| Message ID | 20161226052029.10552-2-jh80.chung@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | RFC |
| Headers | show |
Hi Jaehoon, On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: > This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy. > When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe, > it needs to control the phy resgister. > But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++ > drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig > index fe00f91..94b0433 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig > @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD > This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller > present on Exynos5 SoC series. > > +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE > + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver" Is there a reason for this not being 'tristate' ? > + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF > + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433 > + select GENERIC_PHY > + help > + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series. If this driver is for Exynos5433, then same should come in this help text as well. > + This driver provides PHY interface for Exynos PCIe controller. > + > config PHY_PISTACHIO_USB > tristate "IMG Pistachio USB2.0 PHY driver" > depends on MACH_PISTACHIO > diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile > index a534cf5..586344d 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4X12_USB2) += phy-exynos4x12-usb2.o > phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2) += phy-exynos5250-usb2.o > phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE) += phy-exynos-pcie.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_INNO_USB2) += phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.o > diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0f5eefd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c > @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ > +/* > + * Samsung EXYNOS SoC series PCIe PHY driver > + * > + * Phy provider for PCIe controller on Exynos SoC series > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > + * Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/regmap.h> > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> nit: It's good to have these includes in alphabetical order. > + > +#define PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET 0x730 > +#define PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 0x4) > + > +/* Sysreg Fsys register offset and bit for Exynos5433 */ > +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET 0x208 > +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK 0xFF > +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET BIT(4) > +#define PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON 0x1010 > +#define PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN BIT(0) > +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET 0x1020 > +#define PCIE_PHY_RESET BIT(0) > +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET 0x1040 > +#define PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET BIT(0) > +#define PCIE_REFCLK BIT(1) > +#define PCIE_REFCLK_MASK 0x16 > +#define PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE BIT(5) > + > +enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type { > + PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, > +}; > + > +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data { > + enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type ctrl_type; Why do we need this controller type ? If there are changes in the IP between different version, then you can as well use different compatibles. > + u32 pmureg_offset; /* PMU_REG offset */ Please use top comments. > + struct phy_ops *ops; > +}; > + > +/* for Exynos pcie phy */ > +struct exynos_pcie_phy { > + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data; > + struct regmap *pmureg; > + struct regmap *fsysreg; > + void __iomem *phy_base; just 'base' ? > +}; > + > +static void exynos_pcie_phy_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 offset) > +{ > + writel(val, base + offset); > +} > + > +static int exynos_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) > +{ > + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > + > + if (ep->fsysreg) { > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET, > + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 1); > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET, > + PCIE_MAC_RESET, 0); > + /* PHY refclk 24MHz */ > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, > + PCIE_REFCLK_MASK, PCIE_REFCLK); > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, > + PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET, 0); > + } > + > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x11, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3)); > + > + /* band gap reference on */ > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x20)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4b)); > + > + /* jitter tunning */ > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x02, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x41, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x21)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x7F, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x14)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xC0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x15)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x61, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x36)); > + > + /* D0 uninit.. */ > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3D)); > + > + /* 24MHz */ > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x94, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x8)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x9)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x93, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xA)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x6B, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xC)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA5, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xF)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x16)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA3, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x17)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x1A)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x71, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x23)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x4C, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x24)); > + > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x0E, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x26)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x14, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x48, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x43)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x44)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x03, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x45)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x48)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x13, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x54)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x04, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x31)); > + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x32)); > + > + if (ep->fsysreg) { > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET, > + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 0); > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET, > + PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK, PCIE_MAC_RESET); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int exynos_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy) > +{ > + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > + > + if (ep->pmureg) { > + if (regmap_update_bits(ep->pmureg, ep->drv_data->pmureg_offset, > + BIT(0), 1)) > + dev_warn(&phy->dev, "Failed to update regmap bit.\n"); > + } > + > + if (ep->fsysreg) { > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, > + PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE, 0); > + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON, > + PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN, 0); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct phy_ops exynos_phy_ops = { const ? > + .init = exynos_pcie_phy_init, > + .power_on = exynos_pcie_phy_power_on, > +}; > + > +static const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data exynos5433_pcie_phy_data = { > + .ctrl_type = PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, > + .pmureg_offset = PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET, > + .ops = &exynos_phy_ops, > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id exynos_pcie_phy_match[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-pcie-phy", > + .data = &exynos5433_pcie_phy_data, > + }, > + {} missing comma after braces. > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_phy_match); > + > +static int exynos_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct exynos_pcie_phy *exynos_phy; > + struct phy *generic_phy; > + struct phy_provider *phy_provider; > + struct resource *res; > + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data; > + const struct of_device_id *match; > + > + exynos_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_phy), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!exynos_phy) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + exynos_phy->phy_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base)) > + return PTR_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base); > + > + exynos_phy->pmureg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, > + "samsung,pmureg-phandle"); > + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->pmureg)) { > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "pmureg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n"); > + exynos_phy->pmureg = NULL; > + } Is this really optional ? There should be a failure path for IP versions that require this compulsorily. > + > + match = of_match_node(exynos_pcie_phy_match, pdev->dev.of_node); > + drv_data = match->data; Please use of_device_get_match_data(). > + exynos_phy->drv_data = drv_data; > + > + exynos_phy->fsysreg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, > + "samsung,fsys-sysreg"); > + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->fsysreg)) { > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Fsysreg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n"); > + exynos_phy->fsysreg = NULL; > + } Same here, is this optional ? > + > + generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, drv_data->ops); > + if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(generic_phy); > + } > + > + phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, exynos_phy); > + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate); > + > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider); > +} > + > +static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_phy_driver = { > + .probe = exynos_pcie_phy_probe, > + .driver = { > + .of_match_table = exynos_pcie_phy_match, > + .name = "exynos_pcie_phy", > + } > +}; > +module_platform_driver(exynos_pcie_phy_driver); > -- > 2.10.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thanks Vivek
Hi Vivek, On 12/27/2016 02:53 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: >> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy. >> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe, >> it needs to control the phy resgister. >> But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++ >> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >> index fe00f91..94b0433 100644 >> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >> @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD >> This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller >> present on Exynos5 SoC series. >> >> +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE >> + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver" > > Is there a reason for this not being 'tristate' ? Will change. > >> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF >> + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433 >> + select GENERIC_PHY >> + help >> + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series. > > If this driver is for Exynos5433, then same should come in this help > text as well. will support the other exynos series. I'm working on refactoring exynos5440 with PHY generic Framework. Then this drive is not for only Exnyos5433. how about? > >> + This driver provides PHY interface for Exynos PCIe controller. >> + >> config PHY_PISTACHIO_USB >> tristate "IMG Pistachio USB2.0 PHY driver" >> depends on MACH_PISTACHIO >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile >> index a534cf5..586344d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile >> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4X12_USB2) += phy-exynos4x12-usb2.o >> phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2) += phy-exynos5250-usb2.o >> phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE) += phy-exynos-pcie.