diff mbox series

[v1] mpt3sas: correct reset of smid while clearing scsi tracker

Message ID 1533015328-10260-1-git-send-email-sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v1] mpt3sas: correct reset of smid while clearing scsi tracker | expand

Commit Message

Sreekanth Reddy July 31, 2018, 5:35 a.m. UTC
In mpt3sas_base_clear_st() function smid value is reseted in wrong line,
i.e. driver should reset smid value to zero after decrementing chain_offset
counter in chain_lookup table but in current code, driver is resetting smid
value before decrementing the chain_offset counter. which we are correcting
with this patch.

v1 changelog:
Added memory barriers before & after atomic_set() API.

Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Martin K. Petersen Aug. 2, 2018, 8:11 p.m. UTC | #1
Bart,

> In mpt3sas_base_clear_st() function smid value is reseted in wrong
> line, i.e. driver should reset smid value to zero after decrementing
> chain_offset counter in chain_lookup table but in current code, driver
> is resetting smid value before decrementing the chain_offset
> counter. which we are correcting with this patch.

You asked for Sreekanth to make changes. Please review the result.

Thanks!
Bart Van Assche Aug. 2, 2018, 8:20 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 16:11 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > In mpt3sas_base_clear_st() function smid value is reseted in wrong
> > line, i.e. driver should reset smid value to zero after decrementing
> > chain_offset counter in chain_lookup table but in current code, driver
> > is resetting smid value before decrementing the chain_offset
> > counter. which we are correcting with this patch.
> 
> You asked for Sreekanth to make changes. Please review the result.

Hello Martin,

That update had escaped from my attention because I wasn't Cc-ed on the
update. Anyway, I will review that patch first.

Bart.
Bart Van Assche Aug. 2, 2018, 8:38 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 01:35 -0400, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> In mpt3sas_base_clear_st() function smid value is reseted in wrong line,
> i.e. driver should reset smid value to zero after decrementing chain_offset
> counter in chain_lookup table but in current code, driver is resetting smid
> value before decrementing the chain_offset counter. which we are correcting
> with this patch.
> 
> v1 changelog:
> Added memory barriers before & after atomic_set() API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> index 902610d..94359d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> @@ -1702,6 +1702,8 @@ static int mpt3sas_remove_dead_ioc_func(void *arg)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	chain_req = &ioc->chain_lookup[smid - 1].chains_per_smid[chain_offset];
> +	/* Adding memory barrier before atomic operation. */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();

I know that checkpatch complains if it encounters a barrier without preceding
comment. The comment above this barrier doesn't seem useful to me - it is so
general that that comment could be added above every smp_mb__before_atomic()
call. The comment above a barrier should explain which other code needs the
barrier in order to execute correctly.

>  	atomic_inc(&ioc->chain_lookup[smid - 1].chain_offset);
>  	return chain_req;
>  }
> @@ -3283,8 +3285,12 @@ void mpt3sas_base_clear_st(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc,
>  		return;
>  	st->cb_idx = 0xFF;
>  	st->direct_io = 0;
> -	st->smid = 0;
> +	/* Adding memory barrier before atomic operation. */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();
>  	atomic_set(&ioc->chain_lookup[st->smid - 1].chain_offset, 0);
> +	/* Adding memory barrier after atomic operation. */
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +	st->smid = 0;

Same comment here: the comments that have been added are not useful. I think it
is clear that you want to enforce the order in which .chain_offset and .smid are
written. But which is the other code that can race with this code and that
depends on this write order? I think this information should have been mentioned
in the patch description.

Thanks,

Bart.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
index 902610d..94359d8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
@@ -1702,6 +1702,8 @@  static int mpt3sas_remove_dead_ioc_func(void *arg)
 		return NULL;
 
 	chain_req = &ioc->chain_lookup[smid - 1].chains_per_smid[chain_offset];
+	/* Adding memory barrier before atomic operation. */
+	smp_mb__before_atomic();
 	atomic_inc(&ioc->chain_lookup[smid - 1].chain_offset);
 	return chain_req;
 }
@@ -3283,8 +3285,12 @@  void mpt3sas_base_clear_st(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc,
 		return;
 	st->cb_idx = 0xFF;
 	st->direct_io = 0;
-	st->smid = 0;
+	/* Adding memory barrier before atomic operation. */
+	smp_mb__before_atomic();
 	atomic_set(&ioc->chain_lookup[st->smid - 1].chain_offset, 0);
+	/* Adding memory barrier after atomic operation. */
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
+	st->smid = 0;
 }
 
 /**