| Message ID | 20211220110630.3521121-21-s.hauer@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/rockchip: RK356x VOP2 support | expand |
Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2021, 12:06:28 CET schrieb Sascha Hauer: > Add a device node to drm_encoder which corresponds with the port node > in the DT description of the encoder. This allows drivers to find the > of_graph link between a crtc and an encoder. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > --- > include/drm/drm_encoder.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_encoder.h b/include/drm/drm_encoder.h > index 6e91a0280f31b..3acd054b1eb3e 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_encoder.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_encoder.h > @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ struct drm_encoder { > struct drm_device *dev; > struct list_head head; > > + struct device_node *port; > + > struct drm_mode_object base; > char *name; > /** > Is this the port that gets used in patch 3/22? It looks like it. So this would break bisectability. Can we order patches sequentially so that git bisect keeps working. Thanks Heiko
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_encoder.h b/include/drm/drm_encoder.h index 6e91a0280f31b..3acd054b1eb3e 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_encoder.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_encoder.h @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ struct drm_encoder { struct drm_device *dev; struct list_head head; + struct device_node *port; + struct drm_mode_object base; char *name; /**
Add a device node to drm_encoder which corresponds with the port node in the DT description of the encoder. This allows drivers to find the of_graph link between a crtc and an encoder. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> --- include/drm/drm_encoder.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)