diff mbox series

[v4,07/16] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: correct timeout value setting registers

Message ID 20211007080934.108804-8-chanho61.park@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series introduce exynosauto v9 ufs driver | expand

Commit Message

Chanho Park Oct. 7, 2021, 8:09 a.m. UTC
PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA0 -> DL_FC0PROTTIMEOUTVAL
PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA1 -> DL_TC0REPLAYTIMEOUTVAL
PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA2 -> DL_AFC0REQTIMEOUTVAL

Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Fixes: a967ddb22d94 ("scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: Apply vendor-specific values for three timeouts")
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Avri Altman Oct. 14, 2021, 12:12 p.m. UTC | #1
> 
> PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA0 -> DL_FC0PROTTIMEOUTVAL
> PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA1 -> DL_TC0REPLAYTIMEOUTVAL
> PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA2 -> DL_AFC0REQTIMEOUTVAL
Is there a specific reason why this fix is part of the exynosauto series?

Thanks,
Avri
Chanho Park Oct. 15, 2021, 9:53 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi, Thanks for your review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 9:12 PM
> To: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>; Alim Akhtar
> <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; James E . J . Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>;
> Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>; Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>;
> Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; hch@infradead.org; Can Guo
> <cang@codeaurora.org>; Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>; Jaehoon Chung
> <jh80.chung@samsung.com>; Gyunghoon Kwon <goodjob.kwon@samsung.com>; Sowon
> Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> scsi@vger.kernel.org; Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 07/16] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: correct timeout value
> setting registers
> 
> >
> > PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA0 -> DL_FC0PROTTIMEOUTVAL
> > PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA1 -> DL_TC0REPLAYTIMEOUTVAL
> > PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA2 -> DL_AFC0REQTIMEOUTVAL
> Is there a specific reason why this fix is part of the exynosauto series?

I found the issue when I made the patches with some refactoring of ufs-exynos driver.
I can send it separately.

Best Regards,
Chanho Park
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
index e800fb9e1ce4..41797f499544 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
@@ -643,9 +643,9 @@  static int exynos_ufs_pre_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 	}
 
 	/* setting for three timeout values for traffic class #0 */
-	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA0), 8064);
-	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA1), 28224);
-	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA2), 20160);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(DL_FC0PROTTIMEOUTVAL), 8064);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(DL_TC0REPLAYTIMEOUTVAL), 28224);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(DL_AFC0REQTIMEOUTVAL), 20160);
 
 	return 0;
 out: