ARM: exynos: mark machine descriptor functions static

Commit Message

Olof Johansson June 3, 2014, 4:57 a.m. UTC

There's no reason to export these functions, and I have no idea why
they have over time ended up in the header file. As a result, none of
the checker tools caught it (i.e. sparse was silent on it).

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[e-mail]>
---

I'm guessing with all the churn right now this might not apply, so it
might need manual application around -rc1.

There's definitely room for more cleanup in common.h.

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h |    6 ------
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Tomasz Figa June 10, 2014, 1:07 p.m. UTC | #1

Hi Olof,

On 03.06.2014 06:57, Olof Johansson wrote:
> There's no reason to export these functions, and I have no idea why
> they have over time ended up in the header file. As a result, none of
> the checker tools caught it (i.e. sparse was silent on it).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[e-mail]>
> ---
> 
> I'm guessing with all the churn right now this might not apply, so it
> might need manual application around -rc1.
> 
> There's definitely room for more cleanup in common.h.
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h |    6 ------
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

Similar patch and few other clean-up patches were posted some time ago
on the list as a part of PMU rework series, but somehow got missed. They
can be applied independently from rest of the series which is still
under discussion.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [e-mail]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
index 5a3a1ec..0b0b6d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
@@ -116,13 +116,7 @@  void mct_init(void __iomem *base, int irq_g0, int irq_l0, int irq_l1);
 struct map_desc;
 extern void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr;
 extern void __iomem *sysram_base_addr;
-void exynos_init_io(void);
-void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd);
 void exynos_sysram_init(void);
-void exynos_cpuidle_init(void);
-void exynos_cpufreq_init(void);
-void exynos_init_late(void);
-
 void exynos_firmware_init(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 9183675..c4f9c3d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@  static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
 	},
 };
 
-void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
+static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
 	u32 val = 0x1;
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@  static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
 	.id                = -1,
 };
 
-void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
+static void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
 {
 	if (soc_is_exynos5440())
 		return;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@  void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
 	platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
 }
 
-void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
+static void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
 {
 	platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
 }
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@  void __init exynos_sysram_init(void)
 	}
 }
 
-void __init exynos_init_late(void)
+static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
 {
 	if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
 		/* to be supported later */
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@  static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
 		iotable_init(exynos5_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_iodesc));
 }
 
-void __init exynos_init_io(void)
+static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
 {
 	debug_ll_io_init();