diff mbox

[v5,1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT

Message ID 1403705032-14835-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Pankaj Dubey June 25, 2014, 2:03 p.m. UTC
Add support for mapping Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU)
base address from device tree.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

Comments

Tomasz Figa June 30, 2014, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Pankaj,

In general the patch seems quite nice, but please see few comments inline.

On 25.06.2014 16:03, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Add support for mapping Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU)
> base address from device tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

[snip]

> +static void exynos_map_pmu(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = NULL;

nit: Unnecessary variable initialization.

> +
> +	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
> +

nit: Unnecessary blank line.

> +	if (!np) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to find PMU node\n");
> +		return;

Returning here probably doesn't make too much sense, especially when you
just panic if the mapping fails and you remove the static mapping in
patch 2/5, so backwards compatibility isn't provided anyway.

So something like this might be a better idea:

	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
	if (np)
		pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);

	if (!pmu_base_addr)
		panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");

> +	}
> +
> +	pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +
> +	if (!pmu_base_addr)
> +		panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void __init exynos_init_time(void)
> +{
> +	/* Nothing to do timer specific.
> +	 * Since platsmp.c needs pmu base address by the time
> +	 * DT is not unflatten so we can't use DT APIs before
> +	 * init_time
> +	 */
> +	exynos_map_pmu();

Would moving this to .init_irq() callback work too? There are more
things happening in .init_time() so it seems more fragile and some
platforms (e.g. mach-tegra) do such platform-specific initialization in
.init_irq() instead.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Pankaj Dubey July 5, 2014, 6:31 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Tomasz,

On Monday, June 30, 2014 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 
> Hi Pankaj,
> 
> In general the patch seems quite nice, but please see few comments inline.
> 
> On 25.06.2014 16:03, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > Add support for mapping Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU) base
> > address from device tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   45
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > +static void exynos_map_pmu(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_node *np = NULL;
> 
> nit: Unnecessary variable initialization.
>

OK, will correct it.
 
> > +
> > +	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
> > +
> 
> nit: Unnecessary blank line.
> 

OK, will remove this.

> > +	if (!np) {
> > +		pr_err("Failed to find PMU node\n");
> > +		return;
> 
> Returning here probably doesn't make too much sense, especially when you
just panic
> if the mapping fails and you remove the static mapping in patch 2/5, so
backwards
> compatibility isn't provided anyway.
> 
> So something like this might be a better idea:
> 
> 	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
> 	if (np)
> 		pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
> 
> 	if (!pmu_base_addr)
> 		panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
> 

Yes, this will be better. I will modify this part.

> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > +
> > +	if (!pmu_base_addr)
> > +		panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n"); }
> > +
> > +static void __init exynos_init_time(void) {
> > +	/* Nothing to do timer specific.
> > +	 * Since platsmp.c needs pmu base address by the time
> > +	 * DT is not unflatten so we can't use DT APIs before
> > +	 * init_time
> > +	 */
> > +	exynos_map_pmu();
> 
> Would moving this to .init_irq() callback work too? There are more things
happening
> in .init_time() so it seems more fragile and some platforms (e.g.
mach-tegra) do such
> platform-specific initialization in
> .init_irq() instead.
> 

I need to check this, if it works I will update as suggested.

> Best regards,
> Tomasz

Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
index 3f25f89..f3114be 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@  IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5800, EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
 
 extern void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr;
 extern void __iomem *sysram_base_addr;
+extern void __iomem *pmu_base_addr;
 
 void exynos_firmware_init(void);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 4a69b3f..82dabc8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ 
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
+#include <linux/clocksource.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
@@ -31,6 +33,8 @@ 
 #include "regs-pmu.h"
 #include "regs-sys.h"
 
+void __iomem *pmu_base_addr;
+
 static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = {
 	{
 		.virtual	= (unsigned long)S3C_VA_SYS,
@@ -231,6 +235,46 @@  static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
 	exynos_map_io();
 }
 
+static const struct of_device_id exynos_dt_pmu_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-pmu" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-pmu" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-pmu" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" },
+	{},
+};
+
+static void exynos_map_pmu(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = NULL;
+
+	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
+
+	if (!np) {
+		pr_err("Failed to find PMU node\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
+
+	if (!pmu_base_addr)
+		panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
+}
+
+static void __init exynos_init_time(void)
+{
+	/* Nothing to do timer specific.
+	 * Since platsmp.c needs pmu base address by the time
+	 * DT is not unflatten so we can't use DT APIs before
+	 * init_time
+	 */
+	exynos_map_pmu();
+
+	of_clk_init(NULL);
+	clocksource_of_init();
+}
+
 static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
 {
 	struct device_node *i2c_np;
@@ -306,6 +350,7 @@  DT_MACHINE_START(EXYNOS_DT, "SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.smp		= smp_ops(exynos_smp_ops),
 	.map_io		= exynos_init_io,
 	.init_early	= exynos_firmware_init,
+	.init_time	= exynos_init_time,
 	.init_machine	= exynos_dt_machine_init,
 	.init_late	= exynos_init_late,
 	.dt_compat	= exynos_dt_compat,