From patchwork Mon Dec 30 08:28:14 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jagan Teki X-Patchwork-Id: 11312717 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F4D930 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 010C420748 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="W+3FR45/"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=amarulasolutions.com header.i=@amarulasolutions.com header.b="MlZE2DM0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 010C420748 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amarulasolutions.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lMGF8mBkBMYchI00YGwHS4i9XqdpkXBqKlbpRwgpyCQ=; b=W+3FR45/+niKH/ azDoAOAS+g3E2zQlO8jdYRTdu93qs357+5LRXuRKT+Jf0yRNFyh7gxPMyi4AGmD8M9QP/pdiZ4F2x EEvWOI5bhBOBRmvTnt9chWvKesXKe2isQPJIJju/fU9lM7UQYe9rtjImIhkK+ft35O2S5VV5J4g5L SSHEU5WeB7VmepPIXHkXsfzo0bXoBYD+1/hFXvTHLgifcxEPZwIyTIykp5XAYj5eb0x9ViqldnJ+Y 6jR3i7ydAtOhfQxae0V/cJ2qXSiTrX5iNstFtX3sKA+4Yfg2Vs+UC66grgNN0hA1q29JQTji/y3e+ VLqcovdV6M0DLPECmEMQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ilqPo-0006Mf-4Z; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:28:40 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x641.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::641]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ilqPj-0006KK-0h for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:28:37 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x641.google.com with SMTP id y8so14337844pll.13 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:28:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amarulasolutions.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MdVD38WP8mrB9cxL9ngtMTtlvhd/lrRFS5qqLyy/3UM=; b=MlZE2DM0wOsol+YoYqPuhAkBrVnIBVE+xAL9bgj8s43TrIDVak7oMVANwNBafAwr/8 7AvwSfBjf2UQCuY9qb5frM0fg2FV/DI7zyGu9qe9q0xlc5snHQfMgW/afHqksx4B/XB3 hnW3nTneAHvh90yyYwa31PlzFBx7VkJjVjFHo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MdVD38WP8mrB9cxL9ngtMTtlvhd/lrRFS5qqLyy/3UM=; b=OWwiGMxOmfHpCt1jBw+qUlg00RYvIjpfU3qLC5++tKGktRYy30SfPMZsksTzhJpXLG JcLOlg3u82Si5xO3/JjA29nc0ZAHgcptpDl95I3aYIlnXiu88vNiGwY0AO6qpoAvTPR+ y+JuLJ6iBeCB7DwmD/zmHbH8SJMwR8iH7RlIOQFQ9lV5GkHyZomMfHxvsIceBDo5EffG A1Rmoq6igyAHsyTkxbAzJTqtva4uRVeF/pEnhk27akotsfMK4WLDH4G0IBM6XqepHFJb Kt+qLRWKlND8YYPsvRWuC3XRwm/ccwJtsecxpNetocS+zdU9+//4O5ySennNyjVtSJX4 js7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWtPVYsN0Bmt+prxtfKP06MM2UTyVDcgLMncD1NwPuIBRrCoa+I 7vFPR9xfi+bxeoQtSDKjg2qsJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBsaFR/18vva8NG8DE0nNHDhMQUBZ8yU153dDt1ssUVLHJ1i6qWpyvprYG4dHz449LtvHx1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8a98:: with SMTP id x24mr46130229pjn.113.1577694514556; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([49.206.202.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm46240652pgv.87.2019.12.30.00.28.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:28:33 -0800 (PST) From: Jagan Teki To: Kever Yang , Simon Glass , Philipp Tomsich Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] Makefile: rockchip: Suffix platform type with tpl name Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 13:58:14 +0530 Message-Id: <20191230082819.30191-3-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0.321.gffc6fa0e3 In-Reply-To: <20191230082819.30191-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> References: <20191230082819.30191-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191230_002835_110892_DFBCA602 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.04 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:641 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jagan Teki , u-boot@lists.denx.de, linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com, Akash Gajjar , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Most of the platforms uses the platform type on their boot stage image naming conventions in makefile like, u-boot-x86-start16-tpl.bin - x86 start16 TPL bin u-boot-spl-mtk.bin - Mediatek SPL bin This would help to understand the users to what that particular image belongs to? and less confused. On that note, suffix platform type rockchip for existing u-boot-tpl.img so now it become u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin Also, bin is more conventional way to include it on tools like binman, pad_cat etc in future patches. Note: usage of platform type doesn't follow consistent order as of now. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki Reviewed-by: Kever Yang --- Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 9998d238f3..e519103be4 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1382,10 +1382,10 @@ else ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE := rksd endif -MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-tpl.img = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE) -tpl/u-boot-tpl.img: tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin FORCE +MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE) +tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin: tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin FORCE $(call if_changed,mkimage) -idbloader.img: tpl/u-boot-tpl.img spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE +idbloader.img: tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE $(call if_changed,cat) endif