allocations
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130200900.2320829-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
as suggested by Jason Gunthorpe
- Fixed SPARC build issue detected by kernel test robot
- Drop the following patches as they do account iommu page tables:
iommu/dma: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
iommu/fsl: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
iommu/iommufd: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
as suggested by Robin Murphy. These patches are not related to IOMMU
page tables. We might need to do a separate work to support DMA
observability.
- Remove support iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s as the 2nd level pages are
under a page size, thanks Robin Murphy for pointing this out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IOMMU subsystem may contain state that is in gigabytes. Majority of that
state is iommu page tables. Yet, there is currently, no way to observe
how much memory is actually used by the iommu subsystem.

This patch series solves this problem by adding both observability to
all pages that are allocated by IOMMU, and also accountability, so
admins can limit the amount if via cgroups.

The system-wide observability is using /proc/meminfo:
SecPageTables:    438176 kB

Contains IOMMU and KVM memory.

Per-node observability:
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/meminfo
Node N SecPageTables:    422204 kB

Contains IOMMU and KVM memory memory in the given NUMA node.

Per-node IOMMU only observability:
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/vmstat
nr_iommu_pages 105555

Contains number of pages IOMMU allocated in the given node.

Accountability: using sec_pagetables cgroup-v2 memory.stat entry.

With the change, iova_stress[1] stops as limit is reached:

# ./iova_stress
iova space:     0T      free memory:   497G
iova space:     1T      free memory:   495G
iova space:     2T      free memory:   493G
iova space:     3T      free memory:   491G

stops as limit is reached.

This series encorporates suggestions that came from the discussion
at LPC [2].
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] https://github.com/soleen/iova_stress
[2] https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1466
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous versions
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231128204938.1453583-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231130201504.2322355-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Pasha Tatashin (10):
  iommu/vt-d: add wrapper functions for page allocations
  iommu/amd: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
  iommu/io-pgtable-arm: use page allocation function provided by
    iommu-pages.h
  iommu/io-pgtable-dart: use page allocation function provided by
    iommu-pages.h
  iommu/exynos: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
  iommu/rockchip: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
  iommu/sun50i: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
  iommu/tegra-smmu: use page allocation function provided by
    iommu-pages.h
  iommu: observability of the IOMMU allocations
  iommu: account IOMMU allocated memory

 Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst |   2 +-
 Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst      |   4 +-
 drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu.h           |   8 -
 drivers/iommu/amd/init.c                |  91 +++++----
 drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable.c          |  13 +-
 drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable_v2.c       |  20 +-
 drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c               |  13 +-
 drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c            |  14 +-
 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c              |  10 +-
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c             |  47 ++---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h             |   2 -
 drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c     |  10 +-
 drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c             |  12 +-
 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c               |   7 +-
 drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c          |   7 +-
 drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-dart.c         |  37 ++--
 drivers/iommu/iommu-pages.h             | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c          |  14 +-
 drivers/iommu/sun50i-iommu.c            |   7 +-
 drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c              |  18 +-
 include/linux/mmzone.h                  |   5 +-
 mm/vmstat.c                             |   3 +
 22 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/iommu-pages.h

Comments

Bagas Sanjaya Dec. 27, 2023, 10:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:01:55PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Changelog
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> v3:
> - Sync with v6.7-rc7
> - Addressed comments from David Rientjes: s/pages/page/, added unlikely() into
>   the branches, expanded comment for iommu_free_pages_list().
> - Added Acked-bys: David Rientjes
> 
> v2:
> - Added Reviewed-by Janne Grunau
> - Sync with 6.7.0-rc3, 3b47bc037bd44f142ac09848e8d3ecccc726be99
> - Separated form the series patches:
> vhost-vdpa: account iommu allocations
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130200447.2319543-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> vfio: account iommu allocations
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130200900.2320829-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> as suggested by Jason Gunthorpe
> - Fixed SPARC build issue detected by kernel test robot
> - Drop the following patches as they do account iommu page tables:
> iommu/dma: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
> iommu/fsl: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
> iommu/iommufd: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
> as suggested by Robin Murphy. These patches are not related to IOMMU
> page tables. We might need to do a separate work to support DMA
> observability.
> - Remove support iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s as the 2nd level pages are
> under a page size, thanks Robin Murphy for pointing this out.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Description
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> IOMMU subsystem may contain state that is in gigabytes. Majority of that
> state is iommu page tables. Yet, there is currently, no way to observe
> how much memory is actually used by the iommu subsystem.
> 
> This patch series solves this problem by adding both observability to
> all pages that are allocated by IOMMU, and also accountability, so
> admins can limit the amount if via cgroups.
> 
> The system-wide observability is using /proc/meminfo:
> SecPageTables:    438176 kB
> 
> Contains IOMMU and KVM memory.
> 
> Per-node observability:
> /sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/meminfo
> Node N SecPageTables:    422204 kB
> 
> Contains IOMMU and KVM memory memory in the given NUMA node.
> 
> Per-node IOMMU only observability:
> /sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/vmstat
> nr_iommu_pages 105555
> 
> Contains number of pages IOMMU allocated in the given node.
> 
> Accountability: using sec_pagetables cgroup-v2 memory.stat entry.
> 
> With the change, iova_stress[1] stops as limit is reached:
> 
> # ./iova_stress
> iova space:     0T      free memory:   497G
> iova space:     1T      free memory:   495G
> iova space:     2T      free memory:   493G
> iova space:     3T      free memory:   491G
> 
> stops as limit is reached.
> 
> This series encorporates suggestions that came from the discussion
> at LPC [2].
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [1] https://github.com/soleen/iova_stress
> [2] https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1466
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Previous versions
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231128204938.1453583-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231130201504.2322355-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year for all!

