diff mbox series

[v2,09/12] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add rockchip,rk3576-wdt compatible

Message ID 20240823150057.56141-10-detlev.casanova@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add device tree for ArmSoM Sige 5 board | expand

Commit Message

Detlev Casanova Aug. 23, 2024, 2:52 p.m. UTC
It is compatible with the other rockchip SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 24, 2024, 7:52 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> It is compatible with the other rockchip SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Guenter Roeck Aug. 24, 2024, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> It is compatible with the other rockchip SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>

Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
> index c7aab0418a320..b5a3dc3770706 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties:
>                - rockchip,rk3368-wdt
>                - rockchip,rk3399-wdt
>                - rockchip,rk3568-wdt
> +              - rockchip,rk3576-wdt
>                - rockchip,rk3588-wdt
>                - rockchip,rv1108-wdt
>            - const: snps,dw-wdt
> -- 
> 2.46.0
>
Heiko Stuebner Aug. 27, 2024, 7:20 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Guenter,

Am Samstag, 24. August 2024, 18:44:29 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > It is compatible with the other rockchip SoCs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

For my understanding, does this Ack mean you expect the patch to go in
with the other patches?

Because in theory this patch could also be picked and go through the
watchdog tree, similar to how the saradc binding went into the
iio tree already.

Thanks
Heiko
Guenter Roeck Aug. 27, 2024, 7:38 p.m. UTC | #4
On 8/27/24 00:20, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> Am Samstag, 24. August 2024, 18:44:29 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
>>> It is compatible with the other rockchip SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> 
> For my understanding, does this Ack mean you expect the patch to go in
> with the other patches?
> 
Yes

> Because in theory this patch could also be picked and go through the
> watchdog tree, similar to how the saradc binding went into the
> iio tree already.
> 

I thought it was all supposed to be pushed together.

Guenter
Heiko Stuebner Aug. 29, 2024, 11:52 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Guenter,

Am Dienstag, 27. August 2024, 21:38:35 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 8/27/24 00:20, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 24. August 2024, 18:44:29 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> >>> It is compatible with the other rockchip SoCs.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > 
> > For my understanding, does this Ack mean you expect the patch to go in
> > with the other patches?
> > 
> Yes
> 
> > Because in theory this patch could also be picked and go through the
> > watchdog tree, similar to how the saradc binding went into the
> > iio tree already.
> > 
> 
> I thought it was all supposed to be pushed together.

I think at this point the rk3576 has still quite a number of separate
pieces. A series for clocks, one for mmc and I think there are more.

So for stuff that is obvious, like the saradc compatible Jonathan already,
picked or this watchdog compatible, a strategy of "someone picks the
individual" patch also is helpful, because it reduces the number of pieces
on the "chess board" ;-) .


So I guess both ways (wdt binding getting applied, or me just applying it
with the rest) are doable and we'll just follow what you feel comfortable
with doing.

Heiko
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
index c7aab0418a320..b5a3dc3770706 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@  properties:
               - rockchip,rk3368-wdt
               - rockchip,rk3399-wdt
               - rockchip,rk3568-wdt
+              - rockchip,rk3576-wdt
               - rockchip,rk3588-wdt
               - rockchip,rv1108-wdt
           - const: snps,dw-wdt