From patchwork Wed Nov 4 12:25:16 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: zhengxing X-Patchwork-Id: 7549521 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-rockchip@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167F29F327 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A74920534 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E8D203E1 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ztx8m-0004Pi-0v; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:26:12 +0000 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.140]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ztx8Q-0003jn-TM; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:25:55 +0000 Received: from zhengxing?rock-chips.com (unknown [192.168.167.236]) by regular1.263xmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A16EF4A7A; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:25:21 +0800 (CST) X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483C744D; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:25:22 +0800 (CST) X-RL-SENDER: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: heiko@sntech.de X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-SENDER: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [58.22.7.114]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) whith ESMTP id 31890VQEZYC; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 20:25:23 +0800 (CST) From: Xing Zheng To: heiko@sntech.de Subject: [PATCH v6 6/8] ARM: rockchip: add support smp for rk3036 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:25:16 +0800 Message-Id: <1446639916-11957-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1446639503-11763-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> References: <1446639503-11763-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20151104_042555_191827_BACDD300 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.45 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Xing Zheng , pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, galak@codeaurora.org, olof@lixom.net, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Heiko Stuebner The dual-core Cortex A7 rk3036 is a bit special in that it does not allow to control the actual powerdomain of the cpu cores, while the rest of the smp-bringup like reset control and entry address handling stays the same. Its bigger sibling, the quad-core rk3128 again allows powerdomain control. So allow that case by introducing a separate smp-enable-method, that simply disables powerdomain handling in the common code. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner Tested-by: Xing Zheng Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng Acked-by: Rob Herring --- Changes in v6: None Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 + arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index 3a07a87..8fb0749 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. "qcom,gcc-msm8660" "qcom,kpss-acc-v1" "qcom,kpss-acc-v2" + "rockchip,rk3036-smp" "rockchip,rk3066-smp" "ste,dbx500-smp" diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c index 3e7a4b7..5c138f9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int ncores; #define PMU_PWRDN_SCU 4 static struct regmap *pmu; +static int has_pmu = true; static int pmu_power_domain_is_on(int pd) { @@ -89,20 +90,23 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on) if (!IS_ERR(rstc) && !on) reset_control_assert(rstc); - ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n", __func__); - return ret; - } - - ret = -1; - while (ret != on) { - ret = pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd); + if (has_pmu) { + ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val); if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: could not read power domain state\n", + pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n", __func__); return ret; } + + ret = -1; + while (ret != on) { + ret = pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("%s: could not read power domain state\n", + __func__); + return ret; + } + } } if (!IS_ERR(rstc)) { @@ -122,7 +126,7 @@ static int rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) { int ret; - if (!sram_base_addr || !pmu) { + if (!sram_base_addr || (has_pmu && !pmu)) { pr_err("%s: sram or pmu missing for cpu boot\n", __func__); return -ENXIO; } @@ -275,7 +279,7 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) return; } - if (rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu()) + if (has_pmu && rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu()) return; if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) { @@ -318,6 +322,13 @@ static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) pmu_set_power_domain(0 + i, false); } +static void __init rk3036_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) +{ + has_pmu = false; + + rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU static int rockchip_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) { @@ -340,6 +351,15 @@ static void rockchip_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) } #endif +static struct smp_operations rk3036_smp_ops __initdata = { + .smp_prepare_cpus = rk3036_smp_prepare_cpus, + .smp_boot_secondary = rockchip_boot_secondary, +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU + .cpu_kill = rockchip_cpu_kill, + .cpu_die = rockchip_cpu_die, +#endif +}; + static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = { .smp_prepare_cpus = rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus, .smp_boot_secondary = rockchip_boot_secondary, @@ -349,4 +369,5 @@ static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = { #endif }; +CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3036_smp, "rockchip,rk3036-smp", &rk3036_smp_ops); CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip_smp_ops);