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_INNO_USB2) += phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.o >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..0f5eefd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ >> +/* >> + * Samsung EXYNOS SoC series PCIe PHY driver >> + * >> + * Phy provider for PCIe controller on Exynos SoC series >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> + * Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/delay.h> >> +#include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/of.h> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h> >> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> >> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >> +#include <linux/regmap.h> >> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > > nit: It's good to have these includes in alphabetical order. Will fix. > >> + >> +#define PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET 0x730 >> +#define PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 0x4) >> + >> +/* Sysreg Fsys register offset and bit for Exynos5433 */ >> +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET 0x208 >> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK 0xFF >> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET BIT(4) >> +#define PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON 0x1010 >> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN BIT(0) >> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET 0x1020 >> +#define PCIE_PHY_RESET BIT(0) >> +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET 0x1040 >> +#define PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET BIT(0) >> +#define PCIE_REFCLK BIT(1) >> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_MASK 0x16 >> +#define PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE BIT(5) >> + >> +enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type { >> + PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, >> +}; >> + >> +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data { >> + enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type ctrl_type; > > Why do we need this controller type ? > If there are changes in the IP between different version, > then you can as well use different compatibles. Do you mean is the using "of_device_is_compatible()"? > >> + u32 pmureg_offset; /* PMU_REG offset */ > > Please use top comments. > >> + struct phy_ops *ops; >> +}; >> + >> +/* for Exynos pcie phy */ >> +struct exynos_pcie_phy { >> + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data; >> + struct regmap *pmureg; >> + struct regmap *fsysreg; >> + void __iomem *phy_base; > > just 'base' ? Will change > >> +}; >> + >> +static void exynos_pcie_phy_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 offset) >> +{ >> + writel(val, base + offset); >> +} >> + >> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) >> +{ >> + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy); >> + >> + if (ep->fsysreg) { >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET, >> + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 1); >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET, >> + PCIE_MAC_RESET, 0); >> + /* PHY refclk 24MHz */ >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, >> + PCIE_REFCLK_MASK, PCIE_REFCLK); >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, >> + PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET, 0); >> + } >> + >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x11, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3)); >> + >> + /* band gap reference on */ >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x20)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4b)); >> + >> + /* jitter tunning */ >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x02, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x41, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x21)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x7F, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x14)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xC0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x15)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x61, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x36)); >> + >> + /* D0 uninit.. */ >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3D)); >> + >> + /* 24MHz */ >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x94, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x8)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x9)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x93, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xA)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x6B, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xC)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA5, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xF)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x16)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA3, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x17)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x1A)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x71, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x23)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x4C, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x24)); >> + >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x0E, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x26)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x14, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x48, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x43)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x44)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x03, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x45)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x48)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x13, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x54)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x04, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x31)); >> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x32)); >> + >> + if (ep->fsysreg) { >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET, >> + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 0); >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET, >> + PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK, PCIE_MAC_RESET); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy) >> +{ >> + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy); >> + >> + if (ep->pmureg) { >> + if (regmap_update_bits(ep->pmureg, ep->drv_data->pmureg_offset, >> + BIT(0), 1)) >> + dev_warn(&phy->dev, "Failed to update regmap bit.