From patchwork Sun Sep 8 14:54:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonas Karlman X-Patchwork-Id: 13795538 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCCCE6FE49 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2024 14:57:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=YT2phNxagi7J6y0Le0rbYmp1Tc8d3aImlJHuCWlZmTs=; b=eUA5Yp2z6TL5Yz jZrxxwuFatp8eHMcGjcT3vIn8qNxBh3r3KRbn8YCNRoizoCJr81+3Wt+82QezpprGqqrqHy3lRX0A HnON9BF3GgL0/SN58zWhqIKNyrFLtM3IL65b/83lw+QxYdoFCPjcmlDIyh5C6cYdji7mv9Xa/3Cf0 NJHrMld43XGcJdm9nfegXuH2DAOMXvBqosWj5m2vwxFpfdFsnU7uuIGJrpMdPXFM8rGz5khanti5B JsdNnVNPbetstK7oRCxZ1pAfGCWvS9neFu8SrKvbrn8I99vCL31QhDuhDsvUdk3f8JlNleyZWYqxH prRxM6z7jd7HxmXzVplQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1snJMO-0000000Gzjo-2k73; Sun, 08 Sep 2024 14:57:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.forwardemail.net ([149.28.215.223]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1snJKR-0000000Gz65-1FZI for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2024 14:55:53 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kwiboo.se; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version: References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Date: Subject: Cc: To: From; q=dns/txt; s=fe-e1b5cab7be; t=1725807332; bh=s4d/+ThRHSQtfU43RCtR36kOGQZWrroV7EpFOhfrkPA=; b=dDz0Rd+ysMJo7E7Mp/8ntt1o7OUMS97maozuVK800alL0C7nalo7oYo02BiBtmFvibztL0h6V 0esFL6jjvePN3SxQgMjohPvX5NV3d38QJK9IDb1i5UFay1F7LoC6+x+V1BETArYs4QwFf6nyIWD jI7G/S2TDMp46puwgyQdgt5YoEOQDJrvVGLifkIOXsbFcZGwwCGSVfzd6FaB18cA/uvmNM/uf44 A2xHypv3Vitpof6yldLNUz4pzBxitCaky3kOcq1x1LTHKyKf0UTnaAZcC483yTgP26gUqcAFV0Q nGJsENbQ/8W/7x4XwcR24/2fHGDKD8sfEHsUqXIkyv9Q== From: Jonas Karlman To: Heiko Stuebner , Sandy Huang , Andy Yan , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter Cc: Diederik de Haas , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Karlman , Yakir Yang Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: Adjust cklvl & txlvl for RF/EMI Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 14:54:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20240908145511.3331451-3-jonas@kwiboo.se> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20240908145511.3331451-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> References: <20240908145511.3331451-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@forwardemail.net X-Report-Abuse: abuse@forwardemail.net X-Complaints-To: abuse@forwardemail.net X-ForwardEmail-Version: 0.4.40 X-ForwardEmail-Sender: rfc822; jonas@kwiboo.se, smtp.forwardemail.net, 149.28.215.223 X-ForwardEmail-ID: 66ddbadf3c9877b459588e98 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240908_075551_413396_53216B92 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Yakir Yang Dut to the high HDMI signal voltage driver, Mickey have meet a serious RF/EMI problem, so we decided to reduce HDMI signal voltage to a proper value. The default params for phy is cklvl = 20 & txlvl = 13 (RF/EMI failed) ck: lvl = 13, term=100, vlo = 2.71, vhi=3.14, vswing = 0.43 tx: lvl = 20, term=100, vlo = 2.81, vhi=3.16, vswing = 0.35 1. We decided to reduce voltage value to lower, but VSwing still keep high, RF/EMI have been improved but still failed. ck: lvl = 6, term=100, vlo = 2.61, vhi=3.11, vswing = 0.50 tx: lvl = 6, term=100, vlo = 2.61, vhi=3.11, vswing = 0.50 2. We try to keep voltage value and vswing both lower, then RF/EMI test all passed ;) ck: lvl = 11, term= 66, vlo = 2.68, vhi=3.09, vswing = 0.40 tx: lvl = 11, term= 66, vlo = 2.68, vhi=3.09, vswing = 0.40 When we back to run HDMI different test and single-end test, we see different test passed, but signle-end test failed. The oscilloscope show that simgle-end clock's VL value is 1.78v (which remind LowLimit should not lower then 2.6v). 3. That's to say there are some different between PHY document and measure value. And according to experiment 2 results, we need to higher clock voltage and lower data voltage, then we can keep RF/EMI satisfied and single-end & differen test passed. ck: lvl = 9, term=100, vlo = 2.65, vhi=3.12, vswing = 0.47 tx: lvl = 16, term=100, vlo = 2.75, vhi=3.15, vswing = 0.39 Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman --- v2: No change --- drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c index 36cc700766fd..fc5e87285a91 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static const struct dw_hdmi_curr_ctrl rockchip_cur_ctr[] = { static const struct dw_hdmi_phy_config rockchip_phy_config[] = { /*pixelclk symbol term vlev*/ { 74250000, 0x8009, 0x0004, 0x0272}, - { 148500000, 0x802b, 0x0004, 0x028d}, + { 165000000, 0x802b, 0x0004, 0x0209}, { 297000000, 0x8039, 0x0005, 0x028d}, { ~0UL, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000} };