From patchwork Wed Jan 9 13:43:03 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Krzysztof Kozlowski X-Patchwork-Id: 10754117 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797B2746 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681CD28F17 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 5BED228F23; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:43:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D5128F17 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730944AbfAINnM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:43:12 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41632 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730694AbfAINnL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:43:11 -0500 Received: from PC-kkoz.proceq.com (unknown [213.160.61.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71B1420660; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:43:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547041391; bh=B8EnQXnmQF8aRO0BOJvkqohJeQcNtH7sFCi0YBZ+gLw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Okkf2CmbjiQOzyld8AoLl1OfRu0bpXW0JtMFyhkt6OxSU2wEQhbPu0CjL4bGNh0Mn OPOq2QJZpjpn5qjX2giALYaHyhaLl6z7WRabhCMpI8qRAF8DNG7fnZzYeEY2xSycE/ JZA0/SEVK9o2n4nsDieHlTsfbgRVtS4YI4gzkQFM= From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?Pawe=C5=82_Chmiel?= , Tomasz Figa Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: s5pv210: Fix onenand's unit address format warning Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:43:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1547041383-16924-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP According to Devicetree specification, the unit-address must match the first address specified in the reg property of the node. Fix the DTC warning onenand node: arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:81.29-93.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/onenand@b0000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "b0600000" Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Tested-by: Paweł Chmiel --- The remaining warning is wrong clock-controller subnode of fimc camera. arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:578.32-580.6: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/camera/clock-controller: missing or empty reg/ranges property The subnode in my understanding does not follow bindings and the driver. The driver with current s5pv210.dtsi will not register a clock provider... but I do not have a device to confirm this. --- arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi index cc22c9db80d2..26ea5c66d8ce 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ }; }; - onenand: onenand@b0000000 { + onenand: onenand@b0600000 { compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-onenand"; reg = <0xb0600000 0x2000>, <0xb0000000 0x20000>,