@@ -39,10 +39,13 @@
static const struct mfd_cell max77686_devs[] = {
{ .name = "max77686-pmic", },
- { .name = "max77686-rtc", },
{ .name = "max77686-clk", },
};
+static const struct mfd_cell max77686_rtc_dev[] = {
+ { .name = "max77686-rtc", },
+};
+
static const struct mfd_cell max77802_devs[] = {
{ .name = "max77802-pmic", },
{ .name = "max77802-clk", },
@@ -332,14 +335,27 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
goto err_del_irqc;
}
+ if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
+ ret = mfd_add_devices(&max77686->rtc->dev, -1, max77686_rtc_dev,
+ 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&max77686->rtc->dev,
+ "failed to add RTC device %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_del_rtc_irqc;
+ }
+ }
+
ret = mfd_add_devices(max77686->dev, -1, cells, n_devs, NULL, 0, NULL);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add MFD devices: %d\n", ret);
- goto err_del_rtc_irqc;
+ goto err_del_rtc_dev;
}
return 0;
+err_del_rtc_dev:
+ if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
+ mfd_remove_devices(&max77686->rtc->dev);
err_del_rtc_irqc:
regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
err_del_irqc:
@@ -356,6 +372,8 @@ static int max77686_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
struct max77686_dev *max77686 = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
mfd_remove_devices(max77686->dev);
+ if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
+ mfd_remove_devices(&max77686->rtc->dev);
regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
rtc have different i2c client than power(pmic) block. So rtc device should sit under its own i2c client in device hierarchy, which reflects in sysfs also. This patch modifies code to register rtc cell with rtc->dev as parent. Without this patch : driver max77686-pmic modalias power uevent max77686-clk max77686-rtc name subsystem After applying patch : driver/ modalias power/ uevent max77686-rtc/ name subsystem/ Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com> --- Or Can we follow another (exhaustive but more cleaner) approach, which will be more like code refactoring and cleanup rather than only fix: Since rtc uses i2c client, which gets created using i2c_new_dummy() and is not shared by any other cell of max77686. So we can covert rtc platform driver itself to i2c client driver. It will also allow to expilicitly describe max77686-rtc in DT which we can't do now. It can be applicable to some other existing and new mfd pmic drivers. Any suggestion/comments ? --- drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)