From patchwork Sat Oct 24 10:46:00 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: zhengxing X-Patchwork-Id: 7480091 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-rockchip@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18F99F731 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B4B208E8 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9C3208C8 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZpwLV-0002TT-Bm; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:46:45 +0000 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.134]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZpwLK-0002RC-Vv; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:46:36 +0000 Received: from zhengxing?rock-chips.com (unknown [192.168.167.110]) by regular1.263xmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A32CE73F0; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:46:03 +0800 (CST) X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F75E2D04D; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:45:57 +0800 (CST) X-RL-SENDER: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: heiko@sntech.de X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-SENDER: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [58.22.7.114]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) whith ESMTP id 24625P748JR; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:45:58 +0800 (CST) From: Xing Zheng To: heiko@sntech.de Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] ARM: rockchip: add support smp for rk3036 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:46:00 +0800 Message-Id: <1445683560-21829-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1445682629-21632-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> References: <1445682629-21632-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20151024_034636_031355_157E6092 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.33 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Xing Zheng , pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, galak@codeaurora.org, olof@lixom.net, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Heiko Stuebner The dual-core Cortex A7 rk3036 is a bit special in that it does not allow to control the actual powerdomain of the cpu cores, while the rest of the smp-bringup like reset control and entry address handling stays the same. Its bigger sibling, the quad-core rk3128 again allows powerdomain control. So allow that case by introducing a separate smp-enable-method, that simply disables powerdomain handling in the common code. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner Tested-by: Xing Zheng Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng --- Changes in v4: None Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 + arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index 91e6e5c..261cc27 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. "qcom,gcc-msm8660" "qcom,kpss-acc-v1" "qcom,kpss-acc-v2" + "rockchip,rk3036-smp" "rockchip,rk3066-smp" "ste,dbx500-smp" diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c index 3e7a4b7..5c138f9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int ncores; #define PMU_PWRDN_SCU 4 static struct regmap *pmu; +static int has_pmu = true; static int pmu_power_domain_is_on(int pd) { @@ -89,20 +90,23 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on) if (!IS_ERR(rstc) && !on) reset_control_assert(rstc); - ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n", __func__); - return ret; - } - - ret = -1; - while (ret != on) { - ret = pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd); + if (has_pmu) { + ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val); if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: could not read power domain state\n", + pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n", __func__); return ret; } + + ret = -1; + while (ret != on) { + ret = pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("%s: could not read power domain state\n", + __func__); + return ret; + } + } } if (!IS_ERR(rstc)) { @@ -122,7 +126,7 @@ static int rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) { int ret; - if (!sram_base_addr || !pmu) { + if (!sram_base_addr || (has_pmu && !pmu)) { pr_err("%s: sram or pmu missing for cpu boot\n", __func__); return -ENXIO; } @@ -275,7 +279,7 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) return; } - if (rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu()) + if (has_pmu && rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu()) return; if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) { @@ -318,6 +322,13 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) pmu_set_power_domain(0 + i, false); } +static void __init rk3036_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) +{ + has_pmu = false; + + rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU static int rockchip_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) { @@ -340,6 +351,15 @@ static void rockchip_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) } #endif +static struct smp_operations rk3036_smp_ops __initdata = { + .smp_prepare_cpus = rk3036_smp_prepare_cpus, + .smp_boot_secondary = rockchip_boot_secondary, +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU + .cpu_kill = rockchip_cpu_kill, + .cpu_die = rockchip_cpu_die, +#endif +}; + static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = { .smp_prepare_cpus = rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus, .smp_boot_secondary = rockchip_boot_secondary, @@ -349,4 +369,5 @@ static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = { #endif }; +CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3036_smp, "rockchip,rk3036-smp", &rk3036_smp_ops); CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip_smp_ops);