| Message ID | 1377019903-14614-13-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
> + con0 |= (rate->mdiv << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) | > + (rate->pdiv << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT) | > + (rate->sdiv << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT) | > + (rate->vsel << PLL46XX_VSEL_SHIFT); > + > + /* Set PLL AFC, MFR and MRR values. */ This comments seems to be miss match with below code. > + con1 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg + 0x4); > + con1 &= ~((PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) | > + (PLL46XX_MFR_MASK << PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT) | > + (PLL46XX_MRR_MASK << PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT)); > + con1 |= (rate->kdiv << PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) | > + (rate->mfr << PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT) | > + (rate->mrr << PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT); > + <snip> > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > @@ -51,6 +51,28 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { > .afc = (_afc), \ > } > > +#define PLL_4600_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _vsel) \ > + { \ > + .rate = (_rate), \ > + .mdiv = (_m), \ > + .pdiv = (_p), \ > + .sdiv = (_s), \ > + .kdiv = (_k), \ > + .vsel = (_vsel), \ > + } > + > +#define PLL_4650_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _mfr, _mrr, _vsel) \ > + { \ > + .rate = (_rate), \ > + .mdiv = (_m), \ > + .pdiv = (_p), \ > + .sdiv = (_s), \ > + .kdiv = (_k), \ > + .mfr = (_mfr), \ > + .mrr = (_mrr), \ > + .vsel = (_vsel), \ > + } > + > /* NOTE: Rate table should be kept sorted in descending order. */ > > struct samsung_pll_rate_table { > @@ -60,6 +82,9 @@ struct samsung_pll_rate_table { > unsigned int sdiv; > unsigned int kdiv; > unsigned int afc; > + unsigned int mfr; > + unsigned int mrr; > + unsigned int vsel; > }; > This struct seems to be expanding too much. Can we re-think on options for using bit map same as register definition? It can reduce code in set_rate also little bit. Regards, Yadwinder -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 18:02:16 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: > > + con0 |= (rate->mdiv << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) | > > + (rate->pdiv << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT) | > > + (rate->sdiv << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT) | > > + (rate->vsel << PLL46XX_VSEL_SHIFT); > > + > > + /* Set PLL AFC, MFR and MRR values. */ > > This comments seems to be miss match with below code. Hmm, looks like a copy/paste error. Thanks for spotting. > > + con1 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg + 0x4); > > + con1 &= ~((PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) | > > + (PLL46XX_MFR_MASK << PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT) | > > + (PLL46XX_MRR_MASK << PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT)); > > + con1 |= (rate->kdiv << PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) | > > + (rate->mfr << PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT) | > > + (rate->mrr << PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT); > > + > > <snip> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > > @@ -51,6 +51,28 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { > > > > .afc = (_afc), \ > > > > } > > > > +#define PLL_4600_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _vsel) \ > > + { \ > > + .rate = (_rate), \ > > + .mdiv = (_m), \ > > + .pdiv = (_p), \ > > + .sdiv = (_s), \ > > + .kdiv = (_k), \ > > + .vsel = (_vsel), \ > > + } > > + > > +#define PLL_4650_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _mfr, _mrr, _vsel) > > \ + { \ + > > .rate = (_rate), \ + > > .mdiv = (_m), \ + > > .pdiv = (_p), \ + > > .sdiv = (_s), \ + > > .kdiv = (_k), \ + .mfr > > = (_mfr), \ + .mrr = > > (_mrr), \ + .vsel = > > (_vsel), \ + } > > + > > > > /* NOTE: Rate table should be kept sorted in descending order. */ > > > > struct samsung_pll_rate_table { > > > > @@ -60,6 +82,9 @@ struct samsung_pll_rate_table { > > > > unsigned int sdiv; > > unsigned int kdiv; > > unsigned int afc; > > > > + unsigned int mfr; > > + unsigned int mrr; > > + unsigned int vsel; > > > > }; > > This struct seems to be expanding too much. I don't think it's a problem. How many bytes such tables can occupy in a system? > Can we re-think on options for using bit map same as register > definition? It can reduce code in set_rate also little bit. IMHO it is more clear what the code does when accessing a single coefficient at once. In addition you still would need to preserve bitfields that are not changed by the driver and also unpack some of the coefficients anyway, like pdiv that is used to calculate lock time. