| Message ID | 20231205-rkisp-irq-fix-v1-2-f4045c74ba45@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | media: rkisp1: Fix IRQ related issues | expand |
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:10 AM Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > The IRQ handler rkisp1_isr() calls sub-handlers, all of which returns an > irqreturn_t value, but rkisp1_isr() ignores those values and always > returns IRQ_HANDLED. > > Fix this by collecting the return values, and returning IRQ_HANDLED or > IRQ_NONE as appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> > --- > drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > index 76f93614b4cf..1d60f4b8bd09 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > @@ -445,17 +445,27 @@ static int rkisp1_entities_register(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1) > > static irqreturn_t rkisp1_isr(int irq, void *ctx) > { > + irqreturn_t ret; > + > /* > * Call rkisp1_capture_isr() first to handle the frame that > * potentially completed using the current frame_sequence number before > * it is potentially incremented by rkisp1_isp_isr() in the vertical > * sync. > */ > - rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx); > - rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx); > - rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx); > > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + ret = IRQ_NONE; > + > + if (rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + > + if (rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + > + if (rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + It seems like we're throwing away the value of ret each time the subsequent if statement is evaluated. Whether or not they return didn't matter before, and the only one that seems using the return code is the last one. Wouldn't it be simpler to use ret = rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx), ret = rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) and ret = rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) if we care about the return code? How do you expect this to return if one of the first two don't return IRQ_HANDLED? adam > + return ret; > } > > static const char * const px30_isp_clks[] = { > > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 05/12/2023 13:57, Adam Ford wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:10 AM Tomi Valkeinen > <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> >> The IRQ handler rkisp1_isr() calls sub-handlers, all of which returns an >> irqreturn_t value, but rkisp1_isr() ignores those values and always >> returns IRQ_HANDLED. >> >> Fix this by collecting the return values, and returning IRQ_HANDLED or >> IRQ_NONE as appropriate. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> >> --- >> drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c >> index 76f93614b4cf..1d60f4b8bd09 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c >> @@ -445,17 +445,27 @@ static int rkisp1_entities_register(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1) >> >> static irqreturn_t rkisp1_isr(int irq, void *ctx) >> { >> + irqreturn_t ret; >> + >> /* >> * Call rkisp1_capture_isr() first to handle the frame that >> * potentially completed using the current frame_sequence number before >> * it is potentially incremented by rkisp1_isp_isr() in the vertical >> * sync. >> */ >> - rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx); >> - rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx); >> - rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx); >> >> - return IRQ_HANDLED; >> + ret = IRQ_NONE; >> + >> + if (rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) >> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> + >> + if (rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) >> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> + >> + if (rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) >> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> + > > It seems like we're throwing away the value of ret each time the > subsequent if statement is evaluated. Whether or not they return > didn't matter before, and the only one that seems using the return > code is the last one. > > Wouldn't it be simpler to use ret = rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx), ret > = rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) and ret = rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) if we > care about the return code? > > How do you expect this to return if one of the first two don't return > IRQ_HANDLED? I'm sorry, I don't quite follow what you mean. Can you elaborate a bit? We want the rkisp1_isr() to return IRQ_NONE if none of the sub-handlers handled the interrupt. Otherwise, if any of the sub-handlers return IRQ_HANDLED, rkisp1_isr() returns IRQ_HANDLED. Tomi
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:09:33AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > The IRQ handler rkisp1_isr() calls sub-handlers, all of which returns an > irqreturn_t value, but rkisp1_isr() ignores those values and always > returns IRQ_HANDLED. > > Fix this by collecting the return values, and returning IRQ_HANDLED or > IRQ_NONE as appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> > --- > drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > index 76f93614b4cf..1d60f4b8bd09 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > @@ -445,17 +445,27 @@ static int rkisp1_entities_register(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1) > > static irqreturn_t rkisp1_isr(int irq, void *ctx) > { > + irqreturn_t ret; irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; > + > /* > * Call rkisp1_capture_isr() first to handle the frame that > * potentially completed using the current frame_sequence number before > * it is potentially incremented by rkisp1_isp_isr() in the vertical > * sync. > */ > - rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx); > - rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx); > - rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx); > > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + ret = IRQ_NONE; And drop this. Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > + > + if (rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + > + if (rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + > + if (rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + > + return ret; > } > > static const char * const px30_isp_clks[] = {
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 6:02 AM Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > On 05/12/2023 13:57, Adam Ford wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:10 AM Tomi Valkeinen > > <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > >> > >> The IRQ handler rkisp1_isr() calls sub-handlers, all of which returns an > >> irqreturn_t value, but rkisp1_isr() ignores those values and always > >> returns IRQ_HANDLED. > >> > >> Fix this by collecting the return values, and returning IRQ_HANDLED or > >> IRQ_NONE as appropriate. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > >> index 76f93614b4cf..1d60f4b8bd09 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c > >> @@ -445,17 +445,27 @@ static int rkisp1_entities_register(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1) > >> > >> static irqreturn_t rkisp1_isr(int irq, void *ctx) > >> { > >> + irqreturn_t ret; > >> + > >> /* > >> * Call rkisp1_capture_isr() first to handle the frame that > >> * potentially completed using the current frame_sequence number before > >> * it is potentially incremented by rkisp1_isp_isr() in the vertical > >> * sync. > >> */ > >> - rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx); > >> - rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx); > >> - rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx); > >> > >> - return IRQ_HANDLED; > >> + ret = IRQ_NONE; > >> + > >> + if (rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > >> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > >> + > >> + if (rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > >> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > >> + > >> + if (rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) > >> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > >> + > > > > It seems like we're throwing away the value of ret each time the > > subsequent if statement is evaluated. Whether or not they return > > didn't matter before, and the only one that seems using the return > > code is the last one. > > > > Wouldn't it be simpler to use ret = rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx), ret > > = rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) and ret = rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) if we > > care about the return code? > > > > How do you expect this to return if one of the first two don't return > > IRQ_HANDLED? > > I'm sorry, I don't quite follow what you mean. Can you elaborate a bit? > > We want the rkisp1_isr() to return IRQ_NONE if none of the sub-handlers > handled the interrupt. Otherwise, if any of the sub-handlers return > IRQ_HANDLED, rkisp1_isr() returns IRQ_HANDLED. OK. I understand your explanation. I retract my comment. I'll try to test this series tonight on my imx8mp adam > > Tomi >
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c index 76f93614b4cf..1d60f4b8bd09 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c @@ -445,17 +445,27 @@ static int rkisp1_entities_register(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1) static irqreturn_t rkisp1_isr(int irq, void *ctx) { + irqreturn_t ret; + /* * Call rkisp1_capture_isr() first to handle the frame that * potentially completed using the current frame_sequence number before * it is potentially incremented by rkisp1_isp_isr() in the vertical * sync. */ - rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx); - rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx); - rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx); - return IRQ_HANDLED; + ret = IRQ_NONE; + + if (rkisp1_capture_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; + + if (rkisp1_isp_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; + + if (rkisp1_csi_isr(irq, ctx) == IRQ_HANDLED) + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; + + return ret; } static const char * const px30_isp_clks[] = {
The IRQ handler rkisp1_isr() calls sub-handlers, all of which returns an irqreturn_t value, but rkisp1_isr() ignores those values and always returns IRQ_HANDLED. Fix this by collecting the return values, and returning IRQ_HANDLED or IRQ_NONE as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> --- drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)