| Message ID | 1442011005-4828-1-git-send-email-sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Sjoerd, Am Samstag, 12. September 2015, 00:36:44 schrieb Sjoerd Simons: > Rockchip RK3288 has 9 GPIO banks (0 to 8) add definitions for the last > two. > > Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> > --- > > include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h > b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h index 743e66a..efc57cf 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ > #define RK_GPIO3 3 > #define RK_GPIO4 4 > #define RK_GPIO6 6 > +#define RK_GPIO7 7 > +#define RK_GPIO8 8 > > #define RK_FUNC_GPIO 0 > #define RK_FUNC_1 1 I'm actually not sure about these. In retrospect the RK_GPIOx -> x defines do not provide any additional value compared to just having the actual value in the pinctrl-nodes, so we phased them out largely for the rk3288 boards. While looking through some boards, I saw that some slipped in for stuff that gets copy'n'paste treatment most of the time, but generally we're only using the real numbers on boards - and I'd like to keep it that way and phase out the RK_GPIOx constants in new boards. Heiko
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h index 743e66a..efc57cf 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ #define RK_GPIO3 3 #define RK_GPIO4 4 #define RK_GPIO6 6 +#define RK_GPIO7 7 +#define RK_GPIO8 8 #define RK_FUNC_GPIO 0 #define RK_FUNC_1 1
Rockchip RK3288 has 9 GPIO banks (0 to 8) add definitions for the last two. Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> --- include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)