| Message ID | 20220920103108.23074-18-jay.xu@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Rockchip pinctrl/GPIO support ACPI | expand |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:31 PM Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > Print the device probe message with the fwnode instead of of_node. > > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > index 11586d93549b..d08435619f12 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int rockchip_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank); > - dev_info(dev, "probed %pOF\n", np); > + dev_info(dev, "probed %pfw\n", dev_fwnode(dev)); > > return 0; > err_put_clk: > -- > 2.25.1 > I would instead just drop this log message. If the user wants to, they can obtain that information from the device core logs. Bart
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c index 11586d93549b..d08435619f12 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int rockchip_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank); - dev_info(dev, "probed %pOF\n", np); + dev_info(dev, "probed %pfw\n", dev_fwnode(dev)); return 0; err_put_clk:
Print the device probe message with the fwnode instead of of_node. Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)