Message ID | 1460096094-126214-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
Hannes> zfcp has its own mechanism for selective scanning, so revert to
Hannes> the original scanning behaviour to not confuse users.
Benjamin?
On 22:14 Mon 11 Apr , Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes: > > Hannes> zfcp has its own mechanism for selective scanning, so revert to > Hannes> the original scanning behaviour to not confuse users. > > Benjamin? > Sry, I meant to quickly test this yesterday but got carried away. As far as I understand the patch-series this should be good. Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Beste Grüße / Best regards, - Benjamin Block
>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
Hannes> zfcp has its own mechanism for selective scanning, so revert to
Hannes> the original scanning behaviour to not confuse users.
Applied to 4.7/scsi-queue.
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c index 08bba7c..9310a54 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void zfcp_unit_scsi_scan(struct zfcp_unit *unit) if (rport && rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE) scsi_scan_target(&rport->dev, 0, rport->scsi_target_id, lun, - SCSI_SCAN_RESCAN); + SCSI_SCAN_MANUAL); } static void zfcp_unit_scsi_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
zfcp has its own mechanism for selective scanning, so revert to the original scanning behaviour to not confuse users. Fixes: 4e91e876e9b8b6eb4255aa0d690778a89d3f1d28 Suggested-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)