| Message ID | 20240216094922.257674-2-shreeya.patel@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX Controller | expand |
On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: > Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. > > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> > --- > drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + > include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch with errors to the mailing list? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: > > Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> > > --- > > drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + > > include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ > > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some > warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. > Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. > > Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: > YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch > with errors to the mailing list? > I am sorry but what errors are you talking about? I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :- shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review. I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me. > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > _______________________________________________ > Kernel mailing list -- kernel@mailman.collabora.com > To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@mailman.collabora.com > This list is managed by https://mailman.collabora.com
Le vendredi 16 février 2024 à 11:03 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit : > On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: > > Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> > > --- > > drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + > > include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ > > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some > warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. > Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. > > Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: > YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch > with errors to the mailing list? Mistakes helps you learn. Meanwhile, I've triggered our temporary CI which hopefully will catch this and some more for a better v2. Shreeya, I don't think this includes any DT automated checks, this is on you. https://gitlab.collabora.com/linux/build-scripts/-/pipelines/85935 > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > >
On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote: > On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: >>> Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + >>> include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ >> >> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some >> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. >> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. >> >> Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: >> YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch >> with errors to the mailing list? >> > > I am sorry but what errors are you talking about? > I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :- > > shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch > WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst Here. > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review. > > I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me. Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Saturday, February 17, 2024 13:47 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote: > > On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: > >>> Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + > >>> include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ > >> > >> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some > >> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. > >> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. > >> > >> Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: > >> YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch > >> with errors to the mailing list? > >> > > > > I am sorry but what errors are you talking about? > > I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :- > > > > shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch > > WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst > > Here. > > > > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked > > > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > > > hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review. > > > > I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me. > > Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not? > OK, now I see what you meant. Since we are touching the include file and C file together, this warning was generated. It was a bit confusing to interpret this as the warning also talks about Documentation which we didn't touch at all. Anyway, I will create two separate patches for this in v2. Thanks, Shreeya Patel > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 17/02/2024 11:18, Shreeya Patel wrote: > On Saturday, February 17, 2024 13:47 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote: >>> On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: >>>>> Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + >>>>> include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ >>>> >>>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some >>>> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. >>>> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. >>>> >>>> Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: >>>> YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch >>>> with errors to the mailing list? >>>> >>> >>> I am sorry but what errors are you talking about? >>> I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :- >>> >>> shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch >>> WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst >> >> Here. >> >>> >>> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked >>> >>> NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to >>> mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. >>> >>> hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review. >>> >>> I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me. >> >> Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not? >> > > OK, now I see what you meant. Since we are touching the include file and C file together, this warning was generated. > It was a bit confusing to interpret this as the warning also talks about Documentation which we didn't touch at all. Really, no documentation touching? Care to check the full path of the files you are changing? > > Anyway, I will create two separate patches for this in v2. I think rules cannot be clearer: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc4/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L13 Best regards, Krzysztof
On Saturday, February 17, 2024 15:50 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > On 17/02/2024 11:18, Shreeya Patel wrote: > > On Saturday, February 17, 2024 13:47 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote: > >>> On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: > >>>>> Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + > >>>>> include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ > >>>> > >>>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some > >>>> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. > >>>> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. > >>>> > >>>> Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: > >>>> YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch > >>>> with errors to the mailing list? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I am sorry but what errors are you talking about? > >>> I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :- > >>> > >>> shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch > >>> WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst > >> > >> Here. > >> > >>> > >>> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked > >>> > >>> NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > >>> mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > >>> > >>> hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review. > >>> > >>> I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me. > >> > >> Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not? > >> > > > > OK, now I see what you meant. Since we are touching the include file and C file together, this warning was generated. > > It was a bit confusing to interpret this as the warning also talks about Documentation which we didn't touch at all. > > Really, no documentation touching? Care to check the full path of the > files you are changing? > Well, I meant the dt-binding doc for rst-rk3588 > > > > > Anyway, I will create two separate patches for this in v2. > > I think rules cannot be clearer: > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc4/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L13 > right, it was my mistake and I think after this nice and kind feedback, I'll never make the same one again :) Thanks, Shreeya Patel > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > _______________________________________________ > Kernel mailing list -- kernel@mailman.collabora.com > To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@mailman.collabora.com > This list is managed by https://mailman.collabora.com
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c index e855bb8d5413..c4ebc01f1c9c 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c @@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ static const int rk3588_register_offset[] = { /* SOFTRST_CON59 */ RK3588_CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_HDCP1_BIU, 59, 6), + RK3588_CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_HDMIRX_BIU, 59, 7), RK3588_CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_VO1_BIU, 59, 8), RK3588_CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_VOP1_BIU, 59, 9), RK3588_CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_VOP1_S_BIU, 59, 10), diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h index d4264db2a07f..e2fe4bd5f7f0 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h @@ -751,4 +751,6 @@ #define SRST_P_TRNG_CHK 658 #define SRST_TRNG_S 659 +#define SRST_A_HDMIRX_BIU 660 + #endif
Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com> --- drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)