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> <snip> >> >> > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h >> > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h >> > @@ -51,6 +51,28 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { >> > >> > .afc = (_afc), \ >> > >> > } >> > >> > +#define PLL_4600_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _vsel) \ >> > + { \ >> > + .rate = (_rate), \ >> > + .mdiv = (_m), \ >> > + .pdiv = (_p), \ >> > + .sdiv = (_s), \ >> > + .kdiv = (_k), \ >> > + .vsel = (_vsel), \ >> > + } >> > + >> > +#define PLL_4650_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _mfr, _mrr, _vsel) >> > \ + { \ + >> > .rate = (_rate), \ + >> > .mdiv = (_m), \ + >> > .pdiv = (_p), \ + >> > .sdiv = (_s), \ + >> > .kdiv = (_k), \ + .mfr >> > = (_mfr), \ + .mrr = >> > (_mrr), \ + .vsel = >> > (_vsel), \ + } >> > + >> > >> > /* NOTE: Rate table should be kept sorted in descending order. */ >> > >> > struct samsung_pll_rate_table { >> > >> > @@ -60,6 +82,9 @@ struct samsung_pll_rate_table { >> > >> > unsigned int sdiv; >> > unsigned int kdiv; >> > unsigned int afc; >> > >> > + unsigned int mfr; >> > + unsigned int mrr; >> > + unsigned int vsel; >> > >> > }; >> >> This struct seems to be expanding too much. > > I don't think it's a problem. How many bytes such tables can occupy in a > system? > no doubt comparing with memory size its negligible.. but comparing only struct size and coding lines it seems costlier :) . >> Can we re-think on options for using bit map same as register >> definition? It can reduce code in set_rate also little bit. > > IMHO it is more clear what the code does when accessing a single > coefficient at once. > > In addition you still would need to preserve bitfields that are not changed > by the driver Sorry, I can't see any such problem, it will OR only the required bits. > and also unpack some of the coefficients anyway, like pdiv > that is used to calculate lock time. Agree, but cases of unpacking will always be less than cases of shifting and packing. Anyways, its only MHO :). Regards, Yadwinder -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c index 8a008ca..c1f1c87 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c @@ -410,10 +410,13 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll45xx_clk_min_ops = { /* * PLL46xx Clock Type */ +#define PLL46XX_LOCK_FACTOR 3000 +#define PLL46XX_VSEL_MASK (1) #define PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK (0x1FF) #define PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK (0x3F) #define PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK (0x7) +#define PLL46XX_VSEL_SHIFT (27) #define PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT (16) #define PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT (8) #define PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT (0) @@ -421,6 +424,15 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll45xx_clk_min_ops = { #define PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK (0xFFFF) #define PLL4650C_KDIV_MASK (0xFFF) #define PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT (0) +#define PLL46XX_MFR_MASK (0x3F) +#define PLL46XX_MRR_MASK (0x1F) +#define PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT (0) +#define PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT (16) +#define PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT (24) + +#define PLL46XX_ENABLE BIT(31) +#define PLL46XX_LOCKED BIT(29) +#define PLL46XX_VSEL BIT(27) static unsigned long samsung_pll46xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate) @@ -445,8 +457,102 @@ static unsigned long samsung_pll46xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, return (unsigned long)fvco; } +static bool samsung_pll46xx_mpk_change(u32 pll_con0, u32 pll_con1, + const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate) +{ + u32 old_mdiv, old_pdiv, old_kdiv; + + old_mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK; + old_pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK; + old_kdiv = (pll_con1 >> PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) & PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; + + return (old_mdiv != rate->mdiv || old_pdiv != rate->pdiv + || old_kdiv != rate->kdiv); +} + +static int samsung_pll46xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, + unsigned long prate) +{ + struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); + const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate; + u32 con0, con1, lock; + ktime_t start; + + /* Get required rate settings from table */ + rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate); + if (!rate) { + pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__, + drate, __clk_get_name(hw->clk)); + return -EINVAL; + } + + con0 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg); + con1 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg + 0x4); + + if (!(samsung_pll46xx_mpk_change(con0, con1, rate))) { + /* If only s change, change just s value only*/ + con0 &= ~(PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); + con0 |= rate->sdiv << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT; + __raw_writel(con0, pll->con_reg); + + return 0; + } + + /* Set PLL lock time. */ + lock = rate->pdiv * PLL46XX_LOCK_FACTOR; + if (lock > 0xffff) + /* Maximum lock time bitfield is 16-bit. */ + lock = 0xffff; + + /* Set PLL PMS and VSEL values. */ + con0 &= ~((PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) | + (PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT) | + (PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT) | + (PLL46XX_VSEL_MASK << PLL46XX_VSEL_SHIFT)); + con0 |= (rate->mdiv << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) | + (rate->pdiv << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT) | + (rate->sdiv << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT) | + (rate->vsel << PLL46XX_VSEL_SHIFT); + + /* Set PLL AFC, MFR and MRR values. */ + con1 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg + 0x4); + con1 &= ~((PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) | + (PLL46XX_MFR_MASK << PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT) | + (PLL46XX_MRR_MASK << PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT)); + con1 |= (rate->kdiv << PLL46XX_KDIV_SHIFT) | + (rate->mfr << PLL46XX_MFR_SHIFT) | + (rate->mrr << PLL46XX_MRR_SHIFT); + + /* Write configuration to PLL */ + __raw_writel(lock, pll->lock_reg); + __raw_writel(con0, pll->con_reg); + __raw_writel(con1, pll->con_reg + 0x4); + + /* Wait for locking. */ + start = ktime_get(); + while (!(__raw_readl(pll->con_reg) & PLL46XX_LOCKED)) { + ktime_t delta = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start); + + if (ktime_to_ms(delta) > PLL_TIMEOUT_MS) { + pr_err("%s: could not lock PLL %s\n", + __func__, __clk_get_name(hw->clk)); + return -EFAULT; + } + + cpu_relax(); + } + + return 0; +} + static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll46xx_clk_ops = { .recalc_rate = samsung_pll46xx_recalc_rate, + .round_rate = samsung_pll_round_rate, + .set_rate = samsung_pll46xx_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll46xx_clk_min_ops = { + .recalc_rate = samsung_pll46xx_recalc_rate, }; /* @@ -757,7 +863,10 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk, case pll_4600: case pll_4650: case pll_4650c: - init.ops = &samsung_pll46xx_clk_ops; + if (!pll->rate_table) + init.ops = &samsung_pll46xx_clk_min_ops; + else + init.ops = &samsung_pll46xx_clk_ops; break; default: pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n", diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h index 7de5e3e..53847e0 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h @@ -51,6 +51,28 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { .afc = (_afc), \ } +#define PLL_4600_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _vsel) \ + { \ + .rate = (_rate), \ + .mdiv = (_m), \ + .pdiv = (_p), \ + .sdiv = (_s), \ + .kdiv = (_k), \ + .vsel = (_vsel), \ + } + +#define PLL_4650_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k, _mfr, _mrr, _vsel) \ + { \ + .rate = (_rate), \ + .mdiv = (_m), \ + .pdiv = (_p), \ + .sdiv = (_s), \ + .kdiv = (_k), \ + .mfr = (_mfr), \ + .mrr = (_mrr), \ + .vsel = (_vsel), \ + } + /* NOTE: Rate table should be kept sorted in descending order. */ struct samsung_pll_rate_table { @@ -60,6 +82,9 @@ struct samsung_pll_rate_table { unsigned int sdiv; unsigned int kdiv; unsigned int afc; + unsigned int mfr; + unsigned int mrr; + unsigned int vsel; }; extern struct clk *samsung_clk_register_pll6552(const char *name,