diff mbox

[v3,2/8] clk: samsung: pll: Add support for PLL6552 and PLL6553

Message ID 11551938.yDBcNngaZN@flatron (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tomasz Figa July 23, 2013, 11:52 p.m. UTC 
This patch adds support for PLL6552 and PLL6553 PLLs present on Samsung
S3C64xx SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)

Changes since v2:
 - Reworked to use new PLL registration method introduced by Yadwinder
   Singh Brar's patch series:
   ( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20041 )

Comments

Mark Brown July 28, 2013, 12:30 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:52:19AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:

> Changes since v2:
>  - Reworked to use new PLL registration method introduced by Yadwinder
>    Singh Brar's patch series:
>    ( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20041 )

I'm not able to test this series since that lot isn't in -next and I
didn't get a copy.
Tomasz Figa July 28, 2013, 12:38 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Sunday 28 of July 2013 13:30:51 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:52:19AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Changes since v2:
> >  - Reworked to use new PLL registration method introduced by Yadwinder
> >  
> >    Singh Brar's patch series:
> >    ( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20041 )
> 
> I'm not able to test this series since that lot isn't in -next and I
> didn't get a copy.

Hmm, I wonder what happened with that series, as Mike was supposed to
try applying it to clk tree [1].

Mike, could you shed some light on this?

Best regards,
Tomasz

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20041/focus=21003

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mike Turquette Aug. 2, 2013, 10:53 p.m. UTC | #3 
Quoting Tomasz Figa (2013-07-28 05:38:25)
> On Sunday 28 of July 2013 13:30:51 Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:52:19AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Changes since v2:
> > >  - Reworked to use new PLL registration method introduced by Yadwinder
> > >  
> > >    Singh Brar's patch series:
> > >    ( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20041 )
> > 
> > I'm not able to test this series since that lot isn't in -next and I
> > didn't get a copy.
> 
> Hmm, I wonder what happened with that series, as Mike was supposed to
> try applying it to clk tree [1].
> 
> Mike, could you shed some light on this?

It's merged and available from my tree.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> 
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20041/focus=21003
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index f80efb6..7572d1d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -438,6 +438,77 @@  struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll46xx(const char *name,
 }
 
 /*
+ * PLL6552 Clock Type
+ */
+
+#define PLL6552_MDIV_MASK	0x3ff
+#define PLL6552_PDIV_MASK	0x3f
+#define PLL6552_SDIV_MASK	0x7
+#define PLL6552_MDIV_SHIFT	16
+#define PLL6552_PDIV_SHIFT	8
+#define PLL6552_SDIV_SHIFT	0
+
+static unsigned long samsung_pll6552_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+						unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
+	u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con;
+	u64 fvco = parent_rate;
+
+	pll_con = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg);
+	mdiv = (pll_con >> PLL6552_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6552_MDIV_MASK;
+	pdiv = (pll_con >> PLL6552_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6552_PDIV_MASK;
+	sdiv = (pll_con >> PLL6552_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6552_SDIV_MASK;
+
+	fvco *= mdiv;
+	do_div(fvco, (pdiv << sdiv));
+
+	return (unsigned long)fvco;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll6552_clk_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll6552_recalc_rate,
+};
+
+/*
+ * PLL6553 Clock Type
+ */
+
+#define PLL6553_MDIV_MASK	0xff
+#define PLL6553_PDIV_MASK	0x3f
+#define PLL6553_SDIV_MASK	0x7
+#define PLL6553_KDIV_MASK	0xffff
+#define PLL6553_MDIV_SHIFT	16
+#define PLL6553_PDIV_SHIFT	8
+#define PLL6553_SDIV_SHIFT	0
+#define PLL6553_KDIV_SHIFT	0
+
+static unsigned long samsung_pll6553_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+						unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
+	u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, pll_con0, pll_con1;
+	u64 fvco = parent_rate;
+
+	pll_con0 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg);
+	pll_con1 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg + 0x4);
+	mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL6553_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6553_MDIV_MASK;
+	pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL6553_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6553_PDIV_MASK;
+	sdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL6553_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6553_SDIV_MASK;
+	kdiv = (pll_con1 >> PLL6553_KDIV_SHIFT) & PLL6553_KDIV_MASK;
+
+	fvco *= (mdiv << 16) + kdiv;
+	do_div(fvco, (pdiv << sdiv));
+	fvco >>= 16;
+
+	return (unsigned long)fvco;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll6553_clk_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll6553_recalc_rate,
+};
+
+/*
  * PLL2550x Clock Type
  */
 
@@ -572,6 +643,12 @@  static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk,
 		else
 			init.ops = &samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops;
 		break;
+	case pll_6552:
+		init.ops = &samsung_pll6552_clk_ops;
+		break;
+	case pll_6553:
+		init.ops = &samsung_pll6553_clk_ops;
+		break;
 	default:
 		pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n",
 			__func__, pll_clk->name);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
index 95ae23d..cd11037 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@  enum samsung_pll_type {
 	pll_36xx,
 	pll_2550,
 	pll_2650,
+	pll_6552,
+	pll_6553,
 };
 
 #define PLL_35XX_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s)			\