From patchwork Thu Oct 24 07:50:30 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Avri Altman X-Patchwork-Id: 13848480 Received: from esa4.hgst.iphmx.com (esa4.hgst.iphmx.com [216.71.154.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5C9149C42; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 07:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.71.154.42 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729756367; cv=none; b=bfqSCnSDy9OqXTB1GJtayUVt5VddPOHT0rDhB2N1Qixq+sNPyiprFax0EwSSikc8kcS7bHuEIL9ikza65PJFNSxr5cT/fzbXy5Zk40shb2qehCmlL3RkFXOqyIAwyjOGSBj7ImGF+f3+dAIsjgSckOJ+iVdk0w3h651lmpGDCrE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729756367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OBgeXMgXB7lWPG64KctKSuo5WncijrmwaG1Ev8IYCws=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=MFXfgMVJcPJQizYm2+BSSksX2UDmleEvRp+YPOYQD8fSc1S2KofRZd2YU27hHkQ59ykHpi2A2FGQFzSman71sNBtYEfYT0CKH2ELTsWZcAD7hSFm7SgB8xRqzNyVHTFCS4AzTZ3p2jBq66IpGgRGC5Ytp6E1YGGG7TvVX6PIDKg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wdc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wdc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wdc.com header.i=@wdc.com header.b=S303C2Vp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.71.154.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wdc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wdc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wdc.com header.i=@wdc.com header.b="S303C2Vp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1729756366; x=1761292366; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=OBgeXMgXB7lWPG64KctKSuo5WncijrmwaG1Ev8IYCws=; b=S303C2Vp9Eucm7StZDe2Bn17zsThLWIs8zjZX4q52ed3I+xsU8VMV+QQ bHz6CKEHcbXqsG0Pb0obEy0amXFXOL3l6wXSnUuI6weC69RrhtxKLFXom us/2bjikxhLXZssWP/pw2NFSBDcPdJZzYYsti7Io8aHORbjgzwEGK8I02 ukdrtyAhsTgjnddm8ssgTWypPXXNjZXLti8jlPAzuFWTdjrS0tLYSyk0m Ea3szTveE3pzpVO2qIyYvBTGjyJcvIu2GPufWUGwkV7y65r1SOHCWC5HV t5kVqTjnd/uY++mVumopvvi2pwJw3ojScoHVcN5+D/Yal0lok71njIPoU A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: whLPTryySbqoPkMxXb5hRg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ATh4849lR9iAvnoTqeWGhg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,228,1725292800"; d="scan'208";a="29156098" Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2024 15:52:39 +0800 IronPort-SDR: 6719ee56_Y8BloZOZMZqOf/1eePl387MZmwywqGHbsjaYiPT0ujkMfWW oQn+GMBfUou1ACPolNny5YDBwqPQZWjPWj/Wdgw== Received: from uls-op-cesaip01.wdc.com ([10.248.3.36]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 23 Oct 2024 23:51:02 -0700 WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from avri-office.ad.shared (HELO avri-office.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com) ([10.45.31.142]) by uls-op-cesaip01.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 24 Oct 2024 00:52:38 -0700 From: Avri Altman To: "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche , Avri Altman Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] Untie the host lock entanglement - part 1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:50:30 +0300 Message-Id: <20241024075033.562562-1-avri.altman@wdc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 While trying to simplify the ufs core driver with the guard() macro [1], Bart made note of the abuse of the scsi host lock in the ufs driver. Indeed, the host lock is deeply entangled in various flows across the driver, as if it was some occasional default synchronization mean. Here is the first part of defusing it, remove some of those calls around host registers accesses, which needs no protection. Doing this in phases seems like a reasonable approach, given the myriad use of the host lock. Changes compared to v2: - leave out changing ufshcd_tmc_handler Changes compared to v1: - get rid of redundant locking (Bart) - leave out the HCE register [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/0b031b8f-c07c-42ef-af93-7336439d3c37@acm.org/ Avri Altman (3): scsi: ufs: core: Remove redundant host_lock calls around UTMRLDBR. scsi: ufs: core: Remove redundant host_lock calls around UTMRLCLR scsi: ufs: core: Remove redundant host_lock calls around UTRLCLR. drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 20 ++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)