\n"); >> + } >> + >> + if (ep->fsysreg) { >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, >> + PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE, 0); >> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON, >> + PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN, 0); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static struct phy_ops exynos_phy_ops = { > > const ? Yep. > >> + .init = exynos_pcie_phy_init, >> + .power_on = exynos_pcie_phy_power_on, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data exynos5433_pcie_phy_data = { >> + .ctrl_type = PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, >> + .pmureg_offset = PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET, >> + .ops = &exynos_phy_ops, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_pcie_phy_match[] = { >> + { >> + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-pcie-phy", >> + .data = &exynos5433_pcie_phy_data, >> + }, >> + {} > > missing comma after braces. Will fix. > >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_phy_match); >> + >> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; >> + struct exynos_pcie_phy *exynos_phy; >> + struct phy *generic_phy; >> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider; >> + struct resource *res; >> + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data; >> + const struct of_device_id *match; >> + >> + exynos_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_phy), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!exynos_phy) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >> + exynos_phy->phy_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); >> + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base)) >> + return PTR_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base); >> + >> + exynos_phy->pmureg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, >> + "samsung,pmureg-phandle"); >> + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->pmureg)) { >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "pmureg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n"); >> + exynos_phy->pmureg = NULL; >> + } > > Is this really optional ? There should be a failure path for IP versions that > require this compulsorily. Agreed. Will fix. > >> + >> + match = of_match_node(exynos_pcie_phy_match, pdev->dev.of_node); >> + drv_data = match->data; > > Please use of_device_get_match_data(). Ok. > >> + exynos_phy->drv_data = drv_data; >> + >> + exynos_phy->fsysreg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, >> + "samsung,fsys-sysreg"); >> + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->fsysreg)) { >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Fsysreg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n"); >> + exynos_phy->fsysreg = NULL; >> + } > > Same here, is this optional ? Will fix. Thanks for reviewing. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > >> + >> + generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, drv_data->ops); >> + if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR(generic_phy); >> + } >> + >> + phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, exynos_phy); >> + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate); >> + >> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider); >> +} >> + >> +static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_phy_driver = { >> + .probe = exynos_pcie_phy_probe, >> + .driver = { >> + .of_match_table = exynos_pcie_phy_match, >> + .name = "exynos_pcie_phy", >> + } >> +}; >> +module_platform_driver(exynos_pcie_phy_driver); >> -- >> 2.10.2 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Thanks > Vivek > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Jaehoon, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On 12/27/2016 02:53 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Hi Jaehoon, >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: >>> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy. >>> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe, >>> it needs to control the phy resgister. >>> But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++ >>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>> index fe00f91..94b0433 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>> @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD >>> This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller >>> present on Exynos5 SoC series. >>> >>> +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE >>> + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver" >> >> Is there a reason for this not being 'tristate' ? > > Will change. I notice that PCI_EXYNOS5433 is bool as well. If the host has to be 'bool' then it makes sense to have phy also bool as well. But if PCI_EXYNOS5433 can be made tristate, then this also changes to tristate. > >> >>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF >>> + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433 >>> + select GENERIC_PHY >>> + help >>> + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series. >> >> If this driver is for Exynos5433, then same should come in this help >> text as well. > > will support the other exynos series. > I'm working on refactoring exynos5440 with PHY generic Framework. > Then this drive is not for only Exnyos5433. how about? Ok, it's good then. My only concern is 'depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433' makes it look like it is for EXYNOS5433. I am fine if that changes as well. [...] >>> + >>> +#define PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET 0x730 >>> +#define PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 0x4) >>> + >>> +/* Sysreg Fsys register offset and bit for Exynos5433 */ >>> +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET 0x208 >>> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK 0xFF >>> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET BIT(4) >>> +#define PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON 0x1010 >>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN BIT(0) >>> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET 0x1020 >>> +#define PCIE_PHY_RESET BIT(0) >>> +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET 0x1040 >>> +#define PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET BIT(0) >>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK BIT(1) >>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_MASK 0x16 >>> +#define PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE BIT(5) >>> + >>> +enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type { >>> + PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data { >>> + enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type ctrl_type; >> >> Why do we need this controller type ? >> If there are changes in the IP between different version, >> then you can as well use different compatibles. > > Do you mean is the using "of_device_is_compatible()"? I meant that multiple compatible strings can be added based on the IP versions. And any IP specific data can be put in the .data field of 'of_device_id' structure. If there's more to differentiate between the IP versions at runtime, you can use of_device_is_compatible(). [...]
Hi Vivek, On 12/28/2016 05:58 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: >> Hi Vivek, >> >> On 12/27/2016 02:53 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> Hi Jaehoon, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: >>>> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy. >>>> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe, >>>> it needs to control the phy resgister. >>>> But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++ >>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + >>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>>> index fe00f91..94b0433 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>>> @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD >>>> This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller >>>> present on Exynos5 SoC series. >>>> >>>> +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE >>>> + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver" >>> >>> Is there a reason for this not being 'tristate' ? >> >> Will change. > > I notice that PCI_EXYNOS5433 is bool as well. > If the host has to be 'bool' then it makes sense to have phy > also bool as well. But if PCI_EXYNOS5433 can be made > tristate, then this also changes to tristate. Right. I understood what you said. > >> >>> >>>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF >>>> + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433 >>>> + select GENERIC_PHY >>>> + help >>>> + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series. >>> >>> If this driver is for Exynos5433, then same should come in this help >>> text as well. >> >> will support the other exynos series. >> I'm working on refactoring exynos5440 with PHY generic Framework. >> Then this drive is not for only Exnyos5433. how about? > > Ok, it's good then. My only concern is 'depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433' > makes it look like it is for EXYNOS5433. I am fine if that changes as well. I will not put PCI_EXYNOS5433, just will use the PCI_EXYNOS. Because it will be supported only one file as pci-exynos.c > > [...] > >>>> + >>>> +#define PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET 0x730 >>>> +#define PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 0x4) >>>> + >>>> +/* Sysreg Fsys register offset and bit for Exynos5433 */ >>>> +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET 0x208 >>>> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK 0xFF >>>> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET BIT(4) >>>> +#define PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON 0x1010 >>>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN BIT(0) >>>> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET 0x1020 >>>> +#define PCIE_PHY_RESET BIT(0) >>>> +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET 0x1040 >>>> +#define PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET BIT(0) >>>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK BIT(1) >>>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_MASK 0x16 >>>> +#define PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE BIT(5) >>>> + >>>> +enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type { >>>> + PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data { >>>> + enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type ctrl_type; >>> >>> Why do we need this controller type ? >>> If there are changes in the IP between different version, >>> then you can as well use different compatibles. >> >> Do you mean is the using "of_device_is_compatible()"? > > I meant that multiple compatible strings can be added based on the > IP versions. And any IP specific data can be put in the .data field > of 'of_device_id' structure. > If there's more to differentiate between the IP versions at runtime, > you can use of_device_is_compatible(). > > [...] > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On 12/28/2016 05:58 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Hi Jaehoon, >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: >>> Hi Vivek, >>> >>> On 12/27/2016 02:53 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>>> Hi Jaehoon, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: >>>>> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy. >>>>> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe, >>>>> it needs to control the phy resgister. >>>>> But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++ >>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + >>>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>>>> index fe00f91..94b0433 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig >>>>> @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD >>>>> This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller >>>>> present on Exynos5 SoC series. >>>>> >>>>> +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE >>>>> + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver" >>>> >>>> Is there a reason for this not being 'tristate' ? >>> >>> Will change. >> >> I notice that PCI_EXYNOS5433 is bool as well. >> If the host has to be 'bool' then it makes sense to have phy >> also bool as well. But if PCI_EXYNOS5433 can be made >> tristate, then this also changes to tristate. > > Right. I understood what you said. > >> >>> >>>> >>>>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF >>>>> + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433 >>>>> + select GENERIC_PHY >>>>> + help >>>>> + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series. >>>> >>>> If this driver is for Exynos5433, then same should come in this help >>>> text as well. >>> >>> will support the other exynos series. >>> I'm working on refactoring exynos5440 with PHY generic Framework. >>> Then this drive is not for only Exnyos5433. how about? >> >> Ok, it's good then. My only concern is 'depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433' >> makes it look like it is for EXYNOS5433. I am fine if that changes as well. > > I will not put PCI_EXYNOS5433, just will use the PCI_EXYNOS. > Because it will be supported only one file as pci-exynos.c cool then. [...]
diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig index fe00f91..94b0433 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller present on Exynos5 SoC series. +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver" + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433 + select GENERIC_PHY + help + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series. + This driver provides PHY interface for Exynos PCIe controller. + config PHY_PISTACHIO_USB tristate "IMG Pistachio USB2.0 PHY driver" depends on MACH_PISTACHIO diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile index a534cf5..586344d 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4X12_USB2) += phy-exynos4x12-usb2.o phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2) += phy-exynos5250-usb2.o phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE) += phy-exynos-pcie.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_INNO_USB2) += phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.o diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0f5eefd --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +/* + * Samsung EXYNOS SoC series PCIe PHY driver + * + * Phy provider for PCIe controller on Exynos SoC series + * + * Copyright (C) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. + * Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + */ + +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> + +#define PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET 0x730 +#define PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 0x4) + +/* Sysreg Fsys register offset and bit for Exynos5433 */ +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET 0x208 +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK 0xFF +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET BIT(4) +#define PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON 0x1010 +#define PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN BIT(0) +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET 0x1020 +#define PCIE_PHY_RESET BIT(0) +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET 0x1040 +#define PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET BIT(0) +#define PCIE_REFCLK BIT(1) +#define PCIE_REFCLK_MASK 0x16 +#define PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE BIT(5) + +enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type { + PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, +}; + +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data { + enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type ctrl_type; + u32 pmureg_offset; /* PMU_REG offset */ + struct phy_ops *ops; +}; + +/* for Exynos pcie phy */ +struct exynos_pcie_phy { + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data; + struct regmap *pmureg; + struct regmap *fsysreg; + void __iomem *phy_base; +}; + +static void exynos_pcie_phy_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 offset) +{ + writel(val, base + offset); +} + +static int exynos_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) +{ + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy); + + if (ep->fsysreg) { + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET, + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 1); + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET, + PCIE_MAC_RESET, 0); + /* PHY refclk 24MHz */ + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, + PCIE_REFCLK_MASK, PCIE_REFCLK); + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, + PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET, 0); + } + + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x11, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3)); + + /* band gap reference on */ + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x20)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4b)); + + /* jitter tunning */ + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x02, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x41, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x21)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x7F, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x14)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xC0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x15)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x61, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x36)); + + /* D0 uninit.. */ + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3D)); + + /* 24MHz */ + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x94, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x8)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x9)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x93, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xA)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x6B, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xC)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA5, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xF)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x16)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA3, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x17)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x1A)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x71, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x23)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x4C, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x24)); + + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x0E, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x26)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x14, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x48, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x43)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x44)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x03, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x45)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x48)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x13, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x54)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x04, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x31)); + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x32)); + + if (ep->fsysreg) { + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET, + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 0); + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET, + PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK, PCIE_MAC_RESET); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int exynos_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy) +{ + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy); + + if (ep->pmureg) { + if (regmap_update_bits(ep->pmureg, ep->drv_data->pmureg_offset, + BIT(0), 1)) + dev_warn(&phy->dev, "Failed to update regmap bit.\n"); + } + + if (ep->fsysreg) { + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET, + PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE, 0); + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON, + PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN, 0); + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct phy_ops exynos_phy_ops = { + .init = exynos_pcie_phy_init, + .power_on = exynos_pcie_phy_power_on, +}; + +static const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data exynos5433_pcie_phy_data = { + .ctrl_type = PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433, + .pmureg_offset = PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET, + .ops = &exynos_phy_ops, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id exynos_pcie_phy_match[] = { + { + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-pcie-phy", + .data = &exynos5433_pcie_phy_data, + }, + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_phy_match); + +static int exynos_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct exynos_pcie_phy *exynos_phy; + struct phy *generic_phy; + struct phy_provider *phy_provider; + struct resource *res; + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data; + const struct of_device_id *match; + + exynos_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_phy), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!exynos_phy) + return -ENOMEM; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + exynos_phy->phy_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base)) + return PTR_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base); + + exynos_phy->pmureg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, + "samsung,pmureg-phandle"); + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->pmureg)) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "pmureg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n"); + exynos_phy->pmureg = NULL; + } + + match = of_match_node(exynos_pcie_phy_match, pdev->dev.of_node); + drv_data = match->data; + exynos_phy->drv_data = drv_data; + + exynos_phy->fsysreg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, + "samsung,fsys-sysreg"); + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->fsysreg)) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Fsysreg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n"); + exynos_phy->fsysreg = NULL; + } + + generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, drv_data->ops); + if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n"); + return PTR_ERR(generic_phy); + } + + phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, exynos_phy); + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate); + + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider); +} + +static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_phy_driver = { + .probe = exynos_pcie_phy_probe, + .driver = { + .of_match_table = exynos_pcie_phy_match, + .name = "exynos_pcie_phy", + } +}; +module_platform_driver(exynos_pcie_phy_driver);
This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy. When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe, it needs to control the phy resgister. But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> --- drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++ drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c