Message ID | 20190213222402.20541-3-stuart.menefy@mathembedded.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | mfd: sec: Add support for the RTC on S2MPA01 | expand |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Stuart Menefy wrote: > The RTC portion of the S2MPA01 appears to have the same > register layout as the S2MPS14. > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@mathembedded.com> Tags should be in chronological order. That way they can give us more information about the submission path. I'll fix this. Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c index 5ff3fd726f9e..8a299080cb55 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps15_devs[] = { static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = { { .name = "s2mpa01-pmic", }, + { .name = "s2mps14-rtc", }, }; static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = { diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c index ad0099077e7e..a98c5d165039 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c @@ -455,6 +455,9 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic) case S5M8767X: sec_irq_chip = &s5m8767_irq_chip; break; + case S2MPA01: + sec_irq_chip = &s2mps14_irq_chip; + break; case S2MPS11X: sec_irq_chip = &s2mps11_irq_chip; break;