Message ID | 20190401044247.29881-1-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-scsi-owner@kernel.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D30317E1 for <patchwork-linux-scsi@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BD2287E0 for <patchwork-linux-scsi@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id E5135287EA; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:43:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9ACD287E8 for <patchwork-linux-scsi@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726510AbfDAEm6 (ORCPT <rfc822;patchwork-linux-scsi@patchwork.kernel.org>); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 00:42:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47770 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725860AbfDAEm6 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 00:42:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D87DC04958C; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-8-23.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF4C26349; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:42:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>, James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Subject: [PATCH V2 0/3] blk-mq: allow to run queue if queue refcount is held Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:42:44 +0800 Message-Id: <20190401044247.29881-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
blk-mq: allow to run queue if queue refcount is held
|
expand
|