b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -279,25 +279,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_cpufreq_irq(int irq, void
*id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static void exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(void)
-{
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_tbl = dvfs_info->freq_table;
- int i = 0, index;
- unsigned int tmp_freq;
- /*
- * Exynos5440 clock controller state logic expects the cpufreq table
to
- * be in descending order. But the OPP library constructs the table
in
- * ascending order. So to make the table descending we just need to
- * swap the i element with the N - i element.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < dvfs_info->freq_count / 2; i++) {
- index = dvfs_info->freq_count - i - 1;
- tmp_freq = freq_tbl[i].frequency;
- freq_tbl[i].frequency = freq_tbl[index].frequency;
- freq_tbl[index].frequency = tmp_freq;
- }
-}
-
After applying "PM / OPP: Add support for descending order for cpufreq table" ,to make the table descending we can use OPP_TABLE_ORDER_DESCEND flag. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 22 +--------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-) static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { policy->clk = dvfs_info->cpu_clk; @@ -367,14 +348,13 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(dvfs_info->dev, - &dvfs_info->freq_table); + &dvfs_info->freq_table, OPP_TABLE_ORDER_DESCEND); if (ret) { dev_err(dvfs_info->dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret); goto err_put_node; } dvfs_info->freq_count = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dvfs_info->dev); - exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(); if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &dvfs_info->latency)) dvfs_info->latency = DEF_TRANS_LATENCY;