| Message ID | 1448542040-22057-3-git-send-email-inki.dae@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
[adding Ajay Kumar who added the bridge support] Hello Inki, On 11/26/2015 09:47 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > This patch fixes wrong return type when dt binding of bridge device > failed. > > If a board has a bridge device then of_graph_get_remote_port_parent > function shouldn't be NULL. So this patch will return a proper error > type so that the deferred probe isn't triggered. > > Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > index 0b53045..c77fb83 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > @@ -1436,8 +1436,10 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > of_node_put(bridge_node); > if (!dp->ptn_bridge) > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > - } else > - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + } else { > + DRM_ERROR("no port node for bridge device.\n"); > + return -ENXIO; > + } > } > As I mentioned in the other thread, I wonder if -ENXIO is the best errno code in this case. Shouldn't -EINVAL be more appropriate since is about an invalid DTB? > pm_runtime_enable(dev); > Best regards,
Hi Javier, 2015? 11? 26? 22:35? Javier Martinez Canillas ?(?) ? ?: > [adding Ajay Kumar who added the bridge support] > > Hello Inki, > > On 11/26/2015 09:47 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >> This patch fixes wrong return type when dt binding of bridge device >> failed. >> >> If a board has a bridge device then of_graph_get_remote_port_parent >> function shouldn't be NULL. So this patch will return a proper error >> type so that the deferred probe isn't triggered. >> >> Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> index 0b53045..c77fb83 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> @@ -1436,8 +1436,10 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> of_node_put(bridge_node); >> if (!dp->ptn_bridge) >> return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> - } else >> - return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> + } else { >> + DRM_ERROR("no port node for bridge device.\n"); >> + return -ENXIO; >> + } >> } >> > > As I mentioned in the other thread, I wonder if -ENXIO is the best errno > code in this case. Shouldn't -EINVAL be more appropriate since is about > an invalid DTB? Seems better to use -EINVAL. Thanks, Inki Dae > >> pm_runtime_enable(dev); >> > > Best regards, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c index 0b53045..c77fb83 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c @@ -1436,8 +1436,10 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) of_node_put(bridge_node); if (!dp->ptn_bridge) return -EPROBE_DEFER; - } else - return -EPROBE_DEFER; + } else { + DRM_ERROR("no port node for bridge device.\n"); + return -ENXIO; + } } pm_runtime_enable(dev);
This patch fixes wrong return type when dt binding of bridge device failed. If a board has a bridge device then of_graph_get_remote_port_parent function shouldn't be NULL. So this patch will return a proper error type so that the deferred probe isn't triggered. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)