From patchwork Mon Jun 29 12:35:13 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= X-Patchwork-Id: 6688691 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-rockchip@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C4D9F3D1 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3432047D for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2700E2047C for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Z9YIW-0000FJ-8R; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:36:28 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Z9YHk-00084B-SI; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:35:41 +0000 Received: from [95.91.187.196] (helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9YHK-00079y-BG; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:35:14 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: document rk3368 R88 board from Rockchip Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: <7253030.KcEv5ApOSe@diego> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3333434.ZKWQ6GxgtB@diego> References: <3333434.ZKWQ6GxgtB@diego> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20150629_053541_141841_D3A6AF76 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.01 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Kumar Gala X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The initial board containing the rk3368 ARM64 soc. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- This should probably be simply in one branch with the Netxeon board seen in the diff above, to prevent unncessary merge conflicts? Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt index b30bed1..c4119e0 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt @@ -30,3 +30,7 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings - Netxeon R89 board: Required root node properties: - compatible = "netxeon,r89", "rockchip,rk3288"; + +- Rockchip R88 board: + Required root node properties: + - compatible = "rockchip,r88", "rockchip,rk3368";