And for this series, no observable regressions when booting the kernel with
the series applied.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Pasha Tatashin Dec. 28, 2023, 2:36 p.m. UTC | #2
> > This series encorporates suggestions that came from the discussion
> > at LPC [2].
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [1] https://github.com/soleen/iova_stress
> > [2] https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1466
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Previous versions
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231128204938.1453583-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231130201504.2322355-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year for all!
>
> And for this series, no observable regressions when booting the kernel with
> the series applied.
>
> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

Thank you for testing.

Pasha
Michal Koutný Jan. 4, 2024, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #3
Hello.

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:01:55PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
> This patch series solves this problem by adding both observability to
> all pages that are allocated by IOMMU, and also accountability, so
> admins can limit the amount if via cgroups.

Maybe this is a mismatch in vocabulary what you mean by the verb
"limit". But I don't see in the patchset that the offending pages would
be allocated with GFP_ACCOUNT. So the result is that the pages are
accounted (you can view the amount in memory.stat) but they are not
subject to memcg limits.

Is that what you intend?


Regards,
Michal
Pasha Tatashin Jan. 4, 2024, 4:29 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:31 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:01:55PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
> > This patch series solves this problem by adding both observability to
> > all pages that are allocated by IOMMU, and also accountability, so
> > admins can limit the amount if via cgroups.
>
> Maybe this is a mismatch in vocabulary what you mean by the verb
> "limit". But I don't see in the patchset that the offending pages would
> be allocated with GFP_ACCOUNT. So the result is that the pages are
> accounted (you can view the amount in memory.stat) but they are not
> subject to memcg limits.
>
> Is that what you intend?

Hi Michal,

Thank you for taking a look at this. The two patches [1] [2] which add
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT were sent separate from this series at request of
reviewers:

Pasha

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231226182827.294158-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231130200900.2320829-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com

>
>
> Regards,
> Michal
Michal Koutný Jan. 4, 2024, 5:04 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
> Thank you for taking a look at this. The two patches [1] [2] which add
> GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT were sent separate from this series at request of
> reviewers:

Ah, I didn't catch that.

Though, I mean the patch 02/10 calls iommu_alloc_pages() with GFP_KERNEL
(and not a passed gfp from iommu_map).
Then patch 09/10 accounts all iommu_alloc_pages() under NR_IOMMU_PAGES.

I think there is a difference between what's shown NR_IOMMU_PAGES and
what will have __GFP_ACCOUNT because of that.

I.e. is it the intention that this difference is not subject to
limiting?

(Note: I'm not familiar with iommu code and moreover I'm only looking at
the two patch sets, not the complete code applied. So you may correct my
reasoning.)


Thanks,
Michal
Pasha Tatashin Jan. 4, 2024, 7:12 p.m. UTC | #6
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:04 PM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for taking a look at this. The two patches [1] [2] which add
> > GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT were sent separate from this series at request of
> > reviewers:
>
> Ah, I didn't catch that.
>
> Though, I mean the patch 02/10 calls iommu_alloc_pages() with GFP_KERNEL
> (and not a passed gfp from iommu_map).
> Then patch 09/10 accounts all iommu_alloc_pages() under NR_IOMMU_PAGES.
>
> I think there is a difference between what's shown NR_IOMMU_PAGES and
> what will have __GFP_ACCOUNT because of that.
>
> I.e. is it the intention that this difference is not subject to
> limiting?

Yes, we will have a difference between GFP_ACCOUNT and what
NR_IOMMU_PAGES shows. GFP_ACCOUNT is set only where it makes sense to
charge to user processes, i.e. IOMMU Page Tables, but there more IOMMU
shared data that should not really be charged to a specific process.
The charged and uncharged data will be visible via /proc/vmstat
nr_iommu_pages field.

Pasha

>
> (Note: I'm not familiar with iommu code and moreover I'm only looking at
> the two patch sets, not the complete code applied. So you may correct my
> reasoning.)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
Michal Koutný Jan. 5, 2024, 9:02 a.m. UTC | #7
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 02:12:26PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
> Yes, we will have a difference between GFP_ACCOUNT and what
> NR_IOMMU_PAGES shows. GFP_ACCOUNT is set only where it makes sense to
> charge to user processes, i.e. IOMMU Page Tables, but there more IOMMU
> shared data that should not really be charged to a specific process.

I see. I'd suggest adding this explanation to commit 10/10 message
(perhaps with some ballpark numbers of pages). In order to have a
reference and understadning if someone decided to charge (and limit) all
in the future.

Thanks,
Michal
Pasha Tatashin Jan. 5, 2024, 3:33 p.m. UTC | #8
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:02 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 02:12:26PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
> > Yes, we will have a difference between GFP_ACCOUNT and what
> > NR_IOMMU_PAGES shows. GFP_ACCOUNT is set only where it makes sense to
> > charge to user processes, i.e. IOMMU Page Tables, but there more IOMMU
> > shared data that should not really be charged to a specific process.
>
> I see. I'd suggest adding this explanation to commit 10/10 message
> (perhaps with some ballpark numbers of pages). In order to have a
> reference and understadning if someone decided to charge (and limit) all
> in the future.

Sure, I will update the commit log in 10/10 with this info if we will have v4.

Pasha

>
> Thanks,
